Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Fifty Plus (50+) > Pills and Ills
Reload this Page >

Maybe we need a 40+ and a 60+ set of subfora?

Search
Notices
Pills and Ills This is a discussion subforum for the health challenges faced by riders 50+. These discussions are in no way to be considered professional medical advice.

Maybe we need a 40+ and a 60+ set of subfora?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-15-24, 07:22 PM
  #1  
ignominious poltroon
Thread Starter
 
Polaris OBark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2022
Posts: 4,621
Liked 3,936 Times in 2,063 Posts
Maybe we need a 40+ and a 60+ set of subfora?

Nature Aging has a report that has seen a lot of coverage in the popular press. Link.

The claim is that decline with age is not a linear progression, but rather that there are two steep drop-offs, one of which is in your 40s, and the other one in your early 60s.

Polaris OBark is offline  
Old 08-15-24, 10:26 PM
  #2  
ignominious poltroon
Thread Starter
 
Polaris OBark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2022
Posts: 4,621
Liked 3,936 Times in 2,063 Posts
Here is a general audience news report:

https://www.theguardian.com/science/...low-and-steady

Scientists find humans age dramatically in two bursts – at 44, then 60

US findings suggesting ageing is not a slow and steady process could explain spikes in health issues at certain ages
Polaris OBark is offline  
Old 08-16-24, 07:41 AM
  #3  
Sr Member on Sr bikes
 
_ForceD_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Rhode Island (sometimes in SE Florida)
Posts: 2,473

Bikes: Several...from old junk to new all-carbon.

Liked 846 Times in 455 Posts
At 63, and an athlete since my early teens, I will say that approximately those two ages is when I saw the most dramatic changes in athletic performance.

Dan
_ForceD_ is offline  
Old 08-16-24, 07:46 AM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: northern Deep South
Posts: 9,153

Bikes: Fuji Touring, Novara Randonee

Liked 2,156 Times in 1,328 Posts
While I understand the rationale, I suspect splitting one forum broadly read and posted, into two or three would see one or more languishing. See Early brifter for an example that honestly didn't work.
pdlamb is offline  
Likes For pdlamb:
Old 08-16-24, 09:55 AM
  #5  
ignominious poltroon
Thread Starter
 
Polaris OBark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2022
Posts: 4,621
Liked 3,936 Times in 2,063 Posts
Originally Posted by pdlamb
While I understand the rationale, I suspect splitting one forum broadly read and posted, into two or three would see one or more languishing. See Early brifter for an example that honestly didn't work.
It was a rhetorical thread title, not a policy suggestion.
Polaris OBark is offline  
Old 08-16-24, 09:59 AM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: South shore, L.I., NY
Posts: 7,307

Bikes: Flyxii FR322, Cannondale Topstone, Miyata City Liner, Specialized Chisel, Specialized Epic Evo

Liked 2,386 Times in 1,348 Posts
There's a 55+ section. Really wants a +70 or +75 section
Steve B. is online now  
Old 08-16-24, 12:58 PM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2021
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 2,140

Bikes: addict, aethos, creo, vanmoof, sirrus, public ...

Liked 1,482 Times in 755 Posts
Would be really interesting to see the data to understand the specificity of the two ages. Is that an average/median of a wider period in which changes accelerated, or something really specific and sudden. The latter is hard to imagine, given that most things we do vary from person to person in quantity over time - heartbeats, breaths, steps, infections, orgasms, etc. about the only thing which is fixed over time is nights of sleep.

if everyone’s body goes into “decay” mode after waking up 16,000 times, it would be really interesting and potentially easy to change!
mschwett is offline  
Old 08-16-24, 01:04 PM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: northern Deep South
Posts: 9,153

Bikes: Fuji Touring, Novara Randonee

Liked 2,156 Times in 1,328 Posts
Originally Posted by Polaris OBark
It was a rhetorical thread title, not a policy suggestion.
Ah. Maybe I'm mourning for Tommy Smothers, taking things too seriously, and didn't realize it.

