BSA (BB) on vintage frame
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: South Italy
Posts: 1,056
Bikes: BMC SLR01; Cannondale Trail; Lot's of project and vintage bikes..
Liked 169 Times
in
102 Posts
BSA (BB) on vintage frame
Hello!
I'm converting a 90' frame into a gravel-monster bike.
Actually in the build setup there is a square bottom bracket, for now it is okay but in a future i want to swap into a bsa type.
There are two problems that i think may occurs.
1- Treads on the frame probably are shorter than the cups itself.
2- What about the axle? are they available in shorter size? with a square taper there is not really a problem since i can fit a longer type.
if you need further information:
- Rear hub is 142mm
- 10s cassette
- i don't have the frame right now, but i have a similar frame laying around. I can measure the bottom bracket housing for an hypothetical calculation.
I'm converting a 90' frame into a gravel-monster bike.
Actually in the build setup there is a square bottom bracket, for now it is okay but in a future i want to swap into a bsa type.
There are two problems that i think may occurs.
1- Treads on the frame probably are shorter than the cups itself.
2- What about the axle? are they available in shorter size? with a square taper there is not really a problem since i can fit a longer type.
if you need further information:
- Rear hub is 142mm
- 10s cassette
- i don't have the frame right now, but i have a similar frame laying around. I can measure the bottom bracket housing for an hypothetical calculation.
#2
SE Wis
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Posts: 10,811
Bikes: '68 Raleigh Sprite, '02 Raleigh C500, '84 Raleigh Gran Prix, '91 Trek 400, 2013 Novara Randonee, 1990 Trek 970
Liked 3,655 Times
in
2,201 Posts
BSA aka English isn't a "type" but a threading standard of the BB shell.
https://www.parktool.com/en-us/blog/...identification
https://www.parktool.com/en-us/blog/...identification
Likes For dedhed:
#3
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: South Italy
Posts: 1,056
Bikes: BMC SLR01; Cannondale Trail; Lot's of project and vintage bikes..
Liked 169 Times
in
102 Posts
BSA aka English isn't a "type" but a threading standard of the BB shell.
https://www.parktool.com/en-us/blog/...identification
https://www.parktool.com/en-us/blog/...identification
#4
BSA aka English isn't a "type" but a threading standard of the BB shell.
https://www.parktool.com/en-us/blog/...identification
https://www.parktool.com/en-us/blog/...identification
TLDR: BSA is a company, BSC is a thread standard, but if you call it BSA people will mostly know what you mean; likewise it could well now be ISO not BSC but they're mostly interchangeable.
Likes For grumpus:
#5
Likes For grumpus:
#6
Hello!
I'm converting a 90' frame into a gravel-monster bike.
Actually in the build setup there is a square bottom bracket, for now it is okay but in a future i want to swap into a bsa type.
There are two problems that i think may occurs.
1- Treads on the frame probably are shorter than the cups itself.
2- What about the axle? are they available in shorter size? with a square taper there is not really a problem since i can fit a longer type.
if you need further information:
- Rear hub is 142mm
- 10s cassette
- i don't have the frame right now, but i have a similar frame laying around. I can measure the bottom bracket housing for an hypothetical calculation.
I'm converting a 90' frame into a gravel-monster bike.
Actually in the build setup there is a square bottom bracket, for now it is okay but in a future i want to swap into a bsa type.
There are two problems that i think may occurs.
1- Treads on the frame probably are shorter than the cups itself.
2- What about the axle? are they available in shorter size? with a square taper there is not really a problem since i can fit a longer type.
if you need further information:
- Rear hub is 142mm
- 10s cassette
- i don't have the frame right now, but i have a similar frame laying around. I can measure the bottom bracket housing for an hypothetical calculation.
You have a '90s frame with a 142mm rear triangle spread? That seems unlikely. 142 is generally through axle width - which didn't exist in the '90s.
Likes For Kontact:
#7
I'm converting a 90' frame into a gravel-monster bike.
Actually in the build setup there is a square bottom bracket, for now it is okay but in a future i want to swap into a bsa type.
There are two problems that i think may occurs.
1- Treads on the frame probably are shorter than the cups itself.
2- What about the axle? are they available in shorter size? with a square taper there is not really a problem since i can fit a longer type.
Actually in the build setup there is a square bottom bracket, for now it is okay but in a future i want to swap into a bsa type.
There are two problems that i think may occurs.
1- Treads on the frame probably are shorter than the cups itself.
2- What about the axle? are they available in shorter size? with a square taper there is not really a problem since i can fit a longer type.
#8
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: South Italy
Posts: 1,056
Bikes: BMC SLR01; Cannondale Trail; Lot's of project and vintage bikes..
Liked 169 Times
in
102 Posts
That's called an external cup BB, and they are used with specific cranks. They should work on bikes with English/BSA threads as that is what they were designed for.
You have a '90s frame with a 142mm rear triangle spread? That seems unlikely. 142 is generally through axle width - which didn't exist in the '90s.
You have a '90s frame with a 142mm rear triangle spread? That seems unlikely. 142 is generally through axle width - which didn't exist in the '90s.
#9
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: South Italy
Posts: 1,056
Bikes: BMC SLR01; Cannondale Trail; Lot's of project and vintage bikes..
Liked 169 Times
in
102 Posts
sure, i learned english by myself and sometimes is not very good.
i'll try again to explain.
ofc those are just assumptions
- bottom bracket's shells probably have a longer tread length than the classical one.
- if i fit those sheels plus some spacers, i will be able to use an hollow tech axle? there are possibility that the axle will be longer and do not fit properly?
i'll try again to explain.
ofc those are just assumptions
- bottom bracket's shells probably have a longer tread length than the classical one.
- if i fit those sheels plus some spacers, i will be able to use an hollow tech axle? there are possibility that the axle will be longer and do not fit properly?
#10
sure, i learned english by myself and sometimes is not very good.
i'll try again to explain.
ofc those are just assumptions
- bottom bracket's shells probably have a longer tread length than the classical one.
- if i fit those sheels plus some spacers, i will be able to use an hollow tech axle? there are possibility that the axle will be longer and do not fit properly?
i'll try again to explain.
ofc those are just assumptions
- bottom bracket's shells probably have a longer tread length than the classical one.
- if i fit those sheels plus some spacers, i will be able to use an hollow tech axle? there are possibility that the axle will be longer and do not fit properly?
You can't use spacers unless they are necessary to convert a 68mm BB shell to work with a crank intended for a 73mm BB shell - like an MTB crank.
#12
SE Wis
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Posts: 10,811
Bikes: '68 Raleigh Sprite, '02 Raleigh C500, '84 Raleigh Gran Prix, '91 Trek 400, 2013 Novara Randonee, 1990 Trek 970
Liked 3,655 Times
in
2,201 Posts
The external BB cups in your photo will thread without issue into a 90's frame. But you have to verify if the frames BB shell threading, either English or Italian depending on what frame although most likely English. You also have to measure BB shell width 68mm road, 73mm Mt. The cranks that fit those are 2 piece and axle width is fixed and come in 2 diameters, 24mm Shimano and 30mm FSA etc and the BB bearings have to be sized accordingly.
Square taper BB come in either cup & cone or cartridge with varying axle widths as well as offsets. Square taper cranks require the correct (or "close enough") length and/or offset to position the crank and rings to clear the frame and give correct chain line.
Given your 142mm proposed spacing what is the proposed chain line going to be?
https://www.parktool.com/en-us/blog/...nline-concepts
Square taper BB come in either cup & cone or cartridge with varying axle widths as well as offsets. Square taper cranks require the correct (or "close enough") length and/or offset to position the crank and rings to clear the frame and give correct chain line.
Given your 142mm proposed spacing what is the proposed chain line going to be?
https://www.parktool.com/en-us/blog/...nline-concepts
#14
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: South Italy
Posts: 1,056
Bikes: BMC SLR01; Cannondale Trail; Lot's of project and vintage bikes..
Liked 169 Times
in
102 Posts
The external BB cups in your photo will thread without issue into a 90's frame. But you have to verify if the frames BB shell threading, either English or Italian depending on what frame although most likely English. You also have to measure BB shell width 68mm road, 73mm Mt. The cranks that fit those are 2 piece and axle width is fixed and come in 2 diameters, 24mm Shimano and 30mm FSA etc and the BB bearings have to be sized accordingly.
Square taper BB come in either cup & cone or cartridge with varying axle widths as well as offsets. Square taper cranks require the correct (or "close enough") length and/or offset to position the crank and rings to clear the frame and give correct chain line.
Given your 142mm proposed spacing what is the proposed chain line going to be?
https://www.parktool.com/en-us/blog/...nline-concepts
Square taper BB come in either cup & cone or cartridge with varying axle widths as well as offsets. Square taper cranks require the correct (or "close enough") length and/or offset to position the crank and rings to clear the frame and give correct chain line.
Given your 142mm proposed spacing what is the proposed chain line going to be?
https://www.parktool.com/en-us/blog/...nline-concepts
#15