Just started training with Power? Post your questions/comments here!
#26
RustyTainte
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: 28012
Posts: 12,340
Bikes: zilch
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Include zeroes. For example, last year I did a crit @ 302w AP, 345w NP, and my PT (not including zeroes) reported something like 386w.
It's not an accurate reflection of work done over time, as if you're coasting with 0 power a lot and sprinting the rest of the time the readings will be really goofy.
It's not an accurate reflection of work done over time, as if you're coasting with 0 power a lot and sprinting the rest of the time the readings will be really goofy.
#28
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Posts: 28,387
Bikes: Specialized Tarmac SL2, Specialized Tarmac SL, Giant TCR Composite, Specialized StumpJumper Expert HT
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
Include zeros in averages. I only excluded them from the distribution chart I showed because there was a lot of descending/coasting and it obscured the bins in the distribution... the distribution shape is not affected by the zeros but the scale of the chart is...
#29
RustyTainte
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: 28012
Posts: 12,340
Bikes: zilch
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Well, I forgot how to put them back in.
#30
Batüwü Creakcreak
Thread Starter
Perhaps go this route and then sell the ibike or hold onto it since it's going to be way cheaper than time in the tunnel. You could probably use it during a race to adjust if it gets gusty and such.
#31
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Posts: 28,387
Bikes: Specialized Tarmac SL2, Specialized Tarmac SL, Giant TCR Composite, Specialized StumpJumper Expert HT
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
If anything, your best bet is an Ibike since you'll get real time drag data if you use it with a powermeter.
Perhaps go this route and then sell the ibike or hold onto it since it's going to be way cheaper than time in the tunnel. You could probably use it during a race to adjust if it gets gusty and such.
Perhaps go this route and then sell the ibike or hold onto it since it's going to be way cheaper than time in the tunnel. You could probably use it during a race to adjust if it gets gusty and such.
#32
slow up hills
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 4,931
Bikes: Giant TCR, Redline CX, Ritchey Breakaway, Spec S-works epic
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#33
Writin' stuff
yeah... no extra money so buying more equipment is pretty much out of the question. I use what is given to me.
I was hoping someone had a protocol that had helped them find a good position, but I guess I'll just have to invent one on my own I'll let you all know how it goes.
I was hoping someone had a protocol that had helped them find a good position, but I guess I'll just have to invent one on my own I'll let you all know how it goes.
#34
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Posts: 28,387
Bikes: Specialized Tarmac SL2, Specialized Tarmac SL, Giant TCR Composite, Specialized StumpJumper Expert HT
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
I'm pretty sure all the software is already available. That's what Tom has been doing. Note that the iBike acts as the head unit so if someone got a Quarq, they could get the iBike instead of the Garmin, and the cost would be about the same. And you wouldn't need a Quarq, you could do it with the ANT+Sport PT as well.
#35
Senior Member
You might want to look in at the Wattage group at Google. There's been a lot of work done already and software is available.
#39
No matches
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Eastern PA
Posts: 11,647
Bikes: two wheeled ones
Liked 444 Times
in
250 Posts
My parents want to buy me something for Christmas. I don't really want anything right now except a power meter. I doubt they'll buy me something expensive.
Something I considered is asking them for an iBike, and then I can pair it with a PT (or Quark) that I buy next summer when I have money. Is the only iBike that can do the CdA thing the newest iAero III? Are there cheaper (older) versions that are still ANT+ compatible and can calculate the CdA when paired with a direct measurement power meter?
I might ask for a Garmin 705 instead, which I can pair with my power meter when I get it. The CdA would be cool though, maybe I'll buy something to do that with in a couple years.
I wish they'd just pick a number and give me some cash.
Something I considered is asking them for an iBike, and then I can pair it with a PT (or Quark) that I buy next summer when I have money. Is the only iBike that can do the CdA thing the newest iAero III? Are there cheaper (older) versions that are still ANT+ compatible and can calculate the CdA when paired with a direct measurement power meter?
