Just wondering on intentions behind car-free...
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 3,481
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Just wondering on intentions behind car-free...
Just a hypothetical...imagine that there's a car which can run on fuel which:
1. Has no detrimental emmissions
2. Is VERY efficient, can run for long periods of time
3. Creating the fuel for the car adds no detrimental emmissions
4. Creating the car creates no more detrimental emmissions than creating a bike
Would you still be an advocate of car-free? Why?
1. Has no detrimental emmissions
2. Is VERY efficient, can run for long periods of time
3. Creating the fuel for the car adds no detrimental emmissions
4. Creating the car creates no more detrimental emmissions than creating a bike
Would you still be an advocate of car-free? Why?
#2
Super Biker
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Spokane WA
Posts: 1,183
Bikes: 2014 Curtlo, 2006 Serotta Coeur d’Acier, 2005 Independent Fabrication Steel Delux, 2003 Surly 1x1, 2003 Surly Cross Check, 1986 Schwin Worldsport SS commuter, 1980's Mongoose Supergoose
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Hypothetically, yes, I would still be car-free. Environmentalism, as in, zero emissions, is only a small reason for not owning a car.
It would still contribute to urban congestion, promote the general hostility to the fellow man that many seem to posses while driving, , be a waist of money, wouldn't provide exercise, and still wouldn't promote "sustainable" communities. Sorry, I don't buy your argument.
It would still contribute to urban congestion, promote the general hostility to the fellow man that many seem to posses while driving, , be a waist of money, wouldn't provide exercise, and still wouldn't promote "sustainable" communities. Sorry, I don't buy your argument.
#3
無くなった
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Sci-Fi Wasabi
Posts: 5,072
Bikes: I built the Bianchi track bike back up today.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
It mike make me more likely to use one, but I'd still use the bike for 99% of my needs. There's just something about it...
#4
Super Biker
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Spokane WA
Posts: 1,183
Bikes: 2014 Curtlo, 2006 Serotta Coeur d’Acier, 2005 Independent Fabrication Steel Delux, 2003 Surly 1x1, 2003 Surly Cross Check, 1986 Schwin Worldsport SS commuter, 1980's Mongoose Supergoose
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
However, if you could create such a vehicle, I believe it would solve several problems for the our society. The shipping industry, public transportation, emergency vehicles, airplanes, and other systems of infrastructure could certainly use your hypothetical engine...right??
#5
Vanned.
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,244
Bikes: 2006 Motobecane Le Champ SL, 2006 Mercier Kilo TT, 2004 Gary Fisher Tassajara
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
If such a car existed, I would still be turned off by running costs (insurance, energy, registration, etc), but I would consider getting it. But even if I did, I would still commute mostly on bike...it's just too much fun!
#6
Tour de World
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Hinton, AB, canada
Posts: 185
Bikes: Trek 520, Giant Iguana disc
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
ummm they already invented a vehicle like that though...they call it a bike...i think, dont hold me to that, but im pretty sure they are gonna be on the market in 2007. so a solution is near..lol
steve
steve
#7
Every lane is a bike lane
What would it cost to run? Would I still be able to get to work in 15 minutes while everyone else takes 30-45 minutes? How efficient is it in terms of lane-splitting the gridlock?
__________________
I am clinically insane. I am proud of it.
That is all.
I am clinically insane. I am proud of it.
That is all.
#8
cool babies...
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Puget Sound
Posts: 71
Bikes: Surly Long Haul Trucker, Trek fixie(Stolen), Gary Fisher MTB
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I might be more likely to use a car now and then but i wouldnt be more likely to own a car. Environmental reasons are just one part of my decision. I just plain like riding a bike. A car would still cost a chunk of change, and I don't need one. Then there are all of the community issues, congestion, road rage, etc.
#9
Old Noob
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Mid-MN not the end of the world, but you can see it from here
Posts: 155
Bikes: Downtube VIIIFS folder, 2 Strida 3 folders, HP Velotechnik "Grasshopper" and a Burley "Hep Cat"
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by donrhummy
Just a hypothetical...imagine that there's a car which can run on fuel which:
1. Has no detrimental emmissions
2. Is VERY efficient, can run for long periods of time
3. Creating the fuel for the car adds no detrimental emmissions
4. Creating the car creates no more detrimental emmissions than creating a bike
Would you still be an advocate of car-free? Why?
1. Has no detrimental emmissions
2. Is VERY efficient, can run for long periods of time
3. Creating the fuel for the car adds no detrimental emmissions
4. Creating the car creates no more detrimental emmissions than creating a bike
Would you still be an advocate of car-free? Why?