(Mom always liked you best!)
pdlamb is offline  
Likes For pdlamb:
Old 08-16-24, 02:25 PM
  #9  
ignominious poltroon
Thread Starter
 
Polaris OBark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2022
Posts: 4,621
Liked 3,936 Times in 2,063 Posts
Originally Posted by mschwett
Would be really interesting to see the data to understand the specificity of the two ages.
That is why I posted the link to the Nature Aging article.

https://www.nature.com/articles/s43587-024-00692-2


​​​​​​ Is that an average/median of a wider period in which changes accelerated, or something really specific and sudden. The latter is hard to imagine, given that most things we do vary from person to person in quantity over time - heartbeats, breaths, steps, infections, orgasms, etc. about the only thing which is fixed over time is nights of sleep.
Sudden. At age 44 and again at 60. That's why it is interesting. It might be determined by number of cell divisions in some specific tissue.

if everyone’s body goes into “decay” mode after waking up 16,000 times, it would be really interesting and potentially easy to change!
I wake up 16,000 times every night.

I agree it interesting. I don't think it will be easy to change.
Polaris OBark is offline  
Old 08-16-24, 02:57 PM
  #10  
Made it to 84 WHOOPIE
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 406
Liked 551 Times in 159 Posts
I'm turning 85 in 2 months, and I'm really being hit right now. Too bad they didn't study beyond age 75.
gobicycling is offline  
Likes For gobicycling:
Old 08-16-24, 02:59 PM
  #11  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2021
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 2,140

Bikes: addict, aethos, creo, vanmoof, sirrus, public ...

Liked 1,482 Times in 755 Posts
Originally Posted by Polaris OBark
That is why I posted the link to the Nature Aging article.

https://www.nature.com/articles/s43587-024-00692-2




Sudden. At age 44 and again at 60. That's why it is interesting. It might be determined by number of cell divisions in some specific tissue.



I wake up 16,000 times every night.

I agree it interesting. I don't think it will be easy to change.
aha. I only followed the second link. There is a ton of data there, interestingly visualized but hard for the layperson to assign significance to. Interesting that within a span of 10ish years, something happens to cause sudden decline in the counts (45ish) but then sudden increase (55ish). It would be interesting if the actual trend is a gradual decline from maturity to death, but there are events in the 40s and 50s which cause a brief and ultimately futile rally….


mschwett is offline  
Likes For mschwett:
Old 08-16-24, 09:29 PM
  #12  
Randomhead
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Happy Valley, Pennsylvania
Posts: 24,848
Liked 4,032 Times in 2,744 Posts
The data is interesting, but many of us have been exercising regularly through those ages and I suspect that changes the way things work out.

Things definitely got worse for me when I hit 60, but part of that was by choice. I had elective ankle surgery, and recovering from that has been slow. Not so much because of the ankle, but I got out of shape badly enough that my other problems got worse. Before that, I was working too much in my '30s and '40s, and put on a lot of weight. So that negatively affected my fitness, and I had to work pretty hard to get back into shape. So anything that might have been aging related was masked by the problems I caused myself at the refrigerator.
unterhausen is offline  
Likes For unterhausen:
Old 08-17-24, 04:07 PM
  #13  
ignominious poltroon
Thread Starter
 
Polaris OBark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2022
Posts: 4,621
Liked 3,936 Times in 2,063 Posts
Interesting. I had non-elective (emergency) ankle surgery at age 50, and it ultimately had exactly the opposite effect (after about 20 years of breeding and blimping).
Polaris OBark is offline  
Old 08-24-24, 01:44 AM
  #14  
Me duelen las nalgas
 
canklecat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Texas
Posts: 13,515

Bikes: Centurion Ironman, Trek 5900, Univega Via Carisma, Globe Carmel

Liked 2,814 Times in 1,808 Posts
Yup, I've experienced phases of rapid decline in fitness, but not at those specific ages. Mine occurred in conjunction with an auto immune disorder in my late 30s, and worsening by my 50s.

My fitness actually improved by age 60, but that's because I worked my butt off to regain fitness after years of being sedentary.

I had another sharp decline in fitness a couple of years ago at age 64, but that was also related to my auto immune disorder worsening after a bout with COVID or some other respiratory virus that took months to clear up. That illness tanked my testosterone level so I started TRT in late 2023. Helped a lot, although it's not a miracle potion -- it didn't magically restore me to my peak fitness of my early 60s. But it's worth checking into if your symptoms and lab results indicate it's an appropriate treatment and your doc approves.
canklecat is offline  
Old 08-24-24, 05:19 AM
  #15  
Happy With My Bikes
 
Chuck M's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 2,477

Bikes: Hi-Ten bike boomers, a Trek Domane and some projects

Liked 2,752 Times in 1,279 Posts
You are as old as you feel. Lately I feel the birthdate on my driver's license is wrong.
__________________
"It is the unknown around the corner that turns my wheels." -- Heinz Stücke

Chuck M is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Your Privacy Choices -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.