I might ask for a Garmin 705 instead, which I can pair with my power meter when I get it. The CdA would be cool though, maybe I'll buy something to do that with in a couple years.
I wish they'd just pick a number and give me some cash.
#40
Batüwü Creakcreak
Thread Starter
My parents want to buy me something for Christmas. I don't really want anything right now except a power meter. I doubt they'll buy me something expensive.
Something I considered is asking them for an iBike, and then I can pair it with a PT (or Quark) that I buy next summer when I have money. Is the only iBike that can do the CdA thing the newest iAero III? Are there cheaper (older) versions that are still ANT+ compatible and can calculate the CdA when paired with a direct measurement power meter?
I might ask for a Garmin 705 instead, which I can pair with my power meter when I get it. The CdA would be cool though, maybe I'll buy something to do that with in a couple years.
I wish they'd just pick a number and give me some cash.
Something I considered is asking them for an iBike, and then I can pair it with a PT (or Quark) that I buy next summer when I have money. Is the only iBike that can do the CdA thing the newest iAero III? Are there cheaper (older) versions that are still ANT+ compatible and can calculate the CdA when paired with a direct measurement power meter?
I might ask for a Garmin 705 instead, which I can pair with my power meter when I get it. The CdA would be cool though, maybe I'll buy something to do that with in a couple years.
I wish they'd just pick a number and give me some cash.
#41
I'm pretty sure all the software is already available. That's what Tom has been doing. Note that the iBike acts as the head unit so if someone got a Quarq, they could get the iBike instead of the Garmin, and the cost would be about the same. And you wouldn't need a Quarq, you could do it with the ANT+Sport PT as well.
https://anonymous.coward.free.fr/watt...direct-cda.pdf
The iAero +ANT Sport setup just lets you sort of do it "real time"...
Last edited by tanhalt; 11-24-08 at 06:04 PM.
#43
Batüwü Creakcreak
Thread Starter
#44
VeloSIRraptor
RTC - thanks for starting the thread.
*bookmarked*
I'm slow at getting any questions - but that's because my training is focused on running for the last weeks - but starting this weekend I'll be full of them.
*bookmarked*
I'm slow at getting any questions - but that's because my training is focused on running for the last weeks - but starting this weekend I'll be full of them.
#45
slow up hills
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 4,931
Bikes: Giant TCR, Redline CX, Ritchey Breakaway, Spec S-works epic
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
"fixed" my slope -- it was reading 15.9 Hz/Nm, but according to my 2 gallons of water, it should say between 19.9 and 20.2. I went with 20.2 so that later, I can get free power if I underestimated the mass of the 2 gallons of water + bottles. I had called SRM, and the last time they say the meter was more than 3 years ago, and the number they had in their system was 15.9. I'm pretty sure there has been some drift.
Using this new calibration I went out to do a recovery ride after the 3200kJ epicness that was yesterday's ride. I arbitrarily picked 200W as my max/average wattage. Going uphill at 200W is painfully boring, but as soon as the road turns down, it seems like I have to actually work to maintain that number. I guess that's why people around here stay out of the hills on recovery days.
btw, this puts my max 5s sprint UNDER 1000W, which makes me cry a little inside. "I" think i'm a sprinter, but my 5 and 20 minutes numbers are much better on the chart. I haven't actually gone out to test yet, I'm just taking the bests from my rides. Tomorrow I'm going to do one or two "WRI"s (tm) to get a 1m number that qualifies as something besides untrained
Using this new calibration I went out to do a recovery ride after the 3200kJ epicness that was yesterday's ride. I arbitrarily picked 200W as my max/average wattage. Going uphill at 200W is painfully boring, but as soon as the road turns down, it seems like I have to actually work to maintain that number. I guess that's why people around here stay out of the hills on recovery days.
btw, this puts my max 5s sprint UNDER 1000W, which makes me cry a little inside. "I" think i'm a sprinter, but my 5 and 20 minutes numbers are much better on the chart. I haven't actually gone out to test yet, I'm just taking the bests from my rides. Tomorrow I'm going to do one or two "WRI"s (tm) to get a 1m number that qualifies as something besides untrained
#46
Batüwü Creakcreak
Thread Starter
What did you do, 1 gallon on each crank arm?