Seems to me that the fact that not having a car will save you 5 to 10 grand a year, PLUS the health benefits and lower costs associated with that should be enough incentive to give a car free life style some serious consideration.
The environmental considerations are really just icing on the cake..... at a personal level
I sometimes look back (quite a few years now) and curse myself for ever buying that first car. 'Course back then, nobody really thought about it all that much, it's just what you did ...... But then again, cars were $2500 bucks and gas was 2 bits a gallon and nobody had even considered running out of it yet.
__________________
Downtube VIII FS folder - his .... 2 - Strida3 folders - his n' hers .... HP Velotechnik Grasshopper - his .... Burley Hep Cat - hers .... Whiz Wheels TT Cruiser W/velo kit - his
.
Ayn Rand was a prophet ..... it isn't my fault
.
Downtube VIII FS folder - his .... 2 - Strida3 folders - his n' hers .... HP Velotechnik Grasshopper - his .... Burley Hep Cat - hers .... Whiz Wheels TT Cruiser W/velo kit - his
.
Ayn Rand was a prophet ..... it isn't my fault
.
#10
Dubito ergo sum.
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Ottawa, ON, Canada
Posts: 1,735
Bikes: Bessie.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by donrhummy
Just a hypothetical...imagine that there's a car which can run on fuel which:
1. Has no detrimental emmissions
2. Is VERY efficient, can run for long periods of time
3. Creating the fuel for the car adds no detrimental emmissions
4. Creating the car creates no more detrimental emmissions than creating a bike
Would you still be an advocate of car-free? Why?
1. Has no detrimental emmissions
2. Is VERY efficient, can run for long periods of time
3. Creating the fuel for the car adds no detrimental emmissions
4. Creating the car creates no more detrimental emmissions than creating a bike
Would you still be an advocate of car-free? Why?
First your example vehicle still uses fuel - energy - and that has to come from somewhere. Even if that fuel results in 'zero emissions' in either use or production, it would still have some environmental impact (e.g. growing crops for a bio-fuel, nuclear power plants for electricity) and that energy is not efficiently used in a private vehicle.
Secondly, what about the resources needed for this vehicle? Are we talking about mere pounds of metal and plastic, as in a bike, or tonnes or material, as in a car? Will this hypothetical vehicle of yours be as resource-efficient as a bike, in terms of how much "stuff" is reserved for the exclusive use of a person's private vehicle?
Thirdly, what is the footprint of this vehicle? Does it need 10' lanes to travel in, or can it comfortably travel in 3'? Does it need huge parking lots, or can a simple rack by the door hold a dozen of them? Will this vehicle of yours substantially reduce the amount of greenspace we pave over, and the cost of road maintenance, as compared to cars?
Finally, or perhaps in summary, will this vehicle of yours be as resource efficient in ALL WAYS as walking, cycling, and public transit?
Reducing emissions is an important priority, since that is the most direct harm cars cause humans. Even if you solved the emissions issue, however, the other detrimental aspects of a car still make them an irresponsible and non-sustainable mode of transportation in urban centres.
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 107
Bikes: A great one!
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Originally Posted by donrhummy
Just a hypothetical...imagine that there's a car which can run on fuel which:
1. Has no detrimental emmissions
2. Is VERY efficient, can run for long periods of time
3. Creating the fuel for the car adds no detrimental emmissions
4. Creating the car creates no more detrimental emmissions than creating a bike
Would you still be an advocate of car-free? Why?
1. Has no detrimental emmissions
2. Is VERY efficient, can run for long periods of time
3. Creating the fuel for the car adds no detrimental emmissions
4. Creating the car creates no more detrimental emmissions than creating a bike
Would you still be an advocate of car-free? Why?
Also, if the potential of causing accidents and harming others would still be great, I wouldn't be very sympathetic to using it either.
#12
Sweetened with Splenda
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Brooklyn, Alabama
Posts: 2,335
Bikes: Too many 80s roadbikes!
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I think I'd still be an angrier person while driving such a car. I like being less angry and less tense; I think I'll stick with the bike.
#13
Live Deliberately.
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 735
Bikes: CETMA Cargo, Surly Big Dummy, Surly Straggler, Rocky Mountain Blizzard
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 14 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Ummm...isn't that called a bike?
1. Has no detrimental emmissions
2. Is VERY efficient, can run for long periods of time
3. Creating the fuel for the car adds no detrimental emmissions
4. Creating the car creates no more detrimental emmissions than creating a bike
1. Has no detrimental emmissions
2. Is VERY efficient, can run for long periods of time
3. Creating the fuel for the car adds no detrimental emmissions
4. Creating the car creates no more detrimental emmissions than creating a bike
#14
Banned
Originally Posted by donrhummy
Just a hypothetical...imagine that there's a car which can run on fuel which:
1. Has no detrimental emmissions
2. Is VERY efficient, can run for long periods of time
3. Creating the fuel for the car adds no detrimental emmissions
4. Creating the car creates no more detrimental emmissions than creating a bike
Would you still be an advocate of car-free? Why?
1. Has no detrimental emmissions
2. Is VERY efficient, can run for long periods of time
3. Creating the fuel for the car adds no detrimental emmissions
4. Creating the car creates no more detrimental emmissions than creating a bike
Would you still be an advocate of car-free? Why?
emissions alone are only a very very small part of the problem
our cities are dysfunctional due to the automobile
#15
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 3,481
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Thanks for all the response guys! Very interesting.
While I like, and agree with a lot of what you guys say, I would add one thing about car-free, it's not for everyone (physically). For example, a parapalegic cannot ride a bike, but can drive a car. Shipping things, including organic vegetables, into cold environments (such as Boston during winter) would not happen if everyone were car-free. And a lot of old people, even if they'd ridden a bike to work every day, would still eventually reach a place where a bike is no longer an option. (Not to mention the kids who live in a poor neighborhood, but to get a good schooling go to a school that's an hour's drive away. If you made them bike to school, they'd have no time to do homework, let alone anything else) Just some thoughts...
While I like, and agree with a lot of what you guys say, I would add one thing about car-free, it's not for everyone (physically). For example, a parapalegic cannot ride a bike, but can drive a car. Shipping things, including organic vegetables, into cold environments (such as Boston during winter) would not happen if everyone were car-free. And a lot of old people, even if they'd ridden a bike to work every day, would still eventually reach a place where a bike is no longer an option. (Not to mention the kids who live in a poor neighborhood, but to get a good schooling go to a school that's an hour's drive away. If you made them bike to school, they'd have no time to do homework, let alone anything else) Just some thoughts...
#16
put our Heads Together
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: southeast pennsylvania
Posts: 3,155
Bikes: a mountain bike with a cargo box on the back and aero bars on the front. an old well-worn dahon folding bike
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Would you still be an advocate of car-free? Why?
Of course, maybe I'm really a car-lite advocate. I don't know.
#17
Dubito ergo sum.
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Ottawa, ON, Canada
Posts: 1,735
Bikes: Bessie.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by donrhummy
Thanks for all the response guys! Very interesting.
For example, a parapalegic cannot ride a bike, but can drive a car.
Shipping things, including organic vegetables, into cold environments (such as Boston during winter) would not happen if everyone were car-free.
And a lot of old people, even if they'd ridden a bike to work every day, would still eventually reach a place where a bike is no longer an option.
Not to mention the kids who live in a poor neighborhood, but to get a good schooling go to a school that's an hour's drive away. If you made them bike to school, they'd have no time to do homework, let alone anything else)
All of the points you gave - good ones too - should NOT be a problem for most people in urban centres, and if they are it is because of a failure of local governments to provide basic urban services.
EDIT: I just checked, and its 50% of our buses which are wheelchair accessible, with 50 bus routes reliably using accessible buses on most runs.
Last edited by patc; 02-03-06 at 10:52 AM.
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Spur TX
Posts: 1,991
Bikes: Schwinn folder; SixThreeZero EvryJourney
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by patc
EDIT: I just checked, and its 50% of our buses which are wheelchair accessible, with 50 bus routes reliably using accessible buses on most runs.
#20
"Light is right"
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Henderson/Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 168
Bikes: 06 Cannondale Synapse, 93 Bridgestone XO-1 (commuter), 90 Specialized Sirrus
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Donrhummy
Interesting topic but "a parapalegic cannot ride a bike"Huh?.. PatC.."You have a valid point" What? There are paraplegic hand cyclist that commute to work everyday!
Interesting topic but "a parapalegic cannot ride a bike"Huh?.. PatC.."You have a valid point" What? There are paraplegic hand cyclist that commute to work everyday!
Last edited by Plosive; 02-03-06 at 11:45 AM.
#21
Dubito ergo sum.
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Ottawa, ON, Canada
Posts: 1,735
Bikes: Bessie.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Platy
There's not a lot for Texans to brag about here in the carfree forum, but in Austin 100% of the metro buses are handicapped accessible. Is there some reason not to have that everywhere?
