Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Classic & Vintage
Reload this Page >

Anyone ride a bigger bike than normal?

Search
Notices
Classic & Vintage This forum is to discuss the many aspects of classic and vintage bicycles, including musclebikes, lightweights, middleweights, hi-wheelers, bone-shakers, safety bikes and much more.

Anyone ride a bigger bike than normal?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-17-24, 12:56 PM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Elwood Indiana
Posts: 7,672

Bikes: they change so much I'm tired of updating this

Liked 1,575 Times in 545 Posts
Anyone ride a bigger bike than normal?

Reason I ask is I just finished with this Colnago Super to sell for a friend. It’s a 59cm frame c-t and it feels pretty comfortable. I’m 5’9” and 56 is usually my max when buying. I was a little confused after riding it and double checked my measuring. Anyone else run into this?
__________________
Semper fi
sloar is offline  
Likes For sloar:
Old 10-17-24, 12:58 PM
  #2  
ignominious poltroon
 
Polaris OBark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2022
Posts: 4,797
Liked 4,111 Times in 2,149 Posts
I'm your height, but my legs have 30" inseam. Just looking at the head tube, I can tell you I would never be able to ride that bike.

I am guessing your legs might be longer. Older bikes had shorter reach.
Polaris OBark is offline  
Old 10-17-24, 01:00 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Elwood Indiana
Posts: 7,672

Bikes: they change so much I'm tired of updating this

Liked 1,575 Times in 545 Posts
Originally Posted by Polaris OBark
I'm your height, but my legs have 30" inseam. Just looking at the head tube, I can tell you I would never be able to ride that bike.

I am guessing your legs might be longer. Older bikes had shorter reach.

I have the same inseam, I did lower the seat a little bit after the pic was taken but not much.
__________________
Semper fi
sloar is offline  
Old 10-17-24, 01:00 PM
  #4  
Edumacator
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Goose Creek, SC
Posts: 7,662

Bikes: '87 Crestdale, '87 Basso Gap, '92 Rossin Performance EL-OS, 1990 VanTuyl, 1980s Losa, 1985 Trek 670, 1982 AD SLE, 1987 PX10, etc...

Liked 3,660 Times in 2,294 Posts
Originally Posted by sloar
Reason I ask is I just finished with this Colnago Super to sell for a friend. It’s a 59cm frame c-t and it feels pretty comfortable. I’m 5’9” and 56 is usually my max when buying. I was a little confused after riding it and double checked my measuring. Anyone else run into this?
Yes. And the reverse. I think it all is a secret sauce type of thing. And really, the way seatposts can be so flexible, perhaps riding a larger size lets you get some relief on the stem height. Merziac can weigh in since he rides a much larger size than you'd expect at his height (or at least I did).
__________________
1987 Crest Cannondale, 1987 Basso Gap, 1992 Rossin Performance EL, 1990ish Van Tuyl, 1985 Trek 670, 2003 Pinarello Surprise, 1990ish MBK Atlantique, 1987 Peugeot Competition, 1987 Nishiki Tri-A, 1981 Faggin, 1996 Cannondale M500, 1984 Mercian, 1982 AD SuperLeicht, 1985 Massi (model unknown), 1988 Daccordi Griffe , 1989 Fauxsin MTB, 1981 Ciocc Mockba, 1992 Bianchi Giro, 1977 Colnago Super, 1971 Raleigh International, 1998 Corratec Ap & Dun, 1991 Peugeot Slimestone














Last edited by jdawginsc; 10-17-24 at 01:51 PM.
jdawginsc is offline  
Likes For jdawginsc:
Old 10-17-24, 01:18 PM
  #5  
Passista
 
Reynolds's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 7,843

Bikes: 1998 Pinarello Asolo, 1992 KHS Montaña pro, 1980 Raleigh DL-1, IGH Hybrid, IGH Utility

Liked 866 Times in 483 Posts
Yes, but not by much. My 'normal' size would be a 53, but my most comfortable bike is a 55.
Reynolds is offline  
Old 10-17-24, 01:22 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
ascherer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Manhattan & Woodstock NY
Posts: 2,975

