Loose Balls vs Caged Balls
#1
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,104
Likes: 1
From: Austin
Bikes: Too many to count
Loose Balls vs Caged Balls
I was wondering which is better. Loose balls or caged balls? If I have a bottom bracket (old-school) that uses a retainer to hold the ball bearings, should I ditch the retainer and just run loose balls?
And what about this n-1 business? What I mean by that is, let's say that after I take out the retainer, I can put more balls into the assembly. Should I fill up as many balls as will ride on the race and then take out 1 ball, hence n-1? Or should I just fit as many balls as possible that will sit evenly on the race?
And what about this n-1 business? What I mean by that is, let's say that after I take out the retainer, I can put more balls into the assembly. Should I fill up as many balls as will ride on the race and then take out 1 ball, hence n-1? Or should I just fit as many balls as possible that will sit evenly on the race?
#4
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,104
Likes: 1
From: Austin
Bikes: Too many to count
What's so great about n-1? Isn't the idea to spread the load as best you can? So, therefore n minus anything is going to spread the load alot worse than n minus nothing. And if your goal is to use less ball bearings, then why even through away the retainer?
#5
Your mom

Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,545
Likes: 2
Just stole a decent explanation from the C&V forum:
Each time 2 bearings touch, the friction between them is an issue since the speed of the contact point is in direct opposition direction wise... If they are held in so closely that they can't float away from each other friction between the bearings is an issue.
Not sure if it's true, but it sure does sound good!
Each time 2 bearings touch, the friction between them is an issue since the speed of the contact point is in direct opposition direction wise... If they are held in so closely that they can't float away from each other friction between the bearings is an issue.
Not sure if it's true, but it sure does sound good!
#8
Originally Posted by tellyho
Definitely n-1. Don't know why. Someone on the forum is actually of an n-2 persuasion, after having a problem with n-1.
Hubs and BBs have, pretty much, a constant rotating motion, whereas headset bearings are not moving around much at all. "n-2" introduces a randomness to where the balls position themselves to reduce the occurence of brinnelling.
#9
Originally Posted by bellweatherman
What's so great about n-1? Isn't the idea to spread the load as best you can? So, therefore n minus anything is going to spread the load alot worse than n minus nothing. And if your goal is to use less ball bearings, then why even through away the retainer?
In other words, another way of looking at what "n-1" means is that "[(first occurence of jumble) - 1]" would be optimum for hubs and BBs.
#11
cab horn

Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 28,353
Likes: 31
From: Toronto
Bikes: 1987 Bianchi Campione
Originally Posted by cascade168
"n-1" is correct for hubs and BBs. "n-2" is for headsets - taken directly from Barnett's Manual. So, it's not just "someone on the forum".
.
.
N, is the amount that you can put in before you have to stack the bearings vertically.
Last edited by operator; 05-12-07 at 02:47 PM.
#12
Gone, but not forgotten


Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 2,301
Likes: 12
From: Newtonville, Massachusetts
Bikes: See: https://sheldonbrown.org/bicycles
Originally Posted by bellweatherman
I was wondering which is better. Loose balls or caged balls? If I have a bottom bracket (old-school) that uses a retainer to hold the ball bearings, should I ditch the retainer and just run loose balls?
Standard bottom brackets use 11 1/4" balls on each side, but most of the retainers have fewer. Saves a teeny bit of money for the manufacturer, but won't roll as smoothly nor last as long.
Sheldon "It Goes To Eleven!" Brown
#13
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,104
Likes: 1
From: Austin
Bikes: Too many to count
OK, thanks. So ditching the retainer will, sometimes, allow me to sit more balls in. And that is good to distribute the weight more evenly.
I think people are confused about what "n" actually means. I did a search and some people are saying that "n" is the number of balls that fits in a perfect circle. Others say otherwise. So, this controversy about the n, n-1, and n-2 maybe relates to nobody really having a standard definition of what "n" actually is.
I think people are confused about what "n" actually means. I did a search and some people are saying that "n" is the number of balls that fits in a perfect circle. Others say otherwise. So, this controversy about the n, n-1, and n-2 maybe relates to nobody really having a standard definition of what "n" actually is.
#17
rebmeM roineS

Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 16,231
Likes: 366
From: Metro Indy, IN
Bikes: Bacchetta Giro A20, RANS V-Rex, RANS Screamer
Originally Posted by bellweatherman
What's "n"? Link please. And what is a hemostat?
#20
rebmeM roineS

Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 16,231
Likes: 366
From: Metro Indy, IN
Bikes: Bacchetta Giro A20, RANS V-Rex, RANS Screamer
You can pick up a ball with a hemostat and put it where it needs to go with the hemostat. You can fill a race and then remove one, if need be.
#21
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,104
Likes: 1
From: Austin
Bikes: Too many to count
Originally Posted by JanMM
You can pick up a ball with a hemostat and put it where it needs to go with the hemostat. You can fill a race and then remove one, if need be.
What is "n"? Link?
#22
Originally Posted by bellweatherman
What's "n"? Link please. And what is a hemostat?
Last edited by JunkYardBike; 05-13-07 at 07:36 AM.
#24
Senior Member

Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,392
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by bellweatherman
What is "n"? Link?
#25
Originally Posted by Moose