Ottawa is playing catch-up here. Long ago, it was decided that all OC Transpo (our transit company) facilities would be fully accessible, so every bus station has ramps, elevators, etc. Unfortunately budget cuts and other issues never carried that forward to the actual buses. By the late 1990's our fleet was so old we sometimes had to borrow buses from other cities, and if a bus broke down during peak hour there was usually no replacement available. After city council finally woke up to the problem, they decided to replace the whole fleet (to be fair, the forced amalgamation of 5 large cities and a dozen small townships messed up priorities for a while!).
The short-term plan was to buy both "normal" and accessible buses, but to plan a shorter service life for the non-accessible one. The long-term goal is to have all vehicles fully accessible. I'm not sure what the time-line is for that.
Excuses aside, I agree with you that all public transit should be fully accessible, and any retro-fitting should be done ASAP.
#22
Pedaled too far.
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: La Petite Roche
Posts: 12,851
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 11 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times
in
7 Posts
Your argument is a straw man. We might as well also consider a flying carpet as opposed to a bike.
Such a car cannot be built. You must consider heat to be an emission. Any engine is going to be less efficient than a bicycle.
But why not a perfect car? A perfect car would still be bigger than a bicyle, causing more congestion on the roads and demanding more resources to make the roads.
I also pedal because it combines the need for exercise, transportation, and allows me to experience nature first hand while I pedal. The older I get the more important exercise becomes and the less I care about the environmental benefits of cycling.
Such a car cannot be built. You must consider heat to be an emission. Any engine is going to be less efficient than a bicycle.
But why not a perfect car? A perfect car would still be bigger than a bicyle, causing more congestion on the roads and demanding more resources to make the roads.
I also pedal because it combines the need for exercise, transportation, and allows me to experience nature first hand while I pedal. The older I get the more important exercise becomes and the less I care about the environmental benefits of cycling.
#23
est'd 1966
Join Date: May 2005
Location: portland, oregon
Posts: 273
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by donrhummy
Just a hypothetical...imagine that there's a car which can run on fuel which:
1. Has no detrimental emmissions
2. Is VERY efficient, can run for long periods of time
3. Creating the fuel for the car adds no detrimental emmissions
4. Creating the car creates no more detrimental emmissions than creating a bike
Would you still be an advocate of car-free? Why?
1. Has no detrimental emmissions
2. Is VERY efficient, can run for long periods of time
3. Creating the fuel for the car adds no detrimental emmissions
4. Creating the car creates no more detrimental emmissions than creating a bike
Would you still be an advocate of car-free? Why?
I blogged some reasons a while back: https://todd.cleverchimp.com/blog/?p=15. That entry has this bit from Ivan Illich in it, which speaks directly to your hypothesis:
"Cars create distance. Speedy vehicles of all kinds render space scarce. They drive wedges of highways into populated areas, and then extort tolls on the bridge over the remoteness between people that was manufactured for their sake. This monopoly over land turns space into car fodder. It destroys the environment for feet and bicycles. Even if planes and buses could run as nonpolluting, nondepleting public services, their inhuman velocities would degrade man’s innate mobility and force him to spend more time for the sake of travel."
Last edited by tfahrner; 02-03-06 at 03:51 PM.
#24
est'd 1966
Join Date: May 2005
Location: portland, oregon
Posts: 273
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by donrhummy
While I like, and agree with a lot of what you guys say, I would add one thing about car-free, it's not for everyone (physically). For example, a parapalegic cannot ride a bike, but can drive a car. Shipping things, including organic vegetables, into cold environments (such as Boston during winter) would not happen if everyone were car-free. And a lot of old people, even if they'd ridden a bike to work every day, would still eventually reach a place where a bike is no longer an option. (Not to mention the kids who live in a poor neighborhood, but to get a good schooling go to a school that's an hour's drive away. If you made them bike to school, they'd have no time to do homework, let alone anything else) Just some thoughts...
I don't believe that advocacy will drive the transition (hydrocarbon extraction and processing costs will), but advocacy can point the way toward better arrangements and celebrate their progress. I believe that I am raising my children to do better in an increasingly oil-scarce world by exemplifying a low-energy lifestyle that's fun, healthy, and rich.
#25
Every lane is a bike lane
Originally Posted by Artkansas
But why not a perfect car?
Continuing on that line -- one thing I note on my ride to work everyday, passing all those gridlocked cars, is that all of them are sitting their with their engines running. Am I the only one who considers this a huge waste? Why don't car engines stop when the car itself stops? It seems to me that if you're going to sit in gridlock for an hour, having the engine running the whole time just wastes more fuel, which in turn costs the driver money and pollutes the air for the rest of us. Considering all the newspaper space devoted to supposedly "innovative" car designs, one wonders why simple things like this are so often overlooked.
__________________
I am clinically insane. I am proud of it.
That is all.
I am clinically insane. I am proud of it.
That is all.