Maybe we need a 40+ and a 60+ set of subfora?
#1
ignominious poltroon
Thread Starter
Maybe we need a 40+ and a 60+ set of subfora?
Nature Aging has a report that has seen a lot of coverage in the popular press. Link.
The claim is that decline with age is not a linear progression, but rather that there are two steep drop-offs, one of which is in your 40s, and the other one in your early 60s.
The claim is that decline with age is not a linear progression, but rather that there are two steep drop-offs, one of which is in your 40s, and the other one in your early 60s.
#2
ignominious poltroon
Thread Starter
Here is a general audience news report:
https://www.theguardian.com/science/...low-and-steady
https://www.theguardian.com/science/...low-and-steady
Scientists find humans age dramatically in two bursts – at 44, then 60
US findings suggesting ageing is not a slow and steady process could explain spikes in health issues at certain ages
#3
Sr Member on Sr bikes
At 63, and an athlete since my early teens, I will say that approximately those two ages is when I saw the most dramatic changes in athletic performance.
Dan
Dan
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: northern Deep South
Posts: 9,153
Bikes: Fuji Touring, Novara Randonee
Liked 2,156 Times
in
1,328 Posts
While I understand the rationale, I suspect splitting one forum broadly read and posted, into two or three would see one or more languishing. See Early brifter for an example that honestly didn't work.
#5
ignominious poltroon
Thread Starter
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: South shore, L.I., NY
Posts: 7,307
Bikes: Flyxii FR322, Cannondale Topstone, Miyata City Liner, Specialized Chisel, Specialized Epic Evo
Liked 2,386 Times
in
1,348 Posts
There's a 55+ section. Really wants a +70 or +75 section
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2021
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 2,140
Bikes: addict, aethos, creo, vanmoof, sirrus, public ...
Liked 1,482 Times
in
755 Posts
Would be really interesting to see the data to understand the specificity of the two ages. Is that an average/median of a wider period in which changes accelerated, or something really specific and sudden. The latter is hard to imagine, given that most things we do vary from person to person in quantity over time - heartbeats, breaths, steps, infections, orgasms, etc. about the only thing which is fixed over time is nights of sleep.
if everyone’s body goes into “decay” mode after waking up 16,000 times, it would be really interesting and potentially easy to change!
if everyone’s body goes into “decay” mode after waking up 16,000 times, it would be really interesting and potentially easy to change!
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: northern Deep South
Posts: 9,153
Bikes: Fuji Touring, Novara Randonee
Liked 2,156 Times
in
1,328 Posts
Likes For pdlamb:
#9
ignominious poltroon
Thread Starter
https://www.nature.com/articles/s43587-024-00692-2
Is that an average/median of a wider period in which changes accelerated, or something really specific and sudden. The latter is hard to imagine, given that most things we do vary from person to person in quantity over time - heartbeats, breaths, steps, infections, orgasms, etc. about the only thing which is fixed over time is nights of sleep.
if everyone’s body goes into “decay” mode after waking up 16,000 times, it would be really interesting and potentially easy to change!
I agree it interesting. I don't think it will be easy to change.
Likes For gobicycling:
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2021
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 2,140
Bikes: addict, aethos, creo, vanmoof, sirrus, public ...
Liked 1,482 Times
in
755 Posts
That is why I posted the link to the Nature Aging article.
https://www.nature.com/articles/s43587-024-00692-2
Sudden. At age 44 and again at 60. That's why it is interesting. It might be determined by number of cell divisions in some specific tissue.
I wake up 16,000 times every night.
I agree it interesting. I don't think it will be easy to change.
https://www.nature.com/articles/s43587-024-00692-2
Sudden. At age 44 and again at 60. That's why it is interesting. It might be determined by number of cell divisions in some specific tissue.
I wake up 16,000 times every night.
I agree it interesting. I don't think it will be easy to change.
Likes For mschwett:
#12
Randomhead
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Happy Valley, Pennsylvania
Posts: 24,848
Liked 4,032 Times
in
2,744 Posts
The data is interesting, but many of us have been exercising regularly through those ages and I suspect that changes the way things work out.
Things definitely got worse for me when I hit 60, but part of that was by choice. I had elective ankle surgery, and recovering from that has been slow. Not so much because of the ankle, but I got out of shape badly enough that my other problems got worse. Before that, I was working too much in my '30s and '40s, and put on a lot of weight. So that negatively affected my fitness, and I had to work pretty hard to get back into shape. So anything that might have been aging related was masked by the problems I caused myself at the refrigerator.
Things definitely got worse for me when I hit 60, but part of that was by choice. I had elective ankle surgery, and recovering from that has been slow. Not so much because of the ankle, but I got out of shape badly enough that my other problems got worse. Before that, I was working too much in my '30s and '40s, and put on a lot of weight. So that negatively affected my fitness, and I had to work pretty hard to get back into shape. So anything that might have been aging related was masked by the problems I caused myself at the refrigerator.
Likes For unterhausen:
#13
ignominious poltroon
Thread Starter
Interesting. I had non-elective (emergency) ankle surgery at age 50, and it ultimately had exactly the opposite effect (after about 20 years of breeding and blimping).
#14
Me duelen las nalgas
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Texas
Posts: 13,515
Bikes: Centurion Ironman, Trek 5900, Univega Via Carisma, Globe Carmel
Liked 2,814 Times
in
1,808 Posts
Yup, I've experienced phases of rapid decline in fitness, but not at those specific ages. Mine occurred in conjunction with an auto immune disorder in my late 30s, and worsening by my 50s.
My fitness actually improved by age 60, but that's because I worked my butt off to regain fitness after years of being sedentary.
I had another sharp decline in fitness a couple of years ago at age 64, but that was also related to my auto immune disorder worsening after a bout with COVID or some other respiratory virus that took months to clear up. That illness tanked my testosterone level so I started TRT in late 2023. Helped a lot, although it's not a miracle potion -- it didn't magically restore me to my peak fitness of my early 60s. But it's worth checking into if your symptoms and lab results indicate it's an appropriate treatment and your doc approves.
My fitness actually improved by age 60, but that's because I worked my butt off to regain fitness after years of being sedentary.
I had another sharp decline in fitness a couple of years ago at age 64, but that was also related to my auto immune disorder worsening after a bout with COVID or some other respiratory virus that took months to clear up. That illness tanked my testosterone level so I started TRT in late 2023. Helped a lot, although it's not a miracle potion -- it didn't magically restore me to my peak fitness of my early 60s. But it's worth checking into if your symptoms and lab results indicate it's an appropriate treatment and your doc approves.
#15
Happy With My Bikes
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 2,477
Bikes: Hi-Ten bike boomers, a Trek Domane and some projects
Liked 2,752 Times
in
1,279 Posts
You are as old as you feel. Lately I feel the birthdate on my driver's license is wrong.
__________________
"It is the unknown around the corner that turns my wheels." -- Heinz Stücke
"It is the unknown around the corner that turns my wheels." -- Heinz Stücke