It feels unsafe and borderline reckless to ride in actual traffic where there is no s
#126
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Far beyond the pale horizon.
Posts: 14,576
Liked 1,498 Times
in
1,037 Posts
Likes For njkayaker:
#127
20+mph Commuter
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Greenville. SC USA
Posts: 7,568
Bikes: Surly LHT, Surly Lowside, a folding bike, and a beater.
Liked 356 Times
in
237 Posts
Exactly. Every time a car passes us we roll the dice. Who knows what's going on with each driver, other than what I notice, and that ain't very promising.
#129
#130
genec
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: West Coast
Posts: 27,079
Bikes: custom built, sannino, beachbike, giant trance x2
Liked 4,532 Times
in
3,158 Posts
Of course, if the runner vehicle is stolen, that won't do much good. That crash was totally insane... have people just stopped caring at all when they drive now??? Certainly the other cars zooming by behind the reporter seem to be going at a rather high speed, for a street of that nature, with all those crosswalks on it.
#131
Senior Member
What you are talking about is a transponder. And if you think about it, Drivers will become reliant on the "fact" that cyclists and pedestrians have these, and will stop thinking for themselves. So the first time you go out with a low battery in your transponder... you get hit.
Now on the other hand, every driver out there has a big windshield, and is required to at least see out of one eye... and by law is required to NOT HIT THE THINGS IN FRONT OF YOU. One might think that would be sufficient.
But, sure, let's complicate things by adding transponders to ordinary humans so the smart cars can do what the dumb drivers won't do.
BTW as an aside... I like those blinkers that have a system that increases the blink rate as a motorist approaches... is that a Garmin Radar thing?
Now on the other hand, every driver out there has a big windshield, and is required to at least see out of one eye... and by law is required to NOT HIT THE THINGS IN FRONT OF YOU. One might think that would be sufficient.
But, sure, let's complicate things by adding transponders to ordinary humans so the smart cars can do what the dumb drivers won't do.
BTW as an aside... I like those blinkers that have a system that increases the blink rate as a motorist approaches... is that a Garmin Radar thing?
However, if the Varia can work without any requirement for cars, I'm sure the engineers at Garmin can do the same thing for cars without any requirement for cyclists or pedestrians. That's the premise behind self-driving vehicles.
But if the transponder is the current solution, what would be the big deal if they are supplied free of charge to all cyclists and pedestrians paid by, of course, auto manufacturers or licenced drivers. If you can carry your keys, wallet or purse with you everytime you leave your home, you can carry a transponder too.
New cars nowadays supply so many things as standard features anyways and if you also haven't noticed a lot of those features suit the bad driver, like parallel parking and blind spot detection.
Complicated? It's already here.
#132
genec
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: West Coast
Posts: 27,079
Bikes: custom built, sannino, beachbike, giant trance x2
Liked 4,532 Times
in
3,158 Posts
In case you haven't noticed, a lot of drivers aren't paying attention anyways. If I'm wrong about that, we wouldn't be discussing how dangerous our streets are.
However, if the Varia can work without any requirement for cars, I'm sure the engineers at Garmin can do the same thing for cars without any requirement for cyclists or pedestrians. That's the premise behind self-driving vehicles.
But if the transponder is the current solution, what would be the big deal if they are supplied free of charge to all cyclists and pedestrians paid by, of course, auto manufacturers or licenced drivers. If you can carry your keys, wallet or purse with you everytime you leave your home, you can carry a transponder too.
New cars nowadays supply so many things as standard features anyways and if you also haven't noticed a lot of those features suit the bad driver, like parallel parking and blind spot detection.
Complicated? It's already here.
However, if the Varia can work without any requirement for cars, I'm sure the engineers at Garmin can do the same thing for cars without any requirement for cyclists or pedestrians. That's the premise behind self-driving vehicles.
But if the transponder is the current solution, what would be the big deal if they are supplied free of charge to all cyclists and pedestrians paid by, of course, auto manufacturers or licenced drivers. If you can carry your keys, wallet or purse with you everytime you leave your home, you can carry a transponder too.
New cars nowadays supply so many things as standard features anyways and if you also haven't noticed a lot of those features suit the bad driver, like parallel parking and blind spot detection.
Complicated? It's already here.
#133
Tragically Ignorant
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,612
Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM
Liked 9,103 Times
in
5,054 Posts
I look forward to the pranks I can pull with a transponder and a small drone.
#135
Over the hill
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 24,426
Bikes: Giant Defy, Giant Revolt
Liked 1,265 Times
in
718 Posts
It's funny. Despite my many years and miles, I still find myself subconsciously hugging the curb or fog line when I should know better, and that's always when I get woken up by a dangerously close pass. I occasionally get honked at when I'm taking the lane, but at least that means they see me and are avoiding me.
__________________
It's like riding a bicycle
It's like riding a bicycle
#136
Full Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Springdale, Arkansas
Posts: 318
Bikes: 2021 Trek Domane SLR7 Project One 62cm- 2010 Specialized Allez 61cm
Liked 88 Times
in
44 Posts
It's funny. Despite my many years and miles, I still find myself subconsciously hugging the curb or fog line when I should know better, and that's always when I get woken up by a dangerously close pass. I occasionally get honked at when I'm taking the lane, but at least that means they see me and are avoiding me.
Unnerving for a while at first, but I think it's actually safer. Better visibility and keeps the cars from doing something they shouldn't do in the first place.
Likes For GAtkins:
#137
Even if I'm taking lane, they still do it, although many are polite enough to move to the next lane and then move back to my lane in front of me, only to be stopped by the red light. I mean why? Completely pointless, I'll just filter through.
Ofc, I only filter through traffic, if vehicles behind me can easily pass me later on.
Ofc, I only filter through traffic, if vehicles behind me can easily pass me later on.
#138
I rode my bike downtown today, to meet friends for dinner
Part of the ride required me to ride in city traffic alongside cars, since no shoulder.
At the red light, my instinct was to run off the road and hide, but I queued at the red light like any other car.
It was not that bad at all.
I chained my bike to a sign post behind a dumpster.
Part of the ride required me to ride in city traffic alongside cars, since no shoulder.
At the red light, my instinct was to run off the road and hide, but I queued at the red light like any other car.
It was not that bad at all.
I chained my bike to a sign post behind a dumpster.
Likes For CheGiantForLife:
#139
Last edited by CheGiantForLife; 08-20-22 at 04:20 AM.
#141
Likes For indyfabz:
#143
Tragically Ignorant
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,612
Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM
Liked 9,103 Times
in
5,054 Posts
Likes For JW Fas:
#145
Rode different route today, and stayed in traffic instead of hiding on the sidewalks.
$8 mirrors also came in handy. Gaining more confidence to stay in traffic, especially at intersections.
$8 mirrors also came in handy. Gaining more confidence to stay in traffic, especially at intersections.
#146
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Lincoln Ne
Posts: 9,924
Bikes: RANS Stratus TerraTrike Tour II
Liked 1,057 Times
in
636 Posts
As of now, if there is no shoulder on either side, I simply do not ride on those roads without an obvious shoulder lane. I currently refuse to ride on roads without a shoulder on at least one side. (or at least grass or sidewalk, where I can walk the bike until shoulder is available on one side) Also, I feel its safer to salmon in a shoulder lane, than to ride with traffic in the actual traffic lane. Shoulder equals safety where you're not an obstacle impediment to cars.
It feels unsafe and borderline reckless to ride in actual traffic where there is no shoulder. For those who ride on roads with no shoulder, how do you deal with the fact that when you're riding with traffic, cars are constantly having to move half way out of the lane you're occupying? If there is not much traffic, this is not a big deal for the car, as there is another entire lane to use for passing the bike. But, during thicker traffic times, where cars are in both lanes, the bike is creating an obstacle on the road and potentially causing car accidents, particularly if there are cars in both lanes and one sideswipes another while having to avoid the bike by swerving into the left lane. Not only is this totally unnerving for the rider, but it creates a real danger for cars. This also applies to one lane roads, where the car must cross over double yellow lines to avoid the bike, thereby risking a fatal head on collision. This is an ethical line I simply can not cross.
Best practices for riding with traffic when there is no shoulder?
It feels unsafe and borderline reckless to ride in actual traffic where there is no shoulder. For those who ride on roads with no shoulder, how do you deal with the fact that when you're riding with traffic, cars are constantly having to move half way out of the lane you're occupying? If there is not much traffic, this is not a big deal for the car, as there is another entire lane to use for passing the bike. But, during thicker traffic times, where cars are in both lanes, the bike is creating an obstacle on the road and potentially causing car accidents, particularly if there are cars in both lanes and one sideswipes another while having to avoid the bike by swerving into the left lane. Not only is this totally unnerving for the rider, but it creates a real danger for cars. This also applies to one lane roads, where the car must cross over double yellow lines to avoid the bike, thereby risking a fatal head on collision. This is an ethical line I simply can not cross.
Best practices for riding with traffic when there is no shoulder?
#147
Full Member
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Denver CO
Posts: 233
Bikes: 2014 Fuji Cross 2.0 LE, 1993 Santana Vision, 1993 Specialized Allez Pro, 1993 Trek 930, 1985 Panasonic DX3000
Liked 75 Times
in
56 Posts
Glad your getting out there into the traffic OP. Just to add to the stories, which have been very interesting, I live in Colorado where cycling is done by many, so I have not had too many issues in the last 17 years riding in traffic. But when I lived in the Dallas/Fort Worth area, I got hit from behind. AND I was on the shoulder!! The key as others have pointed out is visibility, and your ability to see what's happening behind you so great that you have the mirror. I also run a tail light that is super bright in the daytime.
#148
Just did another ride.
At one particular intersection, I still can't resist going salmon in the shoulder instead of waiting at the red light to take a left at the intersection (only to ride in no shoulder)
So, I bypass the intersection by cutting over left before the intersection, doing salmon for 100 feet, and the crossing over into the correct lane.
Also, when there is a shoulder, I can't help but ride in the shoulder instead of in traffic. On a one lane road, this just feels safer. Because it is.
At one particular intersection, I still can't resist going salmon in the shoulder instead of waiting at the red light to take a left at the intersection (only to ride in no shoulder)
So, I bypass the intersection by cutting over left before the intersection, doing salmon for 100 feet, and the crossing over into the correct lane.
Also, when there is a shoulder, I can't help but ride in the shoulder instead of in traffic. On a one lane road, this just feels safer. Because it is.
#149
Tragically Ignorant
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,612
Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM
Liked 9,103 Times
in
5,054 Posts
Just did another ride.
At one particular intersection, I still can't resist going salmon in the shoulder instead of waiting at the red light to take a left at the intersection (only to ride in no shoulder)
So, I bypass the intersection by cutting over left before the intersection, doing salmon for 100 feet, and the crossing over into the correct lane.
Also, when there is a shoulder, I can't help but ride in the shoulder instead of in traffic. On a one lane road, this just feels safer. Because it is.
At one particular intersection, I still can't resist going salmon in the shoulder instead of waiting at the red light to take a left at the intersection (only to ride in no shoulder)
So, I bypass the intersection by cutting over left before the intersection, doing salmon for 100 feet, and the crossing over into the correct lane.
Also, when there is a shoulder, I can't help but ride in the shoulder instead of in traffic. On a one lane road, this just feels safer. Because it is.
For me, the shoulder vs. lane thing is decided on a road-by-road basis.
I'm not going to second-guess you on this but besides avoiding salmoning, I also try to avoid "solutions" that require me to cross the same lanes repeatedly. I look at this as an issue of probabilities, and I figure I'm more statistically likely to get hit if I'm swerving between lanes repeatedly than if I hold a single position in a place visible to drivers. Just as a matter of math, the more lanes I'm crossing, the more cars I'm likely to encounter and, as a practical matter, being unpredictable by swerving around is more likely to cause a problem by confusing the drivers.
#150
Did a 10 mile loop today.
Rode on some single lane double yellows (SLDY)
The roads were not too busy, thankfully, since I can't keep up with 30 mph and creating a hazard for cars.
When there is a shoulder, and I see a car coming up behind me, I cheat over into the shoulder to let the car pass.
Is this bad? Should I stay in the middle of the lane, and force the car to stay behind me?
It is illegal to pass on a DY lane.
Rode on some single lane double yellows (SLDY)
The roads were not too busy, thankfully, since I can't keep up with 30 mph and creating a hazard for cars.
When there is a shoulder, and I see a car coming up behind me, I cheat over into the shoulder to let the car pass.
Is this bad? Should I stay in the middle of the lane, and force the car to stay behind me?
It is illegal to pass on a DY lane.