Anyone ride a bigger bike than normal?
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Anyone ride a bigger bike than normal?
Reason I ask is I just finished with this Colnago Super to sell for a friend. It’s a 59cm frame c-t and it feels pretty comfortable. I’m 5’9” and 56 is usually my max when buying. I was a little confused after riding it and double checked my measuring. Anyone else run into this?
__________________
Semper fi
Semper fi
Likes For sloar:
#2
I'm your height, but my legs have 30" inseam. Just looking at the head tube, I can tell you I would never be able to ride that bike.
I am guessing your legs might be longer. Older bikes had shorter reach.
I am guessing your legs might be longer. Older bikes had shorter reach.
#3
Senior Member
Thread Starter
I have the same inseam, I did lower the seat a little bit after the pic was taken but not much.
__________________
Semper fi
Semper fi
#4
Edumacator
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Goose Creek, SC
Posts: 7,662
Bikes: '87 Crestdale, '87 Basso Gap, '92 Rossin Performance EL-OS, 1990 VanTuyl, 1980s Losa, 1985 Trek 670, 1982 AD SLE, 1987 PX10, etc...
Liked 3,660 Times
in
2,294 Posts
Reason I ask is I just finished with this Colnago Super to sell for a friend. It’s a 59cm frame c-t and it feels pretty comfortable. I’m 5’9” and 56 is usually my max when buying. I was a little confused after riding it and double checked my measuring. Anyone else run into this?
__________________
1987 Crest Cannondale, 1987 Basso Gap, 1992 Rossin Performance EL, 1990ish Van Tuyl, 1985 Trek 670, 2003 Pinarello Surprise, 1990ish MBK Atlantique, 1987 Peugeot Competition, 1987 Nishiki Tri-A, 1981 Faggin, 1996 Cannondale M500, 1984 Mercian, 1982 AD SuperLeicht, 1985 Massi (model unknown), 1988 Daccordi Griffe , 1989 Fauxsin MTB, 1981 Ciocc Mockba, 1992 Bianchi Giro, 1977 Colnago Super, 1971 Raleigh International, 1998 Corratec Ap & Dun, 1991 Peugeot Slimestone
1987 Crest Cannondale, 1987 Basso Gap, 1992 Rossin Performance EL, 1990ish Van Tuyl, 1985 Trek 670, 2003 Pinarello Surprise, 1990ish MBK Atlantique, 1987 Peugeot Competition, 1987 Nishiki Tri-A, 1981 Faggin, 1996 Cannondale M500, 1984 Mercian, 1982 AD SuperLeicht, 1985 Massi (model unknown), 1988 Daccordi Griffe , 1989 Fauxsin MTB, 1981 Ciocc Mockba, 1992 Bianchi Giro, 1977 Colnago Super, 1971 Raleigh International, 1998 Corratec Ap & Dun, 1991 Peugeot Slimestone
Last edited by jdawginsc; 10-17-24 at 01:51 PM.
Likes For jdawginsc:
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Manhattan & Woodstock NY
Posts: 2,975
Bikes: 2024 A Homer Hilsen, 1987 Mercian Pro, 1985 Shogun 500, early '70s Falcon San Remo, 1972 Peugeot PX-10, 1972 Schwinn Paramount P13-9, 1971 Raleigh International, 1971 Peugeot PX-10, 1970 Raleigh Professional Mk1
Liked 3,705 Times
in
1,126 Posts
I'm in that camp. 6' 3", 34+ inseam, 95 PBH. I rode 62cm frames for decades. Then I got some larger ones and found that I liked the feel & fit better.
__________________
2024 A Homer Hilsen, 1987 Mercian Pro, 1985 Shogun 500, 197? Falcon San Remo, 1972 Peugeot PX-10, 1972 Schwinn Paramount P13-9, 1971 Peugeot PX-10, 1971 Raleigh International, 1970 Raleigh Professional Mark I
Curator/Team Mechanic: 2016 Dawes Streetfighter, 1984 Lotus Eclair, 1975 Motobecane Jubile Mixte, 1974 Raleigh Sports, 1973 Free Spirit Ted Williams, 1972 Raleigh Super Course, 1971 Philips Sport
2024 A Homer Hilsen, 1987 Mercian Pro, 1985 Shogun 500, 197? Falcon San Remo, 1972 Peugeot PX-10, 1972 Schwinn Paramount P13-9, 1971 Peugeot PX-10, 1971 Raleigh International, 1970 Raleigh Professional Mark I
Curator/Team Mechanic: 2016 Dawes Streetfighter, 1984 Lotus Eclair, 1975 Motobecane Jubile Mixte, 1974 Raleigh Sports, 1973 Free Spirit Ted Williams, 1972 Raleigh Super Course, 1971 Philips Sport
Likes For ascherer:
#7
Senior Member
This is one reason why I find stack and reach are better measurements to use for fitting than length of tubes:
https://road.cc/content/feature/what...portant-266968
https://road.cc/content/feature/what...portant-266968
#8
señor miembro
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Pac NW
Posts: 6,675
Bikes: '70s - '80s Campagnolo
Liked 7,157 Times
in
3,508 Posts
I only rode 56-57 until I found this '91 Bottecchia, stamped 59.
