Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > General Cycling Discussion
Reload this Page >

Titanium Bikes: Are They Worth it?

Search
Notices
General Cycling Discussion Have a cycling related question or comment that doesn't fit in one of the other specialty forums? Drop on in and post in here! When possible, please select the forum above that most fits your post!
View Poll Results: Your Favorite Bike Frame Material
Aluminum
8.45%
Steel
43.66%
Titanium
28.17%
Carbon
19.72%
Voters: 71. You may not vote on this poll

Titanium Bikes: Are They Worth it?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-15-24, 02:12 PM
  #76  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: In the south but from North
Posts: 745

Bikes: Turner 5-Spot Burner converted; IBIS Ripley, Specialized Crave, Tommasini Sintesi, Cinelli Superstar, Tommasini X-Fire Gravel, Tommasini Mach 5 Gravel

Liked 426 Times in 238 Posts
Originally Posted by cyccommute
No. Stainless steel does rust. At least under the right conditions. Those “right conditions” just happen to be ones that we humans like to make, at least in places where it snows. Salt, or more specifically, the chloride ions in some salts have an affinity for iron and even the chromium in steels. It plucks the iron atoms out of the matrix making them into iron chloride which then rapidly converts to iron oxide while releasing the chloride ions which then go back to pluck out more iron atoms. The cycle continues until the chloride is removed. (A similar mechanism happens with aluminum.) The problem is worse for some grades of stainless.

The reason that titanium tubing even exists is because of this kind of problem. Titanium tubing was developed because of the need to handle chemicals that are corrosive to steel and even 316L stainless (not used in bicycle frames). Titanium is inert to most chemicals, especially under the conditions we cyclist use them for.
Meh. Stainless steel, does not really rust...
vespasianus is offline  
Old 10-15-24, 02:16 PM
  #77  
ignominious poltroon
 
Polaris OBark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2022
Posts: 4,836
Liked 4,206 Times in 2,193 Posts
Originally Posted by vespasianus
Meh. Stainless steel, does not really rust...
Well, that certainly Trumps a chemist's mechanistic analysis.
Polaris OBark is offline  
Likes For Polaris OBark:
Old 10-15-24, 02:20 PM
  #78  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: In the south but from North
Posts: 745

Bikes: Turner 5-Spot Burner converted; IBIS Ripley, Specialized Crave, Tommasini Sintesi, Cinelli Superstar, Tommasini X-Fire Gravel, Tommasini Mach 5 Gravel

Liked 426 Times in 238 Posts
Originally Posted by Polaris OBark
Well, that certainly Trumps a chemist's mechanistic analysis.
Forest through the trees.
vespasianus is offline  
Old 10-15-24, 02:23 PM
  #79  
ignominious poltroon
 
Polaris OBark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2022
Posts: 4,836
Liked 4,206 Times in 2,193 Posts
Start raking.
Polaris OBark is offline  
Likes For Polaris OBark:
Old 10-15-24, 02:24 PM
  #80  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2020
Posts: 617
Liked 102 Times in 74 Posts
Originally Posted by vespasianus
Meh. Stainless steel, does not really rust...
My old bike from 1970s is then not stainless steel but just steel I suppose because its frame is rusted quite a bit. When new, in those days it was a sort of what you would call a training bike for racers or a beginner racer bike, wasn't too expensive. I guess the frame can't be iron but steel, just not a stainless steel.
vane171 is offline  
Old 10-15-24, 02:48 PM
  #81  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: In the south but from North
Posts: 745

Bikes: Turner 5-Spot Burner converted; IBIS Ripley, Specialized Crave, Tommasini Sintesi, Cinelli Superstar, Tommasini X-Fire Gravel, Tommasini Mach 5 Gravel

Liked 426 Times in 238 Posts
Originally Posted by vane171
My old bike from 1970s is then not stainless steel but just steel I suppose because its frame is rusted quite a bit. When new, in those days it was a sort of what you would call a training bike for racers or a beginner racer bike, wasn't too expensive. I guess the frame can't be iron but steel, just not a stainless steel.
Yes, I doubt your bike from 1970 stainless. Bikeforums. Geez.
vespasianus is offline  
Old 10-15-24, 03:02 PM
  #82  
With a mighty wind
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 2,806
Liked 1,061 Times in 601 Posts
On this forum, lots of members think that bike technology peaked at 3x7. I’m not sure how useful their advice about frame material is.
rosefarts is offline  
Old 10-15-24, 04:06 PM
  #83  
Mad bike riding scientist
 
cyccommute's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 27,767

Bikes: Some silver ones, a red one, a black and orange one, and a few titanium ones

