How much “wheel hop” do you consider acceptable when truing a wheel?
#1
How much “wheel hop” do you consider acceptable when truing a wheel?
Of course 0mm is ideal.
But if you end up with 1mm, do you call it good? 2mm? 5mm?
I mean, once tension is even and of proper amount and side to side is true, but you have “x” amount of wheel hop.
How much would you have to see to make you start over…?
But if you end up with 1mm, do you call it good? 2mm? 5mm?
I mean, once tension is even and of proper amount and side to side is true, but you have “x” amount of wheel hop.
How much would you have to see to make you start over…?
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Chicago area
Posts: 2,665
Bikes: Airborne "Carpe Diem", Motobecane "Mirage", Trek 6000, Strida 2, Dahon "Helios XL", Dahon "Mu XL", Tern "Verge S11i"
Liked 633 Times
in
436 Posts
"Wheel hop" = radial deviation.
"side-to-side" = lateral (or axial) deviation.
I don't build a lot of wheels, just for my personal use. I'd consider 1mm of radial deviation OK. Maybe 2mm tops. Depending on the tire size and inflation pressure*, these would probably be undetectable when riding.
EDIT: *... and speed.
"side-to-side" = lateral (or axial) deviation.
I don't build a lot of wheels, just for my personal use. I'd consider 1mm of radial deviation OK. Maybe 2mm tops. Depending on the tire size and inflation pressure*, these would probably be undetectable when riding.
EDIT: *... and speed.
#3
Method to My Madness
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: Orange County, California
Posts: 4,144
Bikes: Trek FX 2, Cannondale Synapse x2, Cannondale CAAD4, Santa Cruz Stigmata 3
Liked 1,702 Times
in
1,169 Posts
According to the Hand Built Wheel Inspection sheets that came with my new Roval Terra CL wheelset, the Radial Trueness is 0.17 front and 0.3 back. No units stated; hopefully mm?
#4
It depends on whether the variation is due to how accurately it is trued or if it is due to a specific problem area - like around the seam.
Likes For Kontact:
#5
I hope for better than 1 mm, if I'm building from new parts. The rim has to start out round. I've never been successful trying to straighten a bent rim on the truing stand. Maybe a more experienced builder could have a better chance, but I don't think I've built even a dozen wheels in my lifetime. I only build wheels because I'm interested in oddities such as IGH's.
For me, a "moment of truth" on the stand is not really my goal. I'm trying to build a wheel that will stay true in actual use. For this reason, I'm aiming for fairly high and consistent tension.
For me, a "moment of truth" on the stand is not really my goal. I'm trying to build a wheel that will stay true in actual use. For this reason, I'm aiming for fairly high and consistent tension.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Elevation 666m Edmonton Canada
Posts: 2,572
Bikes: 2013 Custom SA5w / Rohloff Tourster
Liked 368 Times
in
274 Posts
I'm sure mine are less than 4/1000", but the joint is never perfect. Tires are off 1 mm a lot of the time.
How I do this is put a piece of elec tape across the fork touching the rim and whittle the hump down.
The closer it gets the less the tape deflects when moving the rim back and forth.
How I do this is put a piece of elec tape across the fork touching the rim and whittle the hump down.
The closer it gets the less the tape deflects when moving the rim back and forth.
#7
Senior Member
I've never measured it but you can easily see 1 mm and I would consider that to be excessive. Before I could quote a number I would have to take actual measurements and that isn't on the cards. Grab a$$ number would be 0.3 mm.
Likes For KerryIrons:
#8
Senior Member
None, in all seriousness, while I've never actually measured it, but I expect that no more than a quarter turn of the adjusting knob is all that is needed to go from the rim touching for the whole circumference to not touching anywhere. When spun in the hand there should be no visible movement indicating any type of hop at all. I also don't think this is nit picky, at high speeds I don't want anything that can even remotely throw off the way the bike feels.
Likes For Russ Roth:
#9
Over the hill
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 24,426
Bikes: Giant Defy, Giant Revolt
Liked 1,265 Times
in
718 Posts
Depends on the rim. I used to get what looked like 2mm at some seams and no amount of spoke tension variance would change that, but it seems that they do a better job making rims nowadays. I like it when I can only hear it and not see it on the truing stand. That being said, even spoke tension is more important than a fraction of a mm.
__________________
It's like riding a bicycle
It's like riding a bicycle
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 13,336
Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder
Liked 4,339 Times
in
2,793 Posts
Round wins friends and influence. Even tensioned wheels go further with less attention.
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 13,336
Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder
Liked 4,339 Times
in
2,793 Posts
Depends on the rim. I used to get what looked like 2mm at some seams and no amount of spoke tension variance would change that, but it seems that they do a better job making rims nowadays. I like it when I can only hear it and not see it on the truing stand. That being said, even spoke tension is more important than a fraction of a mm.
Likes For 79pmooney:
#12
I don't build many wheels, no dial indicators on my stand, but If I can get within a credit card's thickness (.75mm) I call it good.
Rim joints can be troublesome, sometimes they appear worse than they are because it's the only deviation.
There is a recent park tools YouTube about not interlacing crossed spokes, I think my future wheels will be built without interlacing, I find its easier to get a consistent note when you pluck a spoke.
Rim joints can be troublesome, sometimes they appear worse than they are because it's the only deviation.
There is a recent park tools YouTube about not interlacing crossed spokes, I think my future wheels will be built without interlacing, I find its easier to get a consistent note when you pluck a spoke.
#13
I build wheels to .5mm radial variance. My friend Al, who is a perfectionist, dials them in to within .1mm. His wheels are truly exceptional, and the sick thing is that he can get that level of roundness in the same amount of time it takes me to get my .5mm. The guy is amazing.
2mm out of round is unacceptable, especially with rim brakes.
2mm out of round is unacceptable, especially with rim brakes.
Likes For TiHabanero:
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: northern Deep South
Posts: 9,171
Bikes: Fuji Touring, Novara Randonee
Liked 2,172 Times
in
1,335 Posts
I want my wheels true enough that I don't feel any irregularities, which depends a lot on the tire size. I could probably tolerate 3-4 mm on a fatbike, but I'd want less than 1 mm on 20mm wide tires.
#15
Old fart
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Appleton WI
Posts: 25,052
Bikes: Several, mostly not name brands.
Liked 3,684 Times
in
2,080 Posts
+1 this. With new rims, my experience is that more expensive rims will be closer to round than cheap rims. Deviation from round at the weld seam/joint won't go away, no matter what you try. With used rims, do your best but don't expect perfection no matter what the original quality of the rim.
Likes For JohnDThompson:
#16
Senior Member
When building, I try to get the radial runout as close as possible. Is that 0.1mm? .004"? I don't know. Except for around the seam, the radial 'hop' is typically not visible. My theory is that radial runout is more closely tied to overall spoke tension in differnet regions of the wheel, so when building and everything is as close to ideal as possible, it makes sense to put in some extra effort to get this as good as possible.
For lateral 'side to side' runout, maybe I shoot for about the same, but since I stopped working in shops and only build my own wheels, 'not hitting the brake pads' is the standard I go for.
For lateral 'side to side' runout, maybe I shoot for about the same, but since I stopped working in shops and only build my own wheels, 'not hitting the brake pads' is the standard I go for.
#17
Randomhead
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Happy Valley, Pennsylvania
Posts: 24,893
Liked 4,051 Times
in
2,757 Posts
On good rims, the seam is usually pretty good. I true to tension mostly. Rim brake wheels I pull true even if it causes a small variation in tension. Cheap wheels are different. Fortunately most cheap bikes nowadays come with disc brakes so it's not super important to get a wheel exactly true or round.
#18
Mad bike riding scientist
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 27,700
Bikes: Some silver ones, a red one, a black and orange one, and a few titanium ones
Liked 4,538 Times
in
2,522 Posts
The seam is always a problem. The pins used to hold the rim together…even welded rims have pins…resist the curvature of the rest of the rim and leave a slight flat spot.
__________________
Stuart Black
Plan Epsilon Around Lake Michigan in the era of Covid
Old School…When It Wasn’t Ancient bikepacking
Gold Fever Three days of dirt in Colorado
Pokin' around the Poconos A cold ride around Lake Erie
Dinosaurs in Colorado A mountain bike guide to the Purgatory Canyon dinosaur trackway
Solo Without Pie. The search for pie in the Midwest.
Picking the Scablands. Washington and Oregon, 2005. Pie and spiders on the Columbia River!
Stuart Black
Plan Epsilon Around Lake Michigan in the era of Covid
Old School…When It Wasn’t Ancient bikepacking
Gold Fever Three days of dirt in Colorado
Pokin' around the Poconos A cold ride around Lake Erie
Dinosaurs in Colorado A mountain bike guide to the Purgatory Canyon dinosaur trackway
Solo Without Pie. The search for pie in the Midwest.
Picking the Scablands. Washington and Oregon, 2005. Pie and spiders on the Columbia River!
Likes For cyccommute:
#19
I am potato.
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 3,344
Bikes: Only precision built, custom high performance elitist machines of the highest caliber. 🍆
Liked 1,877 Times
in
1,066 Posts
I don't feel that any hop is acceptable. Honestly, it's not hard to tighten the spokes a half-turn at a time where ever the rim touches the top of the arms of the trueing stand until the not-yet-wheel is round & a moderate tension has been reached. Then side-to-side axial true, then dishing. It's at this point the wheel is about 75% built & I go back to focussing on radial deviation.
Then axial working on sets of spokes & so it goes back & forth until perfection at the target tension.
Radial is probably the easiest red flag for uneven spoke tension. The spoke under the higher load is going to unfairly pull the rim towards the hub. When all your tensions are even this is pretty obvious. A tension meter can help but I find it is more of a quality control & validation tool to a properly built, round wheel.
I prefer to have my wheels be a cross section of a sphere & not that of a cone. Focusing only on tension or axial deviation will not yield a round wheel. Round is where there will be the least stress & greatest load share in service.
Then axial working on sets of spokes & so it goes back & forth until perfection at the target tension.
Radial is probably the easiest red flag for uneven spoke tension. The spoke under the higher load is going to unfairly pull the rim towards the hub. When all your tensions are even this is pretty obvious. A tension meter can help but I find it is more of a quality control & validation tool to a properly built, round wheel.
I prefer to have my wheels be a cross section of a sphere & not that of a cone. Focusing only on tension or axial deviation will not yield a round wheel. Round is where there will be the least stress & greatest load share in service.
__________________
I shouldn't have to "make myself more visible;" Drivers should just stop running people over.
Car dependency is a tax.
I shouldn't have to "make myself more visible;" Drivers should just stop running people over.
Car dependency is a tax.
Likes For base2:
#20
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Bastrop Texas
Posts: 4,771
Bikes: Univega, Peu P6, Peu PR-10, Ted Williams, Peu UO-8, Peu UO-18 Mixte, Peu Dolomites
Liked 1,849 Times
in
1,185 Posts
Got visited by an old buddy from SanAnto. We were hanging out in the driveway getting a couple of bikes ready for a ride and he spotted an old aluminum rim I had given up on. It was out of round and twisted laterally. He grabbed a hammer out of my tool box and within minuets had it all straightened out by just twisting and banging on it on my picnic bench. I was so impressed. It looked perfect. Of course 40 years banging dents out of cars in his body shop probably had allot to do with it.
As to the OP: A hop is not acceptable. But as things get more and more expensive there are things we have to put up with until we can afford a fix, repair, or replacement. So when is a hop unacceptable? When you can feel it during your ride bad things are around the corner...
As to the OP: A hop is not acceptable. But as things get more and more expensive there are things we have to put up with until we can afford a fix, repair, or replacement. So when is a hop unacceptable? When you can feel it during your ride bad things are around the corner...
__________________
No matter where you're at... There you are... Δf:=f(1/2)-f(-1/2)
No matter where you're at... There you are... Δf:=f(1/2)-f(-1/2)
#21
Senior Member
In manufacturing, everything has some variance from 'perfect'. In super-precision devices this might be in the 1/10s of 1/1000", but there is still variation. On a bicycle wheel, I bet most would be unable to feel a difference of 1mm, radially or laterally. The variance allowed before you can feel it likely varies with tire width and pressure - an 18mm tire at 140psi might make a wheel hop noticeable that wouldn't be noticeable with a 35mm tire at 60psi. Lateral movement is generally less noticable than radial - I have ridden many kms with a broken spoke and 5 or 6mm of lateral runout and not noticed until I realized the brake was rubbing and I looked at the wheel passing through the brakes. A major 'dent' or other flaw causing radial runout is easier to feel.
Likes For ClydeClydeson:
#23
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: San Jose (Willow Glen) Ca
Posts: 10,393
Bikes: Kirk Custom JK Special, '84 Team Miyata,(dura ace old school) 80?? SR Semi-Pro 600 Arabesque
Liked 3,494 Times
in
1,827 Posts
the park tool wheelbuilding site list 1mm for radial and .5 mm for lateral (10 sheets of paper and 5 sheets of paper respectively)
https://www.parktool.com/en-us/blog/...and-rim-truing
https://www.parktool.com/en-us/blog/...and-rim-truing
__________________
Life is too short not to ride the best bike you have, as much as you can.
Life is too short not to ride the best bike you have, as much as you can.
#24
working on my sandal tan
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CID
Posts: 22,670
Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)
Liked 2,600 Times
in
1,593 Posts
My standards can be flexible. The 1980s Weinmann rim on the back of my fixed-gear has never in its life been as perfectly round as we expect from good rims today, so I only touch it up if it gets more than a couple millimeters out. Fortunately, that's rare.
Come to think of it, my goal is always to get the wheel as round and true as the rim started out. (Checking it against a pane of glass first isn't a bad idea.) I often have to compromise a little at the rim joint, but with experience, you can find that point of diminishing returns a lot sooner.
Come to think of it, my goal is always to get the wheel as round and true as the rim started out. (Checking it against a pane of glass first isn't a bad idea.) I often have to compromise a little at the rim joint, but with experience, you can find that point of diminishing returns a lot sooner.
#25
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Boulder County, CO
Posts: 4,576
Bikes: '80 Masi Gran Criterium, '12 Trek Madone, early '60s Frejus track
Liked 514 Times
in
389 Posts
I build wheels to .5mm radial variance. My friend Al, who is a perfectionist, dials them in to within .1mm. His wheels are truly exceptional, and the sick thing is that he can get that level of roundness in the same amount of time it takes me to get my .5mm. The guy is amazing.
2mm out of round is unacceptable, especially with rim brakes.
2mm out of round is unacceptable, especially with rim brakes.