Pix of my huge viner!!
#1
gentleman of leisure
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Washington DC
Posts: 669
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Pix of my huge viner!!
+)
the pix aren't that great actually. but i just had my first 24miler on my new Viner Competition from GVHbikes.com and i wanted to show some love. Gary at GVH was just as great as everybody here said he'd be and i'm another satisfied customer.
i got a classy looking lugged italian steel frame with full Ultegra, Ritchie wheels and a low-end Viner carbon fork. (the carbonesque decals on the seat stays are kinda corny but whatever..)
the shipped price was $1410. $1295 plus $25 for the triple and $50 for the fork upgrade and $40 shipping to the east coast.
i bought this bike because i wanted a steel frame and i'm 6'4.5" so there were limited options in my size and price range. this is a 64cm c-c, with a 61.5cm top tube.
the stem is a 14cm - i maybe would fit better on a 13 but i'm gonna try this for now and see how it goes - gary at gvhbikes will exchange stems for free btw.
the ride is both smooth and lively as far as i can tell - but i have very little to compare it to since i'm coming from a seven year old cheap alum GT. maybe the lively part just comes from the fact that the bike weighs 21.5 lbs (on my bathroom scale) - my old alum bike is actually several lbs heavier! i'm very happy with how light the bike feels considering it's steel and a huge frame.
and a big thanks to everybody here for the patient advice when i was one of those "Help me choose a new bike" threads.
the pix aren't that great actually. but i just had my first 24miler on my new Viner Competition from GVHbikes.com and i wanted to show some love. Gary at GVH was just as great as everybody here said he'd be and i'm another satisfied customer.
i got a classy looking lugged italian steel frame with full Ultegra, Ritchie wheels and a low-end Viner carbon fork. (the carbonesque decals on the seat stays are kinda corny but whatever..)
the shipped price was $1410. $1295 plus $25 for the triple and $50 for the fork upgrade and $40 shipping to the east coast.
i bought this bike because i wanted a steel frame and i'm 6'4.5" so there were limited options in my size and price range. this is a 64cm c-c, with a 61.5cm top tube.
the stem is a 14cm - i maybe would fit better on a 13 but i'm gonna try this for now and see how it goes - gary at gvhbikes will exchange stems for free btw.
the ride is both smooth and lively as far as i can tell - but i have very little to compare it to since i'm coming from a seven year old cheap alum GT. maybe the lively part just comes from the fact that the bike weighs 21.5 lbs (on my bathroom scale) - my old alum bike is actually several lbs heavier! i'm very happy with how light the bike feels considering it's steel and a huge frame.
and a big thanks to everybody here for the patient advice when i was one of those "Help me choose a new bike" threads.
#2
What?
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: N. Tx
Posts: 1,650
Bikes: Bianchi Brava(retired), Surly Instigator(retired)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
that is the longest stem I have ever seen. But that bike is AWESOME! looking
#3
Beausage is Beautiful
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Saitama, Japan
Posts: 5,504
Bikes: Nabiis Alchemy
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 13 Times
in
8 Posts
I think your bike is taller than I am. Very nice.
__________________
Yo. Everything I’m doing is linked on What’s up with Dave? but most of note currently is Somewhere in Japan.
Yo. Everything I’m doing is linked on What’s up with Dave? but most of note currently is Somewhere in Japan.
#5
Über member!
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Sunnyvale, CA.
Posts: 993
Bikes: 2004 Albert Eisentraut
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Man, the bike is so big (look at the size of the head tube!!) that the wheels look like they are 650s
#6
Work hard, Play hard
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: San Diego, California
Posts: 2,596
Bikes: Cannondale super V 500, Bianchi Piaggio(hopefully getting a new road bike when I get some money)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
nice!
#7
gentleman of leisure
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Washington DC
Posts: 669
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
thx folks -
yeah the bike is quite a bit bigger than my old bike, but it fits me that much better too so the fact that it's a bit freakish is kinda endearing if that makes any sense.
yeah the bike is quite a bit bigger than my old bike, but it fits me that much better too so the fact that it's a bit freakish is kinda endearing if that makes any sense.
#8
Super Modest
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Central Illinois
Posts: 23,466
Bikes: Trek Emonda, Giant Propel, Colnago V3, Co-Motion Supremo, ICE VTX WC
Mentioned: 107 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10963 Post(s)
Liked 4,620 Times
in
2,123 Posts
My first real racing bike was an '83 Viner. BTW, if I remember correctly, Viner is from the builder's name, VIviano NERozzi. (excuse any misspelling)
#9
gentleman of leisure
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Washington DC
Posts: 669
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
just did my first 50miler today on the Viner Comp and boy does that steel frame feel dreamy compared to my crap old 7005 series alum GT. no more neck pain for me, baby!
#10
I love my life!
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Fullerton, CA
Posts: 280
Bikes: Univega 1985? Sportour
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Boze, I rode a tiny "pacifica" mtb to work everyday for a month.
When I slid unto my bike, a 58cm Univega I was so excited. I feel your joy (and past pain). I'm 6'2" and I raised the stem a ton 4"? on my Univega. Wonderful for cruising.