Liked 4,614 Times in 2,555 Posts
Originally Posted by vespasianus
Meh. Stainless steel, does not really rust...
Don’t believe me? How about guys who make stainless steel?
__________________
Stuart Black
Plan Epsilon Around Lake Michigan in the era of Covid
Old School…When It Wasn’t Ancient bikepacking
Gold Fever Three days of dirt in Colorado
Pokin' around the Poconos A cold ride around Lake Erie
Dinosaurs in Colorado A mountain bike guide to the Purgatory Canyon dinosaur trackway
Solo Without Pie. The search for pie in the Midwest.
Picking the Scablands. Washington and Oregon, 2005. Pie and spiders on the Columbia River!



cyccommute is offline  
Old 10-15-24, 04:43 PM
  #84  
Clark W. Griswold
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: ,location, location
Posts: 14,850

Bikes: Foundry Chilkoot Ti W/Ultegra Di2, Salsa Timberjack Ti, Cinelli Mash Work RandoCross Fun Time Machine, 1x9 XT Parts Hybrid, Co-Motion Cascadia, Specialized Langster, Phil Wood Apple VeloXS Frame (w/DA 7400), R+M Supercharger2 Rohloff, Habanero Ti 26

Liked 4,661 Times in 3,125 Posts
I guess I missed most of this one but as someone who has 2 titanium bikes and another frame that I need to rebuild into something fun. I have plans for a few other titanium bikes as well. Basically I would happily replace a good portion of my fleet with titanium if I could.

Yes titanium isn't always perfect and certainly won't do everything but it rides nice, is easy to keep clean and looks really good without much care. A frame I don't have to paint is great as I worry about it less. I can give it some abuse and it won't look like crap.
veganbikes is offline  
Old 10-15-24, 06:02 PM
  #85  
Advocatus Diaboli
 
Sy Reene's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Wherever I am
Posts: 8,874

Bikes: Merlin Cyrene, Nashbar steel CX

Liked 1,617 Times in 1,064 Posts
What's the comparative volume of Lynskey, Merlin, Moots recalls vs Trek, Specialized, etc?
Sy Reene is offline  
Old 10-15-24, 06:24 PM
  #86  
Clark W. Griswold
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: ,location, location
Posts: 14,850

Bikes: Foundry Chilkoot Ti W/Ultegra Di2, Salsa Timberjack Ti, Cinelli Mash Work RandoCross Fun Time Machine, 1x9 XT Parts Hybrid, Co-Motion Cascadia, Specialized Langster, Phil Wood Apple VeloXS Frame (w/DA 7400), R+M Supercharger2 Rohloff, Habanero Ti 26

Liked 4,661 Times in 3,125 Posts
Originally Posted by Sy Reene
What's the comparative volume of Lynskey, Merlin, Moots recalls vs Trek, Specialized, etc?
It has got to be pretty low. But I think Moots and Merlin and other similar manufacturers probably have some higher QC at all levels and much smaller production values so they can really keep a better eye on it. I think as well the US ti manufacturers are using less odd ball OEM only stuff as most of their customers aren't interested in saving money for a generic crank with some different affixing bolt.
veganbikes is offline  
Old 10-15-24, 07:03 PM
  #87  
Senior Member
 
Trakhak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 6,316
Liked 3,778 Times in 2,155 Posts
Originally Posted by Sy Reene
What's the comparative volume of Lynskey, Merlin, Moots recalls vs Trek, Specialized, etc?
FWIW, the famous 1997 German Tour magazine article presenting the results of a frame fatigue text they'd commissioned (13 high-end frames built by a variety of manufacturers using various materials) reported that both titanium frames that were tested failed (one at a down tube shifter boss, the other at a down tube bottle cage boss).

All the steel frames that were tested failed before the completion of testing, too. The only frames that survived the test were a Trek carbon frame, a Cannondale aluminum frame, and a Principia aluminum frame.

The testers said that all the steel and titanium frames that failed would likely have survived had they been built with better QC or slightly more conservative design (e.g., slightly thicker tubing at highly stressed locations in the frame).
Trakhak is offline  
Old 10-15-24, 07:20 PM
  #88  
Sunshine
 
mstateglfr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 17,193

Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '88 Schwinn Premis , Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo

Liked 8,236 Times in 4,557 Posts
Originally Posted by veganbikes
It has got to be pretty low. But I think Moots and Merlin and other similar manufacturers probably have some higher QC at all levels and much smaller production values so they can really keep a better eye on it. I think as well the US ti manufacturers are using less odd ball OEM only stuff as most of their customers aren't interested in saving money for a generic crank with some different affixing bolt.
^ recap for those that felt it's tldr - the post is a guess that is based on a guess and a few more guesses thrown in for good measure.
mstateglfr is online now  
Likes For mstateglfr:
Old 10-15-24, 07:49 PM
  #89  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: In the south but from North
Posts: 745

Bikes: Turner 5-Spot Burner converted; IBIS Ripley, Specialized Crave, Tommasini Sintesi, Cinelli Superstar, Tommasini X-Fire Gravel, Tommasini Mach 5 Gravel

Liked 426 Times in 238 Posts
Originally Posted by Trakhak
FWIW, the famous 1997 German Tour magazine article presenting the results of a frame fatigue text they'd commissioned (13 high-end frames built by a variety of manufacturers using various materials) reported that both titanium frames that were tested failed (one at a down tube shifter boss, the other at a down tube bottle cage boss).

All the steel frames that were tested failed before the completion of testing, too. The only frames that survived the test were a Trek carbon frame, a Cannondale aluminum frame, and a Principia aluminum frame.

The testers said that all the steel and titanium frames that failed would likely have survived had they been built with better QC or slightly more conservative design (e.g., slightly thicker tubing at highly stressed locations in the frame).
I have always liked this video:



It shows the difference between materials - at the same diameter - which is why different materials have different diameters when used as a frame material.

vespasianus is offline  
Likes For vespasianus:
Old 10-15-24, 07:54 PM
  #90  
Senior Member
 
rekmeyata's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: NE Indiana
Posts: 8,799

Bikes: 2020 Masi Giramondo 700c; 2013 Lynskey Peloton; 1992 Giant Rincon; 1989 Dawes needs parts; 1985 Trek 660; 1985 Fuji Club; 1984 Schwinn Voyager; 1984 Miyata 612; 1977 Raleigh Competition GS

Liked 304 Times in 244 Posts
Originally Posted by indyfabz
Subaru Forester here. Over 8 years old. Fewer than 30K miles on it. I just find bare Ti boring. I also don’t like most chocolate things. Or were you just trying to get a rise out of people? If so, it didn’t work on me.
Ahh, I'm sorry you didn't get a rise, try Viagra...
rekmeyata is offline  
Old 10-15-24, 09:02 PM
  #91  
Senior Member
 
indyfabz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 40,942
Liked 17,837 Times in 8,345 Posts
Originally Posted by rekmeyata
Ahh, I'm sorry you didn't get a rise, try Viagra...



Have you graduated high school yet?
indyfabz is online now  
Old 10-15-24, 09:50 PM
  #92  
ignominious poltroon
 
Polaris OBark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2022
Posts: 4,836
Liked 4,206 Times in 2,193 Posts
We (my wife's bike) have a raw titanium bike frame. I have a grey Rav4. The car (as well as its color) is boring. It is a car. It is also full of sand and dog hair. Who cares?

The raw Ti bike frame I think has a nice aesthetic. (I would prefer anodized graphics to the decals it has.)

My custom steel bike has a "boring" black finish, with light blue graphics. It is understated, but I like it.

I also like Indy's bike's finish.

They would all be great on a nice bike ride in Oregon:


Polaris OBark is offline  
Likes For Polaris OBark:
Old 10-15-24, 10:14 PM
  #93  
Firm but gentle
 
venturi95's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Oregon
Posts: 619

Bikes: 2005 Litespeed Tuscany, Carver Gnarvester, Soma Pescadero, Pure Cycles Road Disc, Jamis Hybrid

Liked 119 Times in 70 Posts
Originally Posted by rosefarts
On this forum, lots of members think that bike technology peaked at 3x7. I’m not sure how useful their advice about frame material is.
Now you're just quoting out of context. The question was not "when technology peaked". I wonder about your reading comprehension and real-world experience with bicycle drivetrains.
My friends rode from Alaska to Argentina, then around the world through Siberia, all of it on XT 3x7. About 20 years ago we were looking at their long-retired mountain bikes hanging on the wall. "In all that riding I never missed a shift, never..."
You yourself said your Ekar was a disappointment and not precise, but by God it is better than a 3x7!
The only advice I would seek from you is how to smell my own farts.
venturi95 is offline  
Likes For venturi95:
Old 10-16-24, 04:42 AM
  #94  
For The Fun of It
 
Paul Barnard's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Louisissippi Coast
Posts: 5,930

Bikes: Lynskey GR300, Lynskey Backroad, Litespeed T6, Lynskey MT29, Burley Duet

Liked 1,772 Times in 874 Posts
Originally Posted by Juggy_Gales
Did you not like Litespeed or do you just prefer Lynskey?
I built my Lynskeys because they had very good deals on frames. Litespeed rarely has great deals on frames. They are both fantastic in my experience. The Backroad and the GR300 are unequivocally the best bikes I have ever owned.
Paul Barnard is offline  
Old 10-16-24, 06:14 AM
  #95  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2019
Posts: 1,270
Liked 627 Times in 357 Posts
I simply don't think the "upgrade" if it is an upgrade over aluminum is worth the expense. If Aluminum often failed and Titanium never failed the price might be justified. Titanium has just as much or possibly greater potential to fail as aluminum and is unrepairable when it does.
RH Clark is offline  
Likes For RH Clark:
Old 10-16-24, 07:10 AM
  #96  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2023
Posts: 503

Bikes: '00 LS Vortex/Chorus 12/Campag Zondas, '98 LS Classic/Chorus 10/Rolf Vector Pros

Liked 423 Times in 239 Posts
Originally Posted by RH Clark
I simply don't think the "upgrade" if it is an upgrade over aluminum is worth the expense. If Aluminum often failed and Titanium never failed the price might be justified. Titanium has just as much or possibly greater potential to fail as aluminum and is unrepairable when it does.
When did it become “titanium vs aluminum”? All of the major materials have pros and cons - Ti is no different. It’s not the cheapest, but it brings reasonable lightness, a good ride, low maintenance and durability to the table. Can it fail? Sure, like any other material, but I have yet to see any evidence of “greater potential” to fail -whatever that means. Everything has “potential” to fail 🙄 whether or not they actually fail is the issue. Apart from some anecdotes, I have seen no evidence that Ti fails at any higher frequency than any other material. And it is absolutely repairable - it’s likely not cheap and only a few places (eg Ti Cycles) can do it, but it’s doable

Last edited by 13ollocks; 10-16-24 at 07:20 AM.
13ollocks is offline  
Old 10-16-24, 07:25 AM
  #97  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2023
Location: Eastern Shore MD
Posts: 1,277

Bikes: Lemond Zurich/Trek ALR/Giant TCX/Sette CX1

Liked 1,223 Times in 605 Posts
Originally Posted by Paul Barnard
I built my Lynskeys because they had very good deals on frames. Litespeed rarely has great deals on frames. They are both fantastic in my experience. The Backroad and the GR300 are unequivocally the best bikes I have ever owned.
Looking at the Lynskey and the Lightspeed bikes - in the context of the OP's "worth it" over other materials question.

A 105 equipped Lightspeed is almost $2500 more than a 105 equipped good aluminum bike. Worth it? I don't know.

The 105 Lynskey is on sale and is only$1200 more than a 105 aluminum bike - and the Lynskey has decent wheels in the base spec. Worth it? HMMMMMM, that bike has me thinking.
Jughed is offline  
Old 10-16-24, 07:32 AM
  #98  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2019
Posts: 1,270
Liked 627 Times in 357 Posts
Originally Posted by 13ollocks
When did it become “titanium vs aluminum”? All of the major materials have pros and cons - Ti is no different. It’s not the cheapest, but it brings reasonable lightness, a good ride, low maintenance and durability to the table. Can it fail? Sure, like any other material, but I have yet to see any evidence of “greater potential” to fail -whatever that means. Everything has “potential” to fail 🙄 whether or not they actually fail is the issue. Apart from some anecdotes, I have seen no evidence that Ti fails at any higher frequency than any other material. And it is absolutely repairable - it’s likely not cheap and only a few places (eg Ti Cycles) can do it, but it’s doable
I don't mind if anyone prefers titanium. I simply stated why I wouldn't pick it. What I mean by "greater potential" to fail is that titanium being harder to properly weld ads a complication factor that often contributes to failure. At least that's the excuse I've heard when less expensive titanium failed.

I am not arguing that titanium has any greater failure rate than any other material, but I don't think it can be argued that it has less either. I've ridden titanium and I can't tell much difference between it any other material,so for my use it's just not worth the extra expense. YMMV
RH Clark is offline  
Old 10-16-24, 07:43 AM
  #99  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2023
Location: Eastern Shore MD
Posts: 1,277

Bikes: Lemond Zurich/Trek ALR/Giant TCX/Sette CX1

Liked 1,223 Times in 605 Posts
Originally Posted by 13ollocks
When did it become “titanium vs aluminum”?
The OP asked if TI is worth it and had a poll about what the group prefers. So, all materials are on the table.

Ti vs Alu - purely in the "worth it" context. (leaving out the "want it" argument, or the what will assplode first argument)

You can get 2 decent Alu bikes, similarly equipped, for the price of one Ti bike. Same group set, same quality wheels +/-, similar weight, ride characteristics will be fairly similar, durability will be fairly similar - is the Ti bike worth it?

I say no. But that's my opinion about just the "worth it" argument.
Jughed is offline  
Old 10-16-24, 08:06 AM
  #100  
Senior Member
 
Trakhak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 6,316
Liked 3,778 Times in 2,155 Posts
Originally Posted by venturi95
The only advice I would seek from you is how to smell my own farts.
Wittgenstein? Or John Stuart Mill?
Trakhak is offline  
Likes For Trakhak:


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.