Bikes: 2024 A Homer Hilsen, 1987 Mercian Pro, 1985 Shogun 500, early '70s Falcon San Remo, 1972 Peugeot PX-10, 1972 Schwinn Paramount P13-9, 1971 Raleigh International, 1971 Peugeot PX-10, 1970 Raleigh Professional Mk1

Liked 3,705 Times in 1,126 Posts
I'm in that camp. 6' 3", 34+ inseam, 95 PBH. I rode 62cm frames for decades. Then I got some larger ones and found that I liked the feel & fit better.
__________________
2024 A Homer Hilsen, 1987 Mercian Pro, 1985 Shogun 500, 197? Falcon San Remo, 1972 Peugeot PX-10, 1972 Schwinn Paramount P13-9, 1971 Peugeot PX-10, 1971 Raleigh International, 1970 Raleigh Professional Mark I
Curator/Team Mechanic: 2016 Dawes Streetfighter, 1984 Lotus Eclair, 1975 Motobecane Jubile Mixte, 1974 Raleigh Sports, 1973 Free Spirit Ted Williams, 1972 Raleigh Super Course, 1971 Philips Sport






ascherer is offline  
Likes For ascherer:
Old 10-17-24, 01:22 PM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 17,609
Liked 7,915 Times in 2,919 Posts
This is one reason why I find stack and reach are better measurements to use for fitting than length of tubes:

https://road.cc/content/feature/what...portant-266968
nlerner is offline  
Likes For nlerner:
Old 10-17-24, 01:36 PM
  #8  
señor miembro
 
SurferRosa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Pac NW
Posts: 6,675

Bikes: '70s - '80s Campagnolo

Liked 7,157 Times in 3,508 Posts
I only rode 56-57 until I found this '91 Bottecchia, stamped 59.



Its comfort made me realize I needed taller, longer frames under me to absorb more of the road for aging bones. I'm just tall enough -- the aero part of the seatpost barely clears the frame.
SurferRosa is offline  
Likes For SurferRosa:
Old 10-17-24, 01:44 PM
  #9  
Newbie
 
Join Date: Sep 2024
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by ascherer
I'm in that camp. 6' 3", 34+ inseam, 95 PBH. I rode 62cm frames for decades. Then I got some larger ones and found that I liked the feel & fit better.
Im wondering if I should do this myself. I have a 63cm. I’m 6’4 with a 34 inch inseam. The leg room is fine but my upper body is a little cramped. There’s a 65cm trek up the road from me. Hmmm
Loganiscool is offline  
Likes For Loganiscool:
Old 10-17-24, 01:57 PM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Madison, WI USA
Posts: 6,174
Liked 1,768 Times in 1,199 Posts
I'm 5'8" with a 33" inseam. Looking at the subject bike, I'd fit it fine vertically, but I'd be waaaay stretched over the top tube.
madpogue is offline  
Old 10-17-24, 02:15 PM
  #11  
Senior Member
 
merziac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: PDX
Posts: 13,587

Bikes: Merz x 5 + Specialized Merz Allez x 2, Strawberry/Newlands/DiNucci/Ti x3, Gordon, Fuso/Moulton x2, Bornstein, Paisley,1958-74 Paramounts x3, 3rensho, 74 Moto TC, 73-78 Raleigh Pro's x5, Marinoni x2, 1960 Cinelli SC, 1980 Bianchi SC, PX-10 X 2

Liked 6,881 Times in 3,926 Posts
Originally Posted by sloar
Reason I ask is I just finished with this Colnago Super to sell for a friend. It’s a 59cm frame c-t and it feels pretty comfortable. I’m 5’9” and 56 is usually my max when buying. I was a little confused after riding it and double checked my measuring. Anyone else run into this?
Yep, I'm only 6' 0" but have a 38in inseam and can ride some 60cm up to 66cm, my custom Strawberry is about 64.5 and was made to still fit when I get older and shrink, become more decrepit, etc.