Anyway, congrats. I'm interested if us taller riders get more leverage or something with our added heighth.. I'll do some research and if I can't find anything, I'll post.
Congrats!
When I slid unto my bike, a 58cm Univega I was so excited. I feel your joy (and past pain). I'm 6'2" and I raised the stem a ton 4"? on my Univega. Wonderful for cruising.
Anyway, congrats. I'm interested if us taller riders get more leverage or something with our added heighth.. I'll do some research and if I can't find anything, I'll post.
Congrats!
#12
Banned.
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Towson, MD
Posts: 4,020
Bikes: 2001 Look KG 241, 1989 Specialized Stump Jumper Comp, 1986 Gatane Performanc
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Nice bike!
But I am curious, what is your inseam and sleeve length? I can't believe you are only 1/2 taller than I am and ride a bike 5 cm larger with 3 cm longer top tube, show about as much seat post as my bike and ride the same length stem. Are you all legs and arms?
But I am curious, what is your inseam and sleeve length? I can't believe you are only 1/2 taller than I am and ride a bike 5 cm larger with 3 cm longer top tube, show about as much seat post as my bike and ride the same length stem. Are you all legs and arms?
#13
gentleman of leisure
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Washington DC
Posts: 669
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
hi galen -
three things to say about the size thing.
1) the 64cm c-c Viner may in fact be a bit large for me. Since I bought it online I couldn't really check out the 63 vs. the 64 (which had a full inch difference in top tube length).
2) i've since exchanged the stem for a 120mm (which still seems longer - that one in the pic was a 135 but it seemed longer too) so that reduces the overall reach a bit.
3) i do yoga and i'm pretty flexible in my lower back so i don't have as much of that rounded back curve as some people and I think i reach out farther as a result.
the bike fits me pretty well now i think - when i get my Brooks Team Competition saddle for xmas I'll be just about set. I'll bet I would have fit fine on the 63 or even a shorter stem on this frame, but i'm very comfortable none-the-less and at the time all I knew was that I wanted a bigger steel frame than any of the shops had in DC.
my inseam is 36" but i'm not sure what my sleeve lenth is. i have long limbs but a long torso as well - me liking the fit of this bike is probably a combination of the yoga flexibility thing combined with being stuck on an alum frame that was too small for me for so many years. almost nobody makes a steel frame with a longer TT than like 59.5 and Lemond didn't seem like a good option because their new bikes only go up to like 62cm c-t i think. plus it's irrelevant really because i couldn't afford a good Lemond or a custom Gunnar - it was pretty much the bike I got or maybe a 63cm Bianchi Imola (and i don't like semi-compact geometry) or maybe something off eBay.
i should have a friend take a pic of me on the bike to see if folks here think i fit it okay from just looking at me on it....
have a good weekend and thanks for checking in.
can you believe how long-winded my posts are?? +)
three things to say about the size thing.
1) the 64cm c-c Viner may in fact be a bit large for me. Since I bought it online I couldn't really check out the 63 vs. the 64 (which had a full inch difference in top tube length).
2) i've since exchanged the stem for a 120mm (which still seems longer - that one in the pic was a 135 but it seemed longer too) so that reduces the overall reach a bit.
3) i do yoga and i'm pretty flexible in my lower back so i don't have as much of that rounded back curve as some people and I think i reach out farther as a result.
the bike fits me pretty well now i think - when i get my Brooks Team Competition saddle for xmas I'll be just about set. I'll bet I would have fit fine on the 63 or even a shorter stem on this frame, but i'm very comfortable none-the-less and at the time all I knew was that I wanted a bigger steel frame than any of the shops had in DC.
my inseam is 36" but i'm not sure what my sleeve lenth is. i have long limbs but a long torso as well - me liking the fit of this bike is probably a combination of the yoga flexibility thing combined with being stuck on an alum frame that was too small for me for so many years. almost nobody makes a steel frame with a longer TT than like 59.5 and Lemond didn't seem like a good option because their new bikes only go up to like 62cm c-t i think. plus it's irrelevant really because i couldn't afford a good Lemond or a custom Gunnar - it was pretty much the bike I got or maybe a 63cm Bianchi Imola (and i don't like semi-compact geometry) or maybe something off eBay.
i should have a friend take a pic of me on the bike to see if folks here think i fit it okay from just looking at me on it....
have a good weekend and thanks for checking in.
can you believe how long-winded my posts are?? +)
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Triangle, NC
Posts: 1,480
Bikes: S-Works Tarmac
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 182 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I believe you are on the right size bike. Far too often today people are put on bikes much too small. Just because the 25 year old cat racers run smallish frames doesn't mean they are best for people like you and me.
I am 6'2" with a 35.5" inseam and ride either 62 c-c or 63 c-t, if I want to ride comfortably. A few years back some dealer put me on a 61cm c-t and it was the most uncomfortable ride I ever had. When I finally did the stem/quill and seat post adjusted half way properly for me then they were much too far out of proportion. The bike was still too quick and nervous due to it's unusual set-up to wheelbase. The biggest mistake dealers make today is putting people on bikes too small. The age old French frame sizing forumla of roughly inseam (in cm) - 25 or 26 for large riders is as true today as yesterday.
