New York, New York
#26
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Just an update. Seems like NYC's congestion pricing plan has hit a road block.... pardon the pun
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/laws-...l&uh_test=0_00
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/laws-...l&uh_test=0_00
A bedrock federal law designed to protect the environment and empower local communities is being weaponized to block progress on climate change, infrastructure and housing.
The battle over New York City’s landmark congestion price plan is the latest example.
After more than 50 years of efforts to implement a toll program that would slash greenhouse emissions from cars and reduce congestion in lower Manhattan, the plan cleared a milestone in May, when the federal government signed off on the release of an environmental assessment.
Then, last month, New Jersey sued to block the plan, citing the National Environmental Policy Act of 1970 (NEPA). The law requires federal agencies to give a detailed assessment of the environmental impact before approving projects that could significantly alter the environmental landscape.
The battle over New York City’s landmark congestion price plan is the latest example.
After more than 50 years of efforts to implement a toll program that would slash greenhouse emissions from cars and reduce congestion in lower Manhattan, the plan cleared a milestone in May, when the federal government signed off on the release of an environmental assessment.
Then, last month, New Jersey sued to block the plan, citing the National Environmental Policy Act of 1970 (NEPA). The law requires federal agencies to give a detailed assessment of the environmental impact before approving projects that could significantly alter the environmental landscape.
#27
Punk Rock Lives
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Throughout the west in a van, on my bike, and in the forest
Posts: 3,357
Bikes: Long Haul Trucker with BRIFTERS!
Liked 72 Times
in
57 Posts
The "congestion" fee is really nothing more than an attempt to get fees to be more related to "marginal costs," as economists say, rather than "average costs," upon which fees and levies are usually based. This has been a policy advocated by economists for years. I like the idea for that reason; in addition, I like anything as an alternative to the gas tax, which should have been repealed years ago, especially at the federal level.
#29
I think Granada, Spain. I was there in ‘98, before such concept. On some corners it was difficult to have a conversation with the person next to you while waiting for the traffic light. It was that loud, especially with all the students on scooters.
#30
I support congestion pricing but I will say that from the New Jersey perspective, most of the daily commuter trains (NJ Transit) go through a single pair of tunnels under the Hudson River that are over 100 years old and were badly damaged from Superstorm Sandy. Those tunnels are also used by Amtrak, and there's an equally old and unreliable bridge Portal Bridge) that is also used. When there are issues with either the tunnels or bridge, commuting grinds to a halt, easily turning a 1+ hour commute into 2+ hours.
There are plans to replace both tunnels and the bridge but they haven't even broken ground yet so the fix is likely a dozen years off.
What congestion pricing might do is push a system at its limits over the brink.
New York City's MTA has its own issues as well, but New Jersey's are arguably worse.
There are plans to replace both tunnels and the bridge but they haven't even broken ground yet so the fix is likely a dozen years off.
What congestion pricing might do is push a system at its limits over the brink.
New York City's MTA has its own issues as well, but New Jersey's are arguably worse.
I work in the rail biz. The Hudson Tubes are going to fail sooner rather than later. Let’s hope they don’t do so catastrophically. Time to stop playing politics with something that everyone knows is critical.
Likes For indyfabz:
#32
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: South shore, L.I., NY
Posts: 7,364
Bikes: Flyxii FR322, Cannondale Topstone, Miyata City Liner, Specialized Chisel, Specialized Epic Evo
Liked 2,438 Times
in
1,375 Posts
There was a plan a long time ago, but Christie effectively killed it.
I work in the rail biz. The Hudson Tubes are going to fail sooner rather than later. Let’s hope they don’t do so catastrophically. Time to stop playing politics with something that everyone knows is critical.
I work in the rail biz. The Hudson Tubes are going to fail sooner rather than later. Let’s hope they don’t do so catastrophically. Time to stop playing politics with something that everyone knows is critical.
Likes For Steve B.:
#33
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: South shore, L.I., NY
Posts: 7,364
Bikes: Flyxii FR322, Cannondale Topstone, Miyata City Liner, Specialized Chisel, Specialized Epic Evo
Liked 2,438 Times
in
1,375 Posts
It’s a common Google search. I was in Florence, Italy in ‘06, it was in use then,
#34
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: South shore, L.I., NY
Posts: 7,364
Bikes: Flyxii FR322, Cannondale Topstone, Miyata City Liner, Specialized Chisel, Specialized Epic Evo
Liked 2,438 Times
in
1,375 Posts
It’s a common Google search. I was in Florence, Italy in ‘06, it was in use then,
Likes For Steve B.:
#35
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: South shore, L.I., NY
Posts: 7,364
Bikes: Flyxii FR322, Cannondale Topstone, Miyata City Liner, Specialized Chisel, Specialized Epic Evo
Liked 2,438 Times
in
1,375 Posts
The "congestion" fee is really nothing more than an attempt to get fees to be more related to "marginal costs," as economists say, rather than "average costs," upon which fees and levies are usually based. This has been a policy advocated by economists for years. I like the idea for that reason; in addition, I like anything as an alternative to the gas tax, which should have been repealed years ago, especially at the federal level.
Likes For Steve B.:
#36
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: falfurrias texas
Posts: 1,030
Bikes: wabi classic (stolen & recovered)
Liked 1,175 Times
in
887 Posts
another regressive idea that burdens the average joe and does nothing for NY bicyclists' fantasy of car free streets ....................... can't wait for the gaseous reaction
#37
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 5,982
Bikes: 2022 Salsa Beargrease Carbon Deore 11, 2020 Salsa Warbird GRX 600, 2020 Canyon Ultimate CF SLX disc 9.0 Di2, 2020 Catrike Eola, 2016 Masi cxgr, 2011, Felt F3 Ltd, 2010 Trek 2.1, 2009 KHS Flite 220
Liked 3,394 Times
in
2,111 Posts
And just in case you didn't get the memo, taxation is widely used by governments to modulate demand. Take for example, large excise taxes on gasoline in Europe and other places outside our little bubble.
As to your prefatory comment about weather, so what? Do you think people are MORE likely to drive into Manhattan in a snow storm? My guess is you don't know much about NYC.
#38
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: South shore, L.I., NY
Posts: 7,364
Bikes: Flyxii FR322, Cannondale Topstone, Miyata City Liner, Specialized Chisel, Specialized Epic Evo
Liked 2,438 Times
in
1,375 Posts
I suspect you have an innnacurate picture of how the “Average Joe” gets into and out of Manhattan. Most use subways as that’s the cheapest method. Driving into and parking costs far more, but offers the advantage of accessing some of the harder to reach corners of the borough not easily reached by subway, the entire west side from the teens north come to mind. Thus having congestion pricing add money to the mass transit system actually is helping Mr Average Joe. Maybe the 2nd Av. Subway will get finished earlier than currently planned. That means Joe doesn’t have to transfer to a slow bus. The goal as well is not car free, just car less. That will certainly help cyclists.
Likes For Steve B.:
#39
Likes For indyfabz:
#40
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: South shore, L.I., NY
Posts: 7,364
Bikes: Flyxii FR322, Cannondale Topstone, Miyata City Liner, Specialized Chisel, Specialized Epic Evo
Liked 2,438 Times
in
1,375 Posts
It's obvious that with a few hundred thousand commuters from NJ into Manhattan each day that the mass transit infrastructure for these folks is grossly inadequate. There's NJ Transit to Penn Station, 2 different PATH lines that are hugely inadequate, ferries and cars. NYC is about to make it expensive to drive and they should, but the case could be made that NJ's governments have not done enough to ease the pain of it's residents needing to get into NYC. Chis Christie vetoed initial attempts to get the Hudson NJ Transit (and AMTRAK tunnels) re-built, with him gone it's only now getting started. And lets not forget how he decided one day to **** all those driving in in his pissy fit against the mayor of Fort Lee when Christie essentially closed access to the GW bridge. He's singularly unfit to be a President.
Likes For Steve B.:
#41
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Oahu, HI
Posts: 1,415
Bikes: 89 Paramount OS 84 Fuji Touring Series III New! 2013 Focus Izalco Ergoride
Likes: 0
Liked 76 Times
in
56 Posts
Whatever happens with "congestion" pricing, if there is a benefit it will go to e-bikes (and other e-things) who will run you down on your pedal bike.
scott s.
.
scott s.
.
Likes For blacknbluebikes:
#43
Here in Tokyo we have more people commuting by bike every day than the entire United States combined. Tokyo doesn’t have “congestion pricing,” or any other strategy to keep cars out of the busier districts. What it does have are traffic laws which make motor vehicles automatically responsible for any accident with a bicycle or pedestrian, even of the cyclist or pedestrian is at fault. Tokyo also has clean, efficient, and frequent public transportation (most of which is actually privately owned). This keeps Tokyo’s roads reasonably safe for cycling, despite the near 100% lack of dedicated bicycle lanes, and public transportation is so convenient and well-operated that people are more likely to use it.
The Metro area in Tokyo has nearly twice as many people as Metro New York, and lots of vehicle traffic, but you very seldom hear horns, whereas in NYC, blowing one’s horn seems to be required any time a vehicle accelerates, decelerates, or changes lanes.
Tokyo refuses to restrict cars because private transportation is essential to many people, it brings workers, business people, and customers in and out of the city, and hindering these people causes more harm than good. Like NYC, driving in Tokyo is not very pleasant, which means those who drive do so only because they have to. And the people of Japan, Tokyo in particular, don’t trust the government to properly manage any congestion fees they might collect. It was rampant mismanagement of Japan’s public transportation which caused most of it to be taken out of the hands of government and privatized. Since then, it has become arguably the most efficient system in the world.
The Metro area in Tokyo has nearly twice as many people as Metro New York, and lots of vehicle traffic, but you very seldom hear horns, whereas in NYC, blowing one’s horn seems to be required any time a vehicle accelerates, decelerates, or changes lanes.
Tokyo refuses to restrict cars because private transportation is essential to many people, it brings workers, business people, and customers in and out of the city, and hindering these people causes more harm than good. Like NYC, driving in Tokyo is not very pleasant, which means those who drive do so only because they have to. And the people of Japan, Tokyo in particular, don’t trust the government to properly manage any congestion fees they might collect. It was rampant mismanagement of Japan’s public transportation which caused most of it to be taken out of the hands of government and privatized. Since then, it has become arguably the most efficient system in the world.
Likes For 50PlusCycling:
#44
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Just an update. Seems like NYC's congestion pricing plan has hit a road block.... pardon the pun
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/laws-...l&uh_test=0_00
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/laws-...l&uh_test=0_00
Congestion pricing for NYC is dead, but not because of what the NJ Governor did, according to the last roadblock, rather it was New York's own Governor that killed it...and she was a staunch supporter
#45
Off topic but I want to share a good experience with a driver today in Manhattan during the rush hour time. I was riding on the 3rd avenue mid-uptown around 6 PM-ish when the light turned red. I stopped behind an SUV (which had just passed me) slightly to its left, between it and a parked car on the left, with the gap too narrow for me to pass through. My front light was flashing, so maybe that's how the driver realized I was behind him and hoping to pass through. I noticed the front wheels of the SUV started turning toward the right (the traffic light was still red), and he moved the SUV a few steps to the right so that there was enough space for me to pass through. I walked my bike through the gap and thanked the driver, he nodded and smiled.
Likes For vol:
#46
Ride more, eat less
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Philla PA, Hoboken NJ, Brooklyn NY
Posts: 2,141
Bikes: Too many but never enough.
Liked 817 Times
in
501 Posts
Maybe not limited to NYC, but It turns out cyclists actually should roll through stop signs.
Here’s why:
https://electrek.co/2024/09/10/it-tu...gns-heres-why/
Here’s why:
https://electrek.co/2024/09/10/it-tu...gns-heres-why/
#47
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Maybe not limited to NYC, but It turns out cyclists actually should roll through stop signs.
Here’s why:
https://electrek.co/2024/09/10/it-tu...gns-heres-why/
Here’s why:
https://electrek.co/2024/09/10/it-tu...gns-heres-why/
Below are just a few excerpts from the article that are contradictory to the idea of treating a Stop Sign as a Yield Sign. The fact is there are times an operator of a vehicle must stop at a Yield sign. And the usage of "Blow Through" only emphasizes this incorrect idea behind Yield signs.
I'm also sick of hearing about how important momentum is to a cyclist. Momentum is important to all operators of a vehicle and one could even make a case of momentum being more important to operators of cars, because that would reduce gas consumption, further reducing emissions, blah, blah, blah....
I see far too many cyclists come to an intersection with Stop signs, only to roll thru and expect everyone else to stop and wait. That is not following the requirements of the Idaho Stop law and it's not how a Yield sign works. There are no blow thrus and momentum is not some sacred cow.
...more studies are showing that the best way to protect cyclists at the most dangerous point on their rides is to simply let them blow through stop signs in what is commonly known as an “Idaho stop”. ....
...cyclists are permitted to treat stop signs as yield signs, meaning they slow down and look for traffic before continuing through, no full stop required. ...
....The study found that cyclists preferred the Idaho stop method (which is pretty obvious for a vehicle that works largely by maintaining momentum), ....
...cyclists are permitted to treat stop signs as yield signs, meaning they slow down and look for traffic before continuing through, no full stop required. ...
....The study found that cyclists preferred the Idaho stop method (which is pretty obvious for a vehicle that works largely by maintaining momentum), ....
This video does a pretty good job at showing how to practice the Idaho Stop Law.
Likes For work4bike: