MUP Etiquette
#51
Senior Member
Here's commuting on the Minuteman Commuter Bikeway. Funny thing happens when it's not a sunny summer Sunday.
(You'll want a couple minutes of your life back. Nothing to fear but squirrels and bunnies.)
-mr. bill
Likes For mr_bill:
#52
Tragically Ignorant
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,612
Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM
Liked 9,103 Times
in
5,054 Posts
No, but it might be a freeway - Cedar Lake Trail.
My point: not all MUPs (non-motor infrastructure) are created equal. Some trails are designed to accommodate more traffic and higher speeds.
But to the point of the OP, don't be a dick! And I've seen this issue cut both ways ... fast riders being a dick cause their chasing some silly Strava segment; and slow riders getting bent outa shape when somebody is obeying all the rules while safely going "too fast".
My point: not all MUPs (non-motor infrastructure) are created equal. Some trails are designed to accommodate more traffic and higher speeds.
But to the point of the OP, don't be a dick! And I've seen this issue cut both ways ... fast riders being a dick cause their chasing some silly Strava segment; and slow riders getting bent outa shape when somebody is obeying all the rules while safely going "too fast".
Likes For livedarklions:
#53
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Northampton, MA
Posts: 1,909
Bikes: 36" Unicycle, winter knock-around hybrid bike
Liked 393 Times
in
282 Posts
That's about what my rail trail is often like.
Funny thing is the one time I rode the Minuteman ages ago, I was really surprised by the number of people walking it after dark. And with the halogen lights of the era you could be right on top of them before seeing them.
Funny thing is the one time I rode the Minuteman ages ago, I was really surprised by the number of people walking it after dark. And with the halogen lights of the era you could be right on top of them before seeing them.
#54
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: San Jose (Willow Glen) Ca
Posts: 10,395
Bikes: Kirk Custom JK Special, '84 Team Miyata,(dura ace old school) 80?? SR Semi-Pro 600 Arabesque
Liked 3,501 Times
in
1,829 Posts
Most people, myself included, that ride our MUPS don't have a bell. I have never found a need for one. When I come up behind someone, I back off the throttle, make verbal contact and pass with minimal speed disparity. I usually say something polite to the people I pass. It has worked flawlessly for me.
__________________
Life is too short not to ride the best bike you have, as much as you can.
Life is too short not to ride the best bike you have, as much as you can.
#55
☢
You can be hit by a car, runover and killed. The driver can then drive home without a single scratch. In fact, that can and has been done to a dozen pedestrians. Do you know of anyone that can do that on a bike? Cyclist don't generate hundreds of horsepower, nor do they weigh tons. What happens to them, happens to you.
Second, in a car you are required by law to report any accident and injury to a person (no matter how minor, and even on private property) to law enforcement and to the DMV. A cyclist on the MUPs has no such specific requirement.
You also don't need to take a driving test, report hearing, vision maladies, and received a license to legally ride a bike. Pedestrians are also prohibited by law from walking in the road, and there are specific legal instructions and restrictions for crossing the road properly.
Third, if cyclist are required to yield to every pedestrian then its not a MUP, its a sidewalk. In that case, pedestrians can occupy the entire MUP and walk in any direction, way, form, or fashion they please. Cycling would at best be inefficient, at worst blocked completely.
Finally, the MUP origins was as bikesways. The "MUP" designation developed subsequently, and as in no small amount, a measure of political correctness.
Second, in a car you are required by law to report any accident and injury to a person (no matter how minor, and even on private property) to law enforcement and to the DMV. A cyclist on the MUPs has no such specific requirement.
You also don't need to take a driving test, report hearing, vision maladies, and received a license to legally ride a bike. Pedestrians are also prohibited by law from walking in the road, and there are specific legal instructions and restrictions for crossing the road properly.
Third, if cyclist are required to yield to every pedestrian then its not a MUP, its a sidewalk. In that case, pedestrians can occupy the entire MUP and walk in any direction, way, form, or fashion they please. Cycling would at best be inefficient, at worst blocked completely.
Finally, the MUP origins was as bikesways. The "MUP" designation developed subsequently, and as in no small amount, a measure of political correctness.
#56
Been Around Awhile
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Burlington Iowa
Posts: 30,123
Bikes: Vaterland and Ragazzi
Liked 1,651 Times
in
1,112 Posts
Likes For I-Like-To-Bike:
#57
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Northampton, MA
Posts: 1,909
Bikes: 36" Unicycle, winter knock-around hybrid bike
Liked 393 Times
in
282 Posts
It's pretty obvious many of KraneXL's opinions above are in direct contradiction with applicable law, but that's unlikely to be something anyone here can convince them of.
#58
For The Fun of It
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Louisissippi Coast
Posts: 5,910
Bikes: Lynskey GR300, Lynskey Backroad, Litespeed T6, Lynskey MT29, Burley Duet
Liked 1,746 Times
in
864 Posts
A bell is universally recognizable as a cyclist approaching. Not only that its highly directional so its easy to tell what direction he's approaching from. Not only that, but may be required by law as operable equipment in some states.
Not at all an appropriate similarity. And the assumption that the cyclist is somehow more responsible on a MUP is frankly offensive. When it comes to safety, they are both EQUALLY responsible.
Not at all an appropriate similarity. And the assumption that the cyclist is somehow more responsible on a MUP is frankly offensive. When it comes to safety, they are both EQUALLY responsible.
Likes For Paul Barnard:
#59
☢
It's not required by law here. It's no more "directional" than my voice, and it communicates nothing to the uninitiated. With my voice, they will hear "I am easing around your left." I never have had anyone do anything unpredictable with that. I am prepared for it, but it has yet to happen. I ride with someone who uses her bell. When she comes up behind people and rings the bell, most move to the right. Some move left. Some have wheeled around to see where the noise came from. Groups have split in both directions. I suppose that could all be a function of people not using bells much here. I certainly won't be abandoning the practice that has served me well to assume one that has yielded less favorable results.
Under customs and courtesies, and when no other rule or regulations are present. Of course posted requirements are always applied first.
Last edited by KraneXL; 05-22-19 at 01:08 AM. Reason: clarify sentence
#60
Tragically Ignorant
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,612
Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM
Liked 9,103 Times
in
5,054 Posts
On the contrary, they are directly or indirectly linked to laws. Laws come first, in which case there is no debate. In their absence, these are the customs and courtesies (basically what's being discussed here) that apply.
There is no guarantee that people will move appropriately, but they do instantly recognize the bell sound as an approaching cyclist. Verbal commands, on the other hand, have to be interpreted then carried out. That is, if they're heard it clearly the first time.
Under customs and courtesies, and when no other rule or regulations are present. Of course posted requirements are always applied first.
There is no guarantee that people will move appropriately, but they do instantly recognize the bell sound as an approaching cyclist. Verbal commands, on the other hand, have to be interpreted then carried out. That is, if they're heard it clearly the first time.
Under customs and courtesies, and when no other rule or regulations are present. Of course posted requirements are always applied first.
I do most of my riding in MA. State law is quite clear that giving pedestrians the right of way and audibly signalling a pass is mandatory. These are not customs or courtesies, they're in the basic bicycle statute.
I'm responding to a couple of your posts here, but forgot to check multiquote and don't want to start over.
Please stop pretending expertise in areas you're not especially knowledgeable about. Reporting requirements for motor vehicle accidents are really irrelevant to responsibility for accidents, and probably have more to do with insurance company interests than with safety concerns.
Your original statement was that it was "offensive" to state that bicyclists had greater responsibility than pedestrians on an MUP. Since that was obviously stupid and contrary to law, you've now shifted your argument to "bikes are not perfectly analogous to cars". Well, duh.
#61
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 15,929
Bikes: 2015 Workswell 066, 2017 Workswell 093, 2014 Dawes Sheila, 1983 Cannondale 500, 1984 Raleigh Olympian, 2007 Cannondale Rize 4, 2017 Fuji Sportif 1 LE
Liked 3,934 Times
in
2,053 Posts
Most of the time the person or persons did Nothing, because they were wearing earbuds and couldn't have heard a bell or a shout. In that case they were always startled when I passed ... but expecting this, I never passed close enough that they could jump into my path.
Seriously, if people cannot manage riding on MUPs, they should stay home and watch TV.
As other posters may or may not notice, I usually don't bother with KraneXL because he intermittently denies reality. I do it here, not thinking I will convince him to accept fact, but for the fun of it. I assume he will do his best to post some "wicked burn" about how wrong I am and that is fine.
But yeah .. MUPs are sidewalks. Exactly that. And as with sidewalks, bicycles are allowed and Pedestrians Have the Right of Way and cyclists Must yield.
Regardless of who denies it.
#62
Tragically Ignorant
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,612
Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM
Liked 9,103 Times
in
5,054 Posts
So, by law, pedestrians are allowed on MUPs, and bicycles are required to take special precautions to ensure their safety.
Tell you what, show us any law that indicates that pedestrians have any special responsibility to protect the safety of cyclists on a MUP and you might have a point. You might be able to dig something up regarding dogs and leashes, but presumably those rules would apply to cyclists with dogs as well (if cyclists are actually allowed to ride with dogs on leashes at all), so they won't count.
#63
Tragically Ignorant
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,612
Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM
Liked 9,103 Times
in
5,054 Posts
Y'know what's hilarious? All the times I've seen someone ringing a bell repeatedly on the Minuteman getting no reaction from the people ahead of them, and then having to say "passing on your left" or "please move over" to get people to move.
Never, ever have I seen the opposite occur.
A bell conveys two pieces of information--someone has a bell, and (probably) that person is behind you. The idea that it conveys a clearer message than "passing on your left" is completely illogical.
I am sure that people vary in their ability to state clearly and audibly a signal of what they're doing, and people who find that difficult might very well have a rational preference to use a bell, but that doesn't justify making ridiculous claims about noises conveying meanings better than actual words.
My experience, btw, is that bells vary a lot more in volume than do human voices, so I find it much harder to figure out the distance of a bell behind me than I do an actual human speaking.
Never, ever have I seen the opposite occur.
A bell conveys two pieces of information--someone has a bell, and (probably) that person is behind you. The idea that it conveys a clearer message than "passing on your left" is completely illogical.
I am sure that people vary in their ability to state clearly and audibly a signal of what they're doing, and people who find that difficult might very well have a rational preference to use a bell, but that doesn't justify making ridiculous claims about noises conveying meanings better than actual words.
My experience, btw, is that bells vary a lot more in volume than do human voices, so I find it much harder to figure out the distance of a bell behind me than I do an actual human speaking.
#64
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Northampton, MA
Posts: 1,909
Bikes: 36" Unicycle, winter knock-around hybrid bike
Liked 393 Times
in
282 Posts
While I know of a town that is an exception in having an ordinance specifically addressing MUPs, I'm not convinced that the regulatory situation on MUPs is generally that different than it is on sidewalk-less secondary roadways where walking and cycling are permitted. Pedestrians have the right of way, yes, but also a practical requirement to remain aware of their surroundings - unpredictably jumping in front of cars does not tend to end well for pedestrians, either.
This is mostly a sign of uneducated pedestrians. Most of those on my trail are more experienced - those, and people from "cycling cultures" seem to respond quite well. But perhaps I should opt for voice more with those who are not. My bell broke off early on Thursday's ride forcing voice only but I'd repaired it for Saturday's and Sunday's, don't recall a real difference in reactions.
And I have no problem with someone routinely choosing voice over bell - even where a bell is required to be fitted, I don't recall seeing language requiring that it be used instead of voice.
In some cases however I suspect little but a foghorn would pierce the veil of situational ignorance.
Last edited by UniChris; 05-22-19 at 08:07 AM.
#65
Senior Member
Originally Posted by Title III Public and Private Ways
Article 1: Public Ways
Section 5: Vehicles on Sidewalk
No person shall operate any vehicle excepting children's carriages and tricycles upon any sidewalk.
Section 5: Vehicles on Sidewalk
No person shall operate any vehicle excepting children's carriages and tricycles upon any sidewalk.
The Minuteman Commuter Bikeway allows Bicycles (shocking, huh).
The Minuteman Commuter Bikeway traverses Arlington MA.
Arlington MA prohibits bicycles on Sidewalks.
Therefore, the Minuteman Commuter Bikeway is not a sidewalk.
As far as the bell versus "on your left", Massachusetts requires an "audible signal" which can be a bell or voice or... (but not whistle or siren):
Ring My Bell:
Dance on a Volcano (fast forward to 2:30 if you wish):
-mr. bill
#66
Tragically Ignorant
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,612
Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM
Liked 9,103 Times
in
5,054 Posts
From Arlington MA bylaws:
The Minuteman Commuter Bikeway is a MUP.
The Minuteman Commuter Bikeway allows Bicycles (shocking, huh).
The Minuteman Commuter Bikeway traverses Arlington MA.
Arlington MA prohibits bicycles on Sidewalks.
Therefore, the Minuteman Commuter Bikeway is not a sidewalk.
As far as the bell versus "on your left", Massachusetts requires an "audible signal" which can be a bell or voice or... (but not whistle or siren):
Ring My Bell:
Ring My Bell
Dance on a Volcano (fast forward to 2:30 if you wish):
Dance on a Volcano
-mr. bill
The Minuteman Commuter Bikeway is a MUP.
The Minuteman Commuter Bikeway allows Bicycles (shocking, huh).
The Minuteman Commuter Bikeway traverses Arlington MA.
Arlington MA prohibits bicycles on Sidewalks.
Therefore, the Minuteman Commuter Bikeway is not a sidewalk.
As far as the bell versus "on your left", Massachusetts requires an "audible signal" which can be a bell or voice or... (but not whistle or siren):
Ring My Bell:
Ring My Bell
Dance on a Volcano (fast forward to 2:30 if you wish):
Dance on a Volcano
-mr. bill
Mass. law explicitly allows riding on sidewalks under most circumstances.
Arguably, the state code is drafted such that the Minuteman Bikeway doesn't fit the state's definition of a bikeway (Part 1, Title XIV, Chapter 90e Section 1:
"''Bike path'', a route for the exclusive use of bicycles separated by grade or other physical barrier from motor traffic.
''Bike lane'', a lane on a street restricted to bicycles and so designated by means of painted lines, pavement coloring or other appropriate markings.
''Bike route'', a roadway shared by both bicycles and other forms of transportation designated by the means of signs or pavement markings.
''Bikeway'', bike paths, bike lanes and bike routes.
Technically, I don't think the Minuteman is a bike path, bike lane or bike route. The latter 2 are definitely roads or parts of streets or roads, and a bike path requires the "exclusive use" of bicycles, and pedestrians are allowed on the Minuteman, hence the bicycle use is not "exclusive".
I'm almost certain I'm missing something, and you'll know what it is. But as far as I can tell, sidewalk riding rules are, for purposes of MA state law, the ones to be applied to MUPs.
#67
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 15,929
Bikes: 2015 Workswell 066, 2017 Workswell 093, 2014 Dawes Sheila, 1983 Cannondale 500, 1984 Raleigh Olympian, 2007 Cannondale Rize 4, 2017 Fuji Sportif 1 LE
Liked 3,934 Times
in
2,053 Posts
Different states and cities have different laws regarding cycling on the sidewalk .... one of the first things I do when I move is research bicycle laws. For a while when iwas traversing two or three municipalities on my various commutes, I would be subject to two or three completely different equipment and operation requirements ... some cities required bells, which are absolutely worthless in traffic, and some allowed sidewalk cycling which is absolutely dangerous for commuters and pedestrians .... But as far as it goes, an MUP is a sidewalk where some vehicles are allowed in the sense that it is regulated according to the needs of pedestrians---people who walk. Everyone else has to accommodate the people who walk ... as on any sidewalk where vehicles are allowed.
We are both too smart to start googling different definitions of "sidewalk" and comapring laws from town to town. i think we can both understand that Anywhere pedestrians are permitted to travel, pedestrians get the right of way and other vehicles are charged with avoiding and not endangering pedestrians, while pedestrians are legally considered to be essentially harmless ... and yes, if someone chose, he or she could parse that sentence word by word and quibble over each word ....
I have never heard of any MUPs where bicycles are given the primary right of way and everyone else has to move aside for them. Every MUP I have used or heard about has signs somewhere saying specifically that all other traffic must defer to pedestrians. But then, I have never ridden an MUP in 99.9 percent of this country and never in any other country ... though I have walked in a lot of other countries. In China I got a ride in a cab whose driver went right up onto the sidewalk to make a turn around traffic. Luckily he didn't hit any Flying Pigeons. Not sure if there were signs posted about pedestrian right-of-way on those sidewalks ... but the cyclists all rode int he streets.
We are both too smart to start googling different definitions of "sidewalk" and comapring laws from town to town. i think we can both understand that Anywhere pedestrians are permitted to travel, pedestrians get the right of way and other vehicles are charged with avoiding and not endangering pedestrians, while pedestrians are legally considered to be essentially harmless ... and yes, if someone chose, he or she could parse that sentence word by word and quibble over each word ....
I have never heard of any MUPs where bicycles are given the primary right of way and everyone else has to move aside for them. Every MUP I have used or heard about has signs somewhere saying specifically that all other traffic must defer to pedestrians. But then, I have never ridden an MUP in 99.9 percent of this country and never in any other country ... though I have walked in a lot of other countries. In China I got a ride in a cab whose driver went right up onto the sidewalk to make a turn around traffic. Luckily he didn't hit any Flying Pigeons. Not sure if there were signs posted about pedestrian right-of-way on those sidewalks ... but the cyclists all rode int he streets.
#68
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: NE Tennessee
Posts: 917
Bikes: Giant TCR/Surly Karate Monkey/Foundry FireTower/Curtlo Tandem
Liked 84 Times
in
62 Posts
The closest thing that we have to a "MUP" around here is the Tweetsie trail. A rail to trail from Johnson City down into Elizabethton.
After the last few "MUP" related posts, I can say that I am glad that I have never ridden nor need to ever ride it.
After the last few "MUP" related posts, I can say that I am glad that I have never ridden nor need to ever ride it.
#69
Tragically Ignorant
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,612
Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM
Liked 9,103 Times
in
5,054 Posts
I don't know that trail, but from what I can glean online, it's exactly the kind that usually is the best--between two towns, and somewhat rural. MUP riding is great depending on your expectations. I do it recreationally a lot, and depending on location and time of day, I find I can often do it quite safely cruising in the high 20-30 mph range for a few miles. You just need to be prepared to slow down when you encounter traffic, just like riding anywhere else.
Even the busiest urban path is not likely populated much before 8 a.m. on a weekend, BTW.
Most of the whining about pedestrians and slower bikes on the MUP is from people who think they're entitled to a private track. I have to ride out of the city to get roads where I can ride as fast uninterrupted for as long.
Don't let any of the nonsense on this thread keep you from trying it.
Likes For livedarklions:
#70
Senior Member
In Bike/Pedestrian/Horse, Bike yields to Pedestrian. Bike yields to Horse. Pedestrian yields to Horse. (Horse is the one mode that rules them all.)
Further - "every operator of a vehicle shall exercise due care to avoid colliding with any pedestrian upon the roadway." Therefore, by your "logic" roads are sidewalks.
-mr. bill
#71
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 15,929
Bikes: 2015 Workswell 066, 2017 Workswell 093, 2014 Dawes Sheila, 1983 Cannondale 500, 1984 Raleigh Olympian, 2007 Cannondale Rize 4, 2017 Fuji Sportif 1 LE
Liked 3,934 Times
in
2,053 Posts
Out of here. I was worried this would go this way. You win, you are the greatest, all bow down away from you ... or maybe they are all just mooning you. Whatever.
#72
Senior Member
Arguably, the state code is drafted such that the Minuteman Bikeway doesn't fit the state's definition of a bikeway (Part 1, Title XIV, Chapter 90e Section 1:
"''Bike path'', a route for the exclusive use of bicycles separated by grade or other physical barrier from motor traffic."
...a bike path requires the "exclusive use" of bicycles, and pedestrians are allowed on the Minuteman, hence the bicycle use is not "exclusive".
"''Bike path'', a route for the exclusive use of bicycles separated by grade or other physical barrier from motor traffic."
...a bike path requires the "exclusive use" of bicycles, and pedestrians are allowed on the Minuteman, hence the bicycle use is not "exclusive".
More generally, when looking at the definition, since bikeways like the Minuteman are specifically INCLUDED in the scope of the chapter, you would be wise to consider that your interpretation of the definition which EXCLUDES bikeways like the Minuteman is likely in error.
See MGL Chapter 90E, Section 2. Specifically....
The commissioner shall establish... a bikeways program which shall include, but not be limited to:
the use of abandoned rights of way for bicycle paths;
the development of commuter and recreational trails;
...promulgation of... ...regulations for... [the] use of bicycles.
the use of abandoned rights of way for bicycle paths;
the development of commuter and recreational trails;
...promulgation of... ...regulations for... [the] use of bicycles.
However, there are MANY OTHER bikeways/rail trails where the regulations come from another entity, specifically now the DCR, formerly MDC. These cover paths such as the well used Paul D. White bikepath, the Cape Cod Rail Trail, the Norwottuck Rail Trail, Alewife Brook Path, etc....
You can actually FIND these regulations at 302 CMR 12.
Specifically about the "controversial" bell/"on your left" question:
(3) When passing others on a trail, trail users shall alert others with audible signals such as by voice, bell or horn.
-mr. bill
Last edited by mr_bill; 05-22-19 at 12:00 PM.
#73
Tragically Ignorant
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,612
Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM
Liked 9,103 Times
in
5,054 Posts
Again, free internut legal advice is worth every penny. Consult a professional. But you must consider locally the context of "exclusive," that is "motor traffic." If the phrase included "motor traffic and pedestrians" you might have an argument.
More generally, when looking at the definition, since bikeways like the Minuteman are specifically INCLUDED in the scope of the chapter, you would be wise to consider that your interpretation of the definition which EXCLUDES bikeways like the Minuteman is likely in error.
See MGL Chapter 90E, Section 2. Specifically....
Now, FINDING the regulations for the use of bicycles on the bikepaths is... ...interesting. But if you look at those signs conveniently posted, there they are. (The are *NOT* simply "etiquette.")
However, there are MANY OTHER bikeways/rail trails where the regulations come from another entity, specifically now the DCR, formerly MDC. These cover paths such as the well used Paul D. White bikepath, the Cape Cod Rail Trail, the Norwottuck Rail Trail, Alewife Brook Path, etc....
You can actually FIND these regulations at 302 CMR 12.
Specifically about the "controversial" bell/"on your left" question:
It's simple. MUPs are not sidewalks. No matter how many times people who don't ride on MUPs insist that they are.
-mr. bill
More generally, when looking at the definition, since bikeways like the Minuteman are specifically INCLUDED in the scope of the chapter, you would be wise to consider that your interpretation of the definition which EXCLUDES bikeways like the Minuteman is likely in error.
See MGL Chapter 90E, Section 2. Specifically....
Now, FINDING the regulations for the use of bicycles on the bikepaths is... ...interesting. But if you look at those signs conveniently posted, there they are. (The are *NOT* simply "etiquette.")
However, there are MANY OTHER bikeways/rail trails where the regulations come from another entity, specifically now the DCR, formerly MDC. These cover paths such as the well used Paul D. White bikepath, the Cape Cod Rail Trail, the Norwottuck Rail Trail, Alewife Brook Path, etc....
You can actually FIND these regulations at 302 CMR 12.
Specifically about the "controversial" bell/"on your left" question:
It's simple. MUPs are not sidewalks. No matter how many times people who don't ride on MUPs insist that they are.
-mr. bill
If I understand you correctly, the Minuteman is not a sidewalk, therefore the provisions in the basic bike statute requiring ROW to pedestrians and audibly signalling a pass don't apply as they specifically apply to a sidewalk. You seem to indicate that the CMR section you linked to doesn't apply because the Minuteman is not under the DCR's jurisdiction, and you linked a statute indicating that the regs regarding use of bicycles on bikeways "shall" be promulgated by the Commissioner of Highways. Only one problem with this--there's no evidence that the Commissioner has ever done this--they're not in the CMR. You know as well as I do that the MA APA requires that regulations are promulgated in the CMR not just on path-side signs, and that if the Department of Highways hasn't promulgated them properly, the regulation doesn't exist. So, using your logic, we now have a situation where I am required by regulation to give pedestrians the ROW on the Paul Dudley White, but not on the Minuteman. OOOPS!
Did I miss something?
So, simple challenge now that I feel insulted, show me some actual promulgated law or regulation that clearly states the ROW rules on the Minuteman ("look at the signs" is not a correct answer).
I don't know why you think I don't ride on MUPs, btw, I do it several times a week.
Last edited by livedarklions; 05-22-19 at 02:13 PM.
#74
Senior Member
Again, if you want legal advice, hire someone.
You can deconstruct a statute all you want, but when your “plausible” construction runs into facts on the ground....
Time for you to cite a decision that MUPs are sidewalks.
(Yes, you ride on MUPs. I ride on MUPs. The thread-hijacker doesn’t, or hasn’t for years, and pigeons in China?)
-mr. bill
You can deconstruct a statute all you want, but when your “plausible” construction runs into facts on the ground....
Time for you to cite a decision that MUPs are sidewalks.
(Yes, you ride on MUPs. I ride on MUPs. The thread-hijacker doesn’t, or hasn’t for years, and pigeons in China?)
-mr. bill
#75
Tragically Ignorant
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,612
Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM
Liked 9,103 Times
in
5,054 Posts
Again, if you want legal advice, hire someone.
You can deconstruct a statute all you want, but when your “plausible” construction runs into facts on the ground....
Time for you to cite a decision that MUPs are sidewalks.
(Yes, you ride on MUPs. I ride on MUPs. The thread-hijacker doesn’t, or hasn’t for years, and pigeons in China?)
-mr. bill
You can deconstruct a statute all you want, but when your “plausible” construction runs into facts on the ground....
Time for you to cite a decision that MUPs are sidewalks.
(Yes, you ride on MUPs. I ride on MUPs. The thread-hijacker doesn’t, or hasn’t for years, and pigeons in China?)
-mr. bill