My unit was sent to SRM in march by the previous owner and the slope is 19.3.
#47
slow up hills
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 4,931
Bikes: Giant TCR, Redline CX, Ritchey Breakaway, Spec S-works epic
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
tied a string through the handle of each one and hung them off the SAME crankarm (although doing it on both sides would provide me a balance of sorts).
#48
Too Much Crazy
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: NY
Posts: 3,660
Bikes: Eriksen 29er, Gunnar Roadie, Niner RLT, Niner RIP 9
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
2 Posts
So I did my 20 minute test on my cycle ops fluid 2 trainer on wed.
Take a look at this graph please. Is it too upward sloping? I mean, did I hold back to much in the beginning and then hammer too much at the end?
It seemed like at around 10 minutes it just got easier to hold higher wattage. And then the last 5 I just went pretty much as hard as I could go , within reason
So, I guess my question is, was this a pretty good initial test?
the actual test is from 41-61 minutes
Take a look at this graph please. Is it too upward sloping? I mean, did I hold back to much in the beginning and then hammer too much at the end?
It seemed like at around 10 minutes it just got easier to hold higher wattage. And then the last 5 I just went pretty much as hard as I could go , within reason
So, I guess my question is, was this a pretty good initial test?
the actual test is from 41-61 minutes
Last edited by C Law; 11-28-08 at 03:50 PM.
#49
Batüwü Creakcreak
Thread Starter
So basically, you're not going to be at a loss if your FTP is a little lower than it actually is.
If you want, do a MAP test tomorrow and see if 72-75% of that wattage is close to 95% of your 20minute. If it is, then great, you're in the ballpark. You can retest in a month or so, but use the current number to structure workouts. If the 'hard' workouts seem too easy, then you know you've got something going.
Also, if you're holding 300+ for your 20 minute test, you're not warming up hard enough. Most of your warmup is in the sub 200 watt zone. You should be warming up in the 220-240 zone methinks.
Good test!
If you want, do a MAP test tomorrow and see if 72-75% of that wattage is close to 95% of your 20minute. If it is, then great, you're in the ballpark. You can retest in a month or so, but use the current number to structure workouts. If the 'hard' workouts seem too easy, then you know you've got something going.
Also, if you're holding 300+ for your 20 minute test, you're not warming up hard enough. Most of your warmup is in the sub 200 watt zone. You should be warming up in the 220-240 zone methinks.
Good test!
#50
Too Much Crazy
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: NY
Posts: 3,660
Bikes: Eriksen 29er, Gunnar Roadie, Niner RLT, Niner RIP 9
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
2 Posts
So basically, you're not going to be at a loss if your FTP is a little lower than it actually is.
If you want, do a MAP test tomorrow and see if 72-75% of that wattage is close to 95% of your 20minute. If it is, then great, you're in the ballpark. You can retest in a month or so, but use the current number to structure workouts. If the 'hard' workouts seem too easy, then you know you've got something going.
Also, if you're holding 300+ for your 20 minute test, you're not warming up hard enough. Most of your warmup is in the sub 200 watt zone. You should be warming up in the 220-240 zone methinks.
Good test!
If you want, do a MAP test tomorrow and see if 72-75% of that wattage is close to 95% of your 20minute. If it is, then great, you're in the ballpark. You can retest in a month or so, but use the current number to structure workouts. If the 'hard' workouts seem too easy, then you know you've got something going.
Also, if you're holding 300+ for your 20 minute test, you're not warming up hard enough. Most of your warmup is in the sub 200 watt zone. You should be warming up in the 220-240 zone methinks.
Good test!
I was hoping it was a good starting point to structure some workouts from. I'll retest at the end of Jan. and see where I'm at.