The big silver Merz was the aha bike at 66, got it all dialed in, rode it awhile then "oh crap, I have to quit buying 58, 60, 62 unless something really special. "

Then bought a 26.5in Paramount to verify and sure enough both bikes rode far better than any of my other jacked up abominations.

The Strawberry was built and fitted from the big Merz and a should be too small BG that is about 61cm but rides fantastic under me for the geometry, Koolaid or whatever.

This brings up the key thing for me that Dave Levy at TiCycles brought it all together building the Strawberry, it rides better than any other by quite a bit which I would have thought impossible since the big Merz and Paramount rode so much better than the rest for being right sized.

It was imperative to me to have builder do the fitting as they are literally "joined at the hip" in my mind and it was a great experience well worth the POA.

I know most of us here have/had a lot of bikes and are pretty good at this but encourage anyone with an urge and the means to build a custom frame especially if you have a local builder that does the fitting and is proactive in the process as I think they should be.






Last edited by merziac; 10-17-24 at 02:23 PM.
merziac is offline  
Likes For merziac:
Old 10-17-24, 02:19 PM
  #12  
Senior Member
 
Mr. 66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 3,554
Liked 2,015 Times in 1,079 Posts
I have a few that are large for me, most have worked out very well. Like the Nishiki
Haven’t had the chance to really launch on this Viner. My first impression is the cockpit may be long for my ergonomic.

Difficult to say on the Viner, my test ride was cut short from debris and goathead thorn. Frosted my cookies.

The Serotta, even set as it is I’m just a hanging in full ape.

It has a toptube of 61cm plus.
Mr. 66 is online now  
Old 10-17-24, 02:25 PM
  #13  
Senior Member
 
merziac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: PDX
Posts: 13,587

Bikes: Merz x 5 + Specialized Merz Allez x 2, Strawberry/Newlands/DiNucci/Ti x3, Gordon, Fuso/Moulton x2, Bornstein, Paisley,1958-74 Paramounts x3, 3rensho, 74 Moto TC, 73-78 Raleigh Pro's x5, Marinoni x2, 1960 Cinelli SC, 1980 Bianchi SC, PX-10 X 2

Liked 6,881 Times in 3,926 Posts
Originally Posted by Loganiscool
Im wondering if I should do this myself. I have a 63cm. I’m 6’4 with a 34 inch inseam. The leg room is fine but my upper body is a little cramped. There’s a 65cm trek up the road from me. Hmmm
Get to it, make it so.
merziac is offline  
Old 10-17-24, 02:30 PM
  #14  
Senior Member
 
merziac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: PDX
Posts: 13,587

Bikes: Merz x 5 + Specialized Merz Allez x 2, Strawberry/Newlands/DiNucci/Ti x3, Gordon, Fuso/Moulton x2, Bornstein, Paisley,1958-74 Paramounts x3, 3rensho, 74 Moto TC, 73-78 Raleigh Pro's x5, Marinoni x2, 1960 Cinelli SC, 1980 Bianchi SC, PX-10 X 2

Liked 6,881 Times in 3,926 Posts
Originally Posted by sloar
Reason I ask is I just finished with this Colnago Super to sell for a friend. It’s a 59cm frame c-t and it feels pretty comfortable. I’m 5’9” and 56 is usually my max when buying. I was a little confused after riding it and double checked my measuring. Anyone else run into this?
Yes, see long winded post above.

If you can ride this you need to sell it to yourself.
merziac is offline  
Likes For merziac:
Old 10-17-24, 02:55 PM
  #15  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 3,653
Liked 2,523 Times in 1,394 Posts
I am 6' plus a little bit , my inseam is 35" . Therefore I usually ride a 63cm bike. My Colnago Super is 62 and fits like a glove! I sold my 60cm bikes that were too small and one 63cm bike only because the top tube was longer than I like. Agree with merziac KEEP IT!!! Italian goodness.

1975 Super
Kabuki12 is offline  
Likes For Kabuki12:
Old 10-17-24, 05:13 PM
  #16  
Senior Member
 
steelbikeguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Peoria, IL
Posts: 4,669
Liked 3,673 Times in 1,698 Posts
It's not bad to try out different sized bikes to see what you might like. Ideally, you just borrow a buddy's bike for a ride.
My nominal ideal size is the 24 1/2" c-t Raleigh from the 70's. I first rode this when I bought my '76 Raleigh Gran Sport brand new! Rode it for about 14 years, and then had a custom bike built with roughly similar dimensions.
I was able to pick up a nice shiny '74 Raleigh International about 24 years ago in the same 24 1/2" size, and I still think that it fits very nicely. You can see that the seat post and stem are somewhere about the middle of their range.



Not too long afterwards, I was able to pick up a 60cm c-t Raleigh Team frame. It's a bit small, but the top tube is about the same as the International. The seat looks kinda high, and the stem is at its max height. This does force me into a more aero position, which isn't really a problem, and does help me be a bit faster on a bike that was supposed to be ridden fast!



The last British bike that I've bought is a somewhat large Hetchins. It's about 25" c-t, but seems larger due to the higher bottom bracket, which is between 10 3/4" and 11". The seat is fairly low, and the stem is near the bottom of its range. The top tube is similar to the other bikes, and the bike is comfortable. It is a bit more difficult to get low and aero, though.



It's helpful to compare the length of the head tubes, as it seems to be a easily visible measure of how the seat tube fits me.


Steve in Peoria
steelbikeguy is offline  
Likes For steelbikeguy:
Old 10-17-24, 06:00 PM
  #17  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Portland, Cascadia
Posts: 566
Liked 314 Times in 135 Posts
I rode many 60-57cm frames despite being 6'3" with 34"+ inseam.

Found a 25.5" Trek 910 for a screamin' deal and thought "damn, that's gonna be too large."

Once I mounted it though, I knew I had to sell everything else.

Haven't ridden any larger frames than that, but it really sealed the deal for me.
​​​​​​
​​​​The other shame is I'm a noodle of a person and don't need as stout a tubeset as other people my height. Columbus SP is overkill for me; currently scouring for a 710 (or 720!) in my size.
​​​​
jPrichard10 is offline  
Old 10-17-24, 06:25 PM
  #18  
Newbie
 
Join Date: Sep 2024
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by jPrichard10
I rode many 60-57cm frames despite being 6'3" with 34"+ inseam.

Found a 25.5" Trek 910 for a screamin' deal and thought "damn, that's gonna be too large."

Once I mounted it though, I knew I had to sell everything else.

Haven't ridden any larger frames than that, but it really sealed the deal for me.
​​​​​​
​​​​The other shame is I'm a noodle of a person and don't need as stout a tubeset as other people my height. Columbus SP is overkill for me; currently scouring for a 710 (or 720!) in my size.
​​​​
I have the same inseam and I’m 6’4. There is a 730 25.5 up the road from me. The only problem is someone replaced the 700c rear wheel with a 27” 😕 My regular 24.5 frame needs more top tube. This might be what I needed to just buy it lol.
Loganiscool is offline  
Old 10-17-24, 06:44 PM
  #19  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2021
Location: Beaverton, OR
Posts: 1,631

Bikes: You had me at rusty and Italian!!

Liked 1,200 Times in 628 Posts
I’m 5’9 3/4” with a 30” inseam and believed stuff I read that said a 54cm bike was my size. I always felt cramped but thought I just needed to tweak a few settings for proper fit. I hopped on a 56cm bike and all I could think was “This is what I should be riding!” The seat and bars sit a bit low but the rest is fabulous.
merziac were discussing stuff and I saw the light that stand over is BS. Traditional thought says if you are on the border between sizes get the smaller. That doesn’t work for me but that’s why there are a bazillion kinds of beer.
RustyJames is offline  
Likes For RustyJames:
Old 10-17-24, 06:45 PM
  #20  
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2022
Location: Australia
Posts: 167
Liked 81 Times in 56 Posts
Originally Posted by SurferRosa
I only rode 56-57 until I found this '91 Bottecchia, stamped 59.



Its comfort made me realize I needed taller, longer frames under me to absorb more of the road for aging bones. I'm just tall enough -- the aero part of the seatpost barely clears the frame.
I don't say this about many bikes, but that is beautiful !
redshift1 is offline  
Old 10-17-24, 06:50 PM
  #21  
Senior Member
 
steelbikeguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Peoria, IL
Posts: 4,669
Liked 3,673 Times in 1,698 Posts
Originally Posted by jPrichard10
......
​​​​The other shame is I'm a noodle of a person and don't need as stout a tubeset as other people my height. Columbus SP is overkill for me; currently scouring for a 710 (or 720!) in my size.
​​​​
I'm 6' tall and 155 pounds, and I've realized that the frames that fit me were built for people who weighed a bit more. When I picked up a Raleigh Team made of Reynolds 753, I realized that I was happier with a more flexible frame. This extra requirement does make it harder to find the right frame, but it can be worthwhile.

Steve in Peoria
steelbikeguy is offline  
Old 10-17-24, 07:09 PM
  #22  
Senior Member
 
daverup's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2019
Location: Michigan USA
Posts: 1,064

Bikes: A bunch of old bikes.

Liked 1,098 Times in 500 Posts
I usually ride a 58cm, but I do have one a bit larger. My 82 Araya Road 821 is a 25", but it is measured CTT. It is comfortable with the seat low since the top tube is only 22" CTC.


daverup is offline  
Likes For daverup:
Old 10-17-24, 07:28 PM
  #23  
Henderson, NV
 
Desert Ryder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2022
Location: Henderson/Las Vegas NV
Posts: 691

Bikes: Trek Alpha 3700, GT STS DH, Raleigh Grand Prix, Fisher Montare, Fisher CR-7, Fisher Aquila, Diamondback Sorrento, The Bike Beat Revolution, KHS XC 504R

Liked 790 Times in 384 Posts
I'm 6' with a 32" inseam. I ride a Raleigh Grand Prix that is slightly too large but I'm comfortable riding it. The seat is bottomed out but at least it isn't stuck. I do have to stand on my toes to straddle it and the top tube does contact the jewels.I've gotten used to leaning to one side when straddling the bike. I ride flat pedals with no clips.
A quick measurment (+- 1/8"); Top tube 22.5" ,seat tube is 25.5" , head tube 8.5"


Desert Ryder is offline  
Old 10-17-24, 08:34 PM
  #24  
Senior Member
 
merziac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: PDX
Posts: 13,587

Bikes: Merz x 5 + Specialized Merz Allez x 2, Strawberry/Newlands/DiNucci/Ti x3, Gordon, Fuso/Moulton x2, Bornstein, Paisley,1958-74 Paramounts x3, 3rensho, 74 Moto TC, 73-78 Raleigh Pro's x5, Marinoni x2, 1960 Cinelli SC, 1980 Bianchi SC, PX-10 X 2

Liked 6,881 Times in 3,926 Posts
Originally Posted by jPrichard10
I rode many 60-57cm frames despite being 6'3" with 34"+ inseam.

Found a 25.5" Trek 910 for a screamin' deal and thought "damn, that's gonna be too large."

Once I mounted it though, I knew I had to sell everything else.

Haven't ridden any larger frames than that, but it really sealed the deal for me.
​​​​​​
​​​​The other shame is I'm a noodle of a person and don't need as stout a tubeset as other people my height. Columbus SP is overkill for me; currently scouring for a 710 (or 720!) in my size.
​​​​
Dave wanted to use an oversize DT AND TT on the Strawberry, we had discussed it already, "no Dave, you said it would be ok, skinny tubes only", "It's gonna be noodley" he says, "exactly", I said.
merziac is offline  
Likes For merziac:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Your Privacy Choices -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.