I am 6'2" with a 35.5" inseam and ride either 62 c-c or 63 c-t, if I want to ride comfortably. A few years back some dealer put me on a 61cm c-t and it was the most uncomfortable ride I ever had. When I finally did the stem/quill and seat post adjusted half way properly for me then they were much too far out of proportion. The bike was still too quick and nervous due to it's unusual set-up to wheelbase. The biggest mistake dealers make today is putting people on bikes too small. The age old French frame sizing forumla of roughly inseam (in cm) - 25 or 26 for large riders is as true today as yesterday.
#15
gentleman of leisure
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Washington DC
Posts: 669
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
thx for the affirmation, hood.the bike sure is comfy, i know that much - i'm a total steel frame evangelist now when i'm helping friends shop.
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: SE Minnesota
Posts: 12,275
Bikes: are better than yours.
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
Originally Posted by boze
thx for the affirmation, hood.the bike sure is comfy, i know that much - i'm a total steel frame evangelist now when i'm helping friends shop.
Riding big bikes creates some performance trade-offs and whether they should be made depends upon your goals. Since you're riding steel, you're probably not trying to be the fastest guy in your club and you're probably more interested in a comfortable ride rather than the ultimate in performance.
#17
gentleman of leisure
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Washington DC
Posts: 669
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
yeah, that bike is definitely on the heavy side but the thing is i've only really had two seasons of regular riding and the bike i had forever before (back to when i used to bike commute 5 or more years ago) is a heavy old alum frame so i had the unique experience of moving to a lugged steel frame from a 7005 alum frame and _saving weight overall. likely had a lot to do with the components and other stuff but still.
i'm gonna make it heavier still by putting a brooks saddle on it for xmas. this will be based on the same sort of bikeforums feedback that led me to buy a steel frame and i'm sure i'll be just as pleased with the result.
i'm gonna make it heavier still by putting a brooks saddle on it for xmas. this will be based on the same sort of bikeforums feedback that led me to buy a steel frame and i'm sure i'll be just as pleased with the result.
#18
Banned.
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Towson, MD
Posts: 4,020
Bikes: 2001 Look KG 241, 1989 Specialized Stump Jumper Comp, 1986 Gatane Performanc
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by halfspeed
I'm 6' 0" and have a 35" inseam. I ride a 61cm (although my SS is a 63cm!). The "size" is only part of the equation along with the angles, top and head tube length, trail and wheelbase. The advantage of a big frame is that the handle bars get closer to the saddle. This leads to a more upright position when riding on the tops or the hoods. When I rode a smaller bike, I rarely ever used the drops. On a big frame I'm in the drops 30-40% of the time. More on windy days.
#19
Aluminium Crusader :-)
Originally Posted by BeeTL
Funny thread title.
I called GVH the other day to get info about their bikes. During the call I asked how to prounounce Viner.
VEE-nur.
I called GVH the other day to get info about their bikes. During the call I asked how to prounounce Viner.
VEE-nur.
now you're telling me I can't pronounce "Viner".....JEEEEZ
#20
I bleed celeste
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 94
Bikes: Bianchi
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by BeeTL
Funny thread title.
I called GVH the other day to get info about their bikes. During the call I asked how to prounounce Viner.
VEE-nur.
I called GVH the other day to get info about their bikes. During the call I asked how to prounounce Viner.
VEE-nur.
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: SE Minnesota
Posts: 12,275
Bikes: are better than yours.
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
Originally Posted by galen_52657
At 6'4", my inseam is only 1/2" more than yours, so I am long torso/arms short legs. I ride a 59 c-c (61 c-t) frame and always have. I always ram the seat back as far as it will go and use the long stem. The Look I am riding now is short in the top tub so I run a 140 mm stem with a lot of drop betweent the saddle and bars. But, the bike handles fine and I can get plenty low and flat on it. My old steel Bianchi had about 1 cm longer top tube. I do find that for rolling a big gear on the flats or a headwind situation, I ride with hands on the hoods more and use the drops for possition change. But I think that is more of a factor of being able to open up my breathing better on the hoods than anything else.
Based on some of your other posts, a more aggressive posture probably suits you much better than me and you're also probably a lot faster.
#23
Descends Like Avalanche
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Somewhere between Funkytown and Margaritaville, PA
Posts: 5,769
Bikes: Lynskey R240, Sportive, and a Helix Sport disc model in the works; Eddy Merckx MX Leader; Specialized Rock Hopper Comp (1988!)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Originally Posted by Chorus_Girl
Imagine my disappointment when I discovered this thread was about a bike!
#24
Descends Like Avalanche
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Somewhere between Funkytown and Margaritaville, PA
Posts: 5,769
Bikes: Lynskey R240, Sportive, and a Helix Sport disc model in the works; Eddy Merckx MX Leader; Specialized Rock Hopper Comp (1988!)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Gorgeous paint job, by the way!