Its comfort made me realize I needed taller, longer frames under me to absorb more of the road for aging bones. I'm just tall enough -- the aero part of the seatpost barely clears the frame.
Its comfort made me realize I needed taller, longer frames under me to absorb more of the road for aging bones. I'm just tall enough -- the aero part of the seatpost barely clears the frame.
Likes For SurferRosa:
#9
Newbie
Likes For Loganiscool:
#10
Senior Member
I'm 5'8" with a 33" inseam. Looking at the subject bike, I'd fit it fine vertically, but I'd be waaaay stretched over the top tube.
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: PDX
Posts: 13,587
Bikes: Merz x 5 + Specialized Merz Allez x 2, Strawberry/Newlands/DiNucci/Ti x3, Gordon, Fuso/Moulton x2, Bornstein, Paisley,1958-74 Paramounts x3, 3rensho, 74 Moto TC, 73-78 Raleigh Pro's x5, Marinoni x2, 1960 Cinelli SC, 1980 Bianchi SC, PX-10 X 2
Liked 6,881 Times
in
3,926 Posts
Reason I ask is I just finished with this Colnago Super to sell for a friend. It’s a 59cm frame c-t and it feels pretty comfortable. I’m 5’9” and 56 is usually my max when buying. I was a little confused after riding it and double checked my measuring. Anyone else run into this?
The big silver Merz was the aha bike at 66, got it all dialed in, rode it awhile then "oh crap, I have to quit buying 58, 60, 62 unless something really special. "
Then bought a 26.5in Paramount to verify and sure enough both bikes rode far better than any of my other jacked up abominations.
The Strawberry was built and fitted from the big Merz and a should be too small BG that is about 61cm but rides fantastic under me for the geometry, Koolaid or whatever.
This brings up the key thing for me that Dave Levy at TiCycles brought it all together building the Strawberry, it rides better than any other by quite a bit which I would have thought impossible since the big Merz and Paramount rode so much better than the rest for being right sized.
It was imperative to me to have builder do the fitting as they are literally "joined at the hip" in my mind and it was a great experience well worth the POA.
I know most of us here have/had a lot of bikes and are pretty good at this but encourage anyone with an urge and the means to build a custom frame especially if you have a local builder that does the fitting and is proactive in the process as I think they should be.
Last edited by merziac; 10-17-24 at 02:23 PM.
Likes For merziac:
#12
I have a few that are large for me, most have worked out very well. Like the Nishiki
Haven’t had the chance to really launch on this Viner. My first impression is the cockpit may be long for my ergonomic.
Difficult to say on the Viner, my test ride was cut short from debris and goathead thorn. Frosted my cookies.
The Serotta, even set as it is I’m just a hanging in full ape.
It has a toptube of 61cm plus.
Haven’t had the chance to really launch on this Viner. My first impression is the cockpit may be long for my ergonomic.
Difficult to say on the Viner, my test ride was cut short from debris and goathead thorn. Frosted my cookies.
The Serotta, even set as it is I’m just a hanging in full ape.
It has a toptube of 61cm plus.
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: PDX
Posts: 13,587
Bikes: Merz x 5 + Specialized Merz Allez x 2, Strawberry/Newlands/DiNucci/Ti x3, Gordon, Fuso/Moulton x2, Bornstein, Paisley,1958-74 Paramounts x3, 3rensho, 74 Moto TC, 73-78 Raleigh Pro's x5, Marinoni x2, 1960 Cinelli SC, 1980 Bianchi SC, PX-10 X 2
Liked 6,881 Times
in
3,926 Posts
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: PDX
Posts: 13,587
Bikes: Merz x 5 + Specialized Merz Allez x 2, Strawberry/Newlands/DiNucci/Ti x3, Gordon, Fuso/Moulton x2, Bornstein, Paisley,1958-74 Paramounts x3, 3rensho, 74 Moto TC, 73-78 Raleigh Pro's x5, Marinoni x2, 1960 Cinelli SC, 1980 Bianchi SC, PX-10 X 2
Liked 6,881 Times
in
3,926 Posts
Reason I ask is I just finished with this Colnago Super to sell for a friend. It’s a 59cm frame c-t and it feels pretty comfortable. I’m 5’9” and 56 is usually my max when buying. I was a little confused after riding it and double checked my measuring. Anyone else run into this?
If you can ride this you need to sell it to yourself.
#15
Senior Member
I am 6' plus a little bit , my inseam is 35" . Therefore I usually ride a 63cm bike. My Colnago Super is 62 and fits like a glove! I sold my 60cm bikes that were too small and one 63cm bike only because the top tube was longer than I like. Agree with merziac KEEP IT!!! Italian goodness.
1975 Super
1975 Super
Likes For Kabuki12:
#16
Senior Member
It's not bad to try out different sized bikes to see what you might like. Ideally, you just borrow a buddy's bike for a ride.
My nominal ideal size is the 24 1/2" c-t Raleigh from the 70's. I first rode this when I bought my '76 Raleigh Gran Sport brand new! Rode it for about 14 years, and then had a custom bike built with roughly similar dimensions.
I was able to pick up a nice shiny '74 Raleigh International about 24 years ago in the same 24 1/2" size, and I still think that it fits very nicely. You can see that the seat post and stem are somewhere about the middle of their range.
Not too long afterwards, I was able to pick up a 60cm c-t Raleigh Team frame. It's a bit small, but the top tube is about the same as the International. The seat looks kinda high, and the stem is at its max height. This does force me into a more aero position, which isn't really a problem, and does help me be a bit faster on a bike that was supposed to be ridden fast!
The last British bike that I've bought is a somewhat large Hetchins. It's about 25" c-t, but seems larger due to the higher bottom bracket, which is between 10 3/4" and 11". The seat is fairly low, and the stem is near the bottom of its range. The top tube is similar to the other bikes, and the bike is comfortable. It is a bit more difficult to get low and aero, though.
It's helpful to compare the length of the head tubes, as it seems to be a easily visible measure of how the seat tube fits me.
Steve in Peoria
My nominal ideal size is the 24 1/2" c-t Raleigh from the 70's. I first rode this when I bought my '76 Raleigh Gran Sport brand new! Rode it for about 14 years, and then had a custom bike built with roughly similar dimensions.
I was able to pick up a nice shiny '74 Raleigh International about 24 years ago in the same 24 1/2" size, and I still think that it fits very nicely. You can see that the seat post and stem are somewhere about the middle of their range.
Not too long afterwards, I was able to pick up a 60cm c-t Raleigh Team frame. It's a bit small, but the top tube is about the same as the International. The seat looks kinda high, and the stem is at its max height. This does force me into a more aero position, which isn't really a problem, and does help me be a bit faster on a bike that was supposed to be ridden fast!
The last British bike that I've bought is a somewhat large Hetchins. It's about 25" c-t, but seems larger due to the higher bottom bracket, which is between 10 3/4" and 11". The seat is fairly low, and the stem is near the bottom of its range. The top tube is similar to the other bikes, and the bike is comfortable. It is a bit more difficult to get low and aero, though.
It's helpful to compare the length of the head tubes, as it seems to be a easily visible measure of how the seat tube fits me.
Steve in Peoria
Likes For steelbikeguy:
#17
Senior Member
I rode many 60-57cm frames despite being 6'3" with 34"+ inseam.
Found a 25.5" Trek 910 for a screamin' deal and thought "damn, that's gonna be too large."
Once I mounted it though, I knew I had to sell everything else.
Haven't ridden any larger frames than that, but it really sealed the deal for me.
The other shame is I'm a noodle of a person and don't need as stout a tubeset as other people my height. Columbus SP is overkill for me; currently scouring for a 710 (or 720!) in my size.
Found a 25.5" Trek 910 for a screamin' deal and thought "damn, that's gonna be too large."
Once I mounted it though, I knew I had to sell everything else.
Haven't ridden any larger frames than that, but it really sealed the deal for me.
The other shame is I'm a noodle of a person and don't need as stout a tubeset as other people my height. Columbus SP is overkill for me; currently scouring for a 710 (or 720!) in my size.
#18
Newbie
I rode many 60-57cm frames despite being 6'3" with 34"+ inseam.
Found a 25.5" Trek 910 for a screamin' deal and thought "damn, that's gonna be too large."
Once I mounted it though, I knew I had to sell everything else.
Haven't ridden any larger frames than that, but it really sealed the deal for me.
The other shame is I'm a noodle of a person and don't need as stout a tubeset as other people my height. Columbus SP is overkill for me; currently scouring for a 710 (or 720!) in my size.
Found a 25.5" Trek 910 for a screamin' deal and thought "damn, that's gonna be too large."
Once I mounted it though, I knew I had to sell everything else.
Haven't ridden any larger frames than that, but it really sealed the deal for me.
The other shame is I'm a noodle of a person and don't need as stout a tubeset as other people my height. Columbus SP is overkill for me; currently scouring for a 710 (or 720!) in my size.
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2021
Location: Beaverton, OR
Posts: 1,631
Bikes: You had me at rusty and Italian!!
Liked 1,200 Times
in
628 Posts
I’m 5’9 3/4” with a 30” inseam and believed stuff I read that said a 54cm bike was my size. I always felt cramped but thought I just needed to tweak a few settings for proper fit. I hopped on a 56cm bike and all I could think was “This is what I should be riding!” The seat and bars sit a bit low but the rest is fabulous.
merziac were discussing stuff and I saw the light that stand over is BS. Traditional thought says if you are on the border between sizes get the smaller. That doesn’t work for me but that’s why there are a bazillion kinds of beer.
merziac were discussing stuff and I saw the light that stand over is BS. Traditional thought says if you are on the border between sizes get the smaller. That doesn’t work for me but that’s why there are a bazillion kinds of beer.
Likes For RustyJames:
#20
Junior Member
#21
Senior Member
Steve in Peoria
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2019
Location: Michigan USA
Posts: 1,064
Bikes: A bunch of old bikes.
Liked 1,098 Times
in
500 Posts
I usually ride a 58cm, but I do have one a bit larger. My 82 Araya Road 821 is a 25", but it is measured CTT. It is comfortable with the seat low since the top tube is only 22" CTC.
Likes For daverup:
#23
Henderson, NV
Join Date: Jan 2022
Location: Henderson/Las Vegas NV
Posts: 691
Bikes: Trek Alpha 3700, GT STS DH, Raleigh Grand Prix, Fisher Montare, Fisher CR-7, Fisher Aquila, Diamondback Sorrento, The Bike Beat Revolution, KHS XC 504R
Liked 790 Times
in
384 Posts
I'm 6' with a 32" inseam. I ride a Raleigh Grand Prix that is slightly too large but I'm comfortable riding it. The seat is bottomed out but at least it isn't stuck. I do have to stand on my toes to straddle it and the top tube does contact the jewels.I've gotten used to leaning to one side when straddling the bike. I ride flat pedals with no clips.
A quick measurment (+- 1/8"); Top tube 22.5" ,seat tube is 25.5" , head tube 8.5"
A quick measurment (+- 1/8"); Top tube 22.5" ,seat tube is 25.5" , head tube 8.5"
#24
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: PDX
Posts: 13,587
Bikes: Merz x 5 + Specialized Merz Allez x 2, Strawberry/Newlands/DiNucci/Ti x3, Gordon, Fuso/Moulton x2, Bornstein, Paisley,1958-74 Paramounts x3, 3rensho, 74 Moto TC, 73-78 Raleigh Pro's x5, Marinoni x2, 1960 Cinelli SC, 1980 Bianchi SC, PX-10 X 2
Liked 6,881 Times
in
3,926 Posts
I rode many 60-57cm frames despite being 6'3" with 34"+ inseam.
Found a 25.5" Trek 910 for a screamin' deal and thought "damn, that's gonna be too large."
Once I mounted it though, I knew I had to sell everything else.
Haven't ridden any larger frames than that, but it really sealed the deal for me.
The other shame is I'm a noodle of a person and don't need as stout a tubeset as other people my height. Columbus SP is overkill for me; currently scouring for a 710 (or 720!) in my size.
Found a 25.5" Trek 910 for a screamin' deal and thought "damn, that's gonna be too large."
Once I mounted it though, I knew I had to sell everything else.
Haven't ridden any larger frames than that, but it really sealed the deal for me.
The other shame is I'm a noodle of a person and don't need as stout a tubeset as other people my height. Columbus SP is overkill for me; currently scouring for a 710 (or 720!) in my size.
Likes For merziac: