Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Bicycle Mechanics
Reload this Page >

135mm rear wheel build advice

Search
Notices
Bicycle Mechanics Broken bottom bracket? Tacoed wheel? If you're having problems with your bicycle, or just need help fixing a flat, drop in here for the latest on bicycle mechanics & bicycle maintenance.

135mm rear wheel build advice

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-04-24, 11:12 AM
  #26  
Senior Member
 
Kontact's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 7,278
Mentioned: 43 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4544 Post(s)
Liked 1,681 Times in 1,101 Posts
Why put such nice components on an old hybrid frame? You can buy a nice older road frame for less than $100. Isn't the BB on that 135mm hybrid 73mm rather than road 68mm? Why not use a classic Deore 8 speed hub?

The aesthetics and economics of this project make no sense to me.
Kontact is offline  
Old 05-04-24, 12:27 PM
  #27  
Cantilever believer
 
RCMoeur's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2021
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 1,623
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 554 Post(s)
Liked 1,922 Times in 863 Posts
Originally Posted by tomhaegler
there is not much axle left. I know you don‘t need much but I don‘t have a good feeling about this. And wouldn‘t it mess with the chainline?
Most of the shear force between the axle and dropout is handled by the locknuts and quick release face, not the axle itself. As I recall, John Allen did tests where there was no protruding axle past the locknuts on a respaced rear wheel and a properly-clamped QR didn't budge a bit under heavy load. Note that this was without a disc brake, just rim brakes.

The chainline and wheel dishing will dictate the side on which the spacers are added. In my experience, spacers are almost always added on the non-drive side, but yours may vary.
__________________
Richard C. Moeur, PE - Phoenix AZ, USA
https://www.richardcmoeur.com/bikestuf.html
RCMoeur is offline  
Likes For RCMoeur:
Old 05-04-24, 12:54 PM
  #28  
cowboy, steel horse, etc
 
LesterOfPuppets's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: The hot spot.
Posts: 45,025

Bikes: everywhere

Mentioned: 74 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12873 Post(s)
Liked 7,797 Times in 4,136 Posts
Originally Posted by Kontact
Why put such nice components on an old hybrid frame? You can buy a nice older road frame for less than $100. Isn't the BB on that 135mm hybrid 73mm rather than road 68mm?
I don't recall 73mm BBs being commonplace on MTBs in 1992.
LesterOfPuppets is online now  
Old 05-04-24, 01:04 PM
  #29  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 3,715

Bikes: Too many bikes, too little time to ride

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 443 Post(s)
Liked 474 Times in 328 Posts
If it were me, I'd try to source some MTB hubs or just live with 130mm hub that's squeezed in.
tFUnK is offline  
Likes For tFUnK:
Old 05-04-24, 02:15 PM
  #30  
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Basel, Switzerland
Posts: 50

Bikes: 1992 Koga Miyata Exerciser, 1996 Koga Miyata Adventure, 2019 Cannondale CAAD12, 2019 Cannondale Topstone

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 21 Post(s)
Liked 21 Times in 16 Posts
Originally Posted by Kontact
Why put such nice components on an old hybrid frame? You can buy a nice older road frame for less than $100. Isn't the BB on that 135mm hybrid 73mm rather than road 68mm? Why not use a classic Deore 8 speed hub?

The aesthetics and economics of this project make no sense to me.
I have nice old road frames. But most of them only take 25mm tires. If you want to run 32 or even wider gravel tires (like I do) you‘re better off with a hybrid frame. That‘s why. Makes sense to me, since I had old components left and did not want to spend 1000$+ on a modern steel gravel frame when I had this nice old frame with enough tire clearance and perfect geometry for me.
tomhaegler is offline  
Old 05-04-24, 02:18 PM
  #31  
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Basel, Switzerland
Posts: 50

Bikes: 1992 Koga Miyata Exerciser, 1996 Koga Miyata Adventure, 2019 Cannondale CAAD12, 2019 Cannondale Topstone

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 21 Post(s)
Liked 21 Times in 16 Posts
Originally Posted by tFUnK
If it were me, I'd try to source some MTB hubs or just live with 130mm hub that's squeezed in.
actually…you’re right. I‘m more and more thinking about just living with it. Or trying to cold set the dropouts 1-2mm further in on each side and call it done.
tomhaegler is offline  
Old 05-04-24, 04:13 PM
  #32  
Senior Member
 
Yan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,959
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2023 Post(s)
Liked 673 Times in 460 Posts
Why no just use that cheap Novatec hub I linked to. The whole wheel would only cost 100 Euro. I did a search online for forum comments and that hub seems to be fine.
Yan is offline  
Likes For Yan:
Old 05-04-24, 05:12 PM
  #33  
Senior Member
 
Kontact's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 7,278
Mentioned: 43 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4544 Post(s)
Liked 1,681 Times in 1,101 Posts
Originally Posted by LesterOfPuppets
I don't recall 73mm BBs being commonplace on MTBs in 1992.
They weren't. But neither was 135mm rear spacing, and those two go together. It was a change to add 2.5mm to the chainline by widening BB and hub by 5mm (73/135). If the BB is 68, the dropouts should be 130. So the OP might consider whether this should be 135 or someone spread it.

Originally Posted by tomhaegler
I have nice old road frames. But most of them only take 25mm tires. If you want to run 32 or even wider gravel tires (like I do) you‘re better off with a hybrid frame. That‘s why. Makes sense to me, since I had old components left and did not want to spend 1000$+ on a modern steel gravel frame when I had this nice old frame with enough tire clearance and perfect geometry for me.
That's cool, but why pair it with such pricey hubs if they don't even have the right specs? It isn't like superlight wheels are going to make up for the relatively heavy frame and fork.


I would suggest either going with less swanky wheelset, or coldsetting the frame to 130 so these super nice wheels are useful in other bikes. Going down to 130 is no more difficult than spreading from 126 to 130.
Kontact is offline  
Likes For Kontact:
Old 05-04-24, 07:07 PM
  #34  
cowboy, steel horse, etc
 
LesterOfPuppets's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: The hot spot.
Posts: 45,025

Bikes: everywhere

Mentioned: 74 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12873 Post(s)
Liked 7,797 Times in 4,136 Posts
Originally Posted by Kontact
They weren't. But neither was 135mm rear spacing, and those two go together. It was a change to add 2.5mm to the chainline by widening BB and hub by 5mm (73/135). If the BB is 68, the dropouts should be 130. So the OP might consider whether this should be 135 or someone spread it.
Wild. I kinda figured most MTB cassette rear wheels were 135. Pretty sure my 1991 MB-3 and 1992 Bianchi Grizzly have 135 rear ends and 68mm BBs. I'm gonna have to measure next time I get a chance.

ETA: Some companies stuck with 68mm BBs for a long time. I recall my 1996 Mongoose IBOC-SX had 135 rear and 68mm BB. Of course this was still in the square taper BB era and BB shell width didn't have much to do with chain line, that was controlled by BB spindle width. A 73mm BB shell does give builders a hair more room to provide a couple more mm tire clearance without bending chainstays as much and allows them to brag about a stiffer BB cluster as well

​​​​​

Last edited by LesterOfPuppets; 05-04-24 at 07:37 PM.
LesterOfPuppets is online now  
Old 05-04-24, 07:51 PM
  #35  
Senior Member
 
Kontact's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 7,278
Mentioned: 43 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4544 Post(s)
Liked 1,681 Times in 1,101 Posts
Originally Posted by LesterOfPuppets
Wild. I kinda figured most MTB cassette rear wheels were 135. Pretty sure my 1991 MB-3 and 1992 Bianchi Grizzly have 135 rear ends and 68mm BBs. I'm gonna have to measure next time I get a chance.

ETA: Some companies stuck with 68mm BBs for a long time. I recall my 1996 Mongoose IBOC-SX had 135 rear and 68mm BB. Of course this was still in the square taper BB era and BB shell width didn't have much to do with chain line, that was controlled by BB spindle width. A 73mm BB shell does give builders a hair more room to provide a couple more mm tire clearance without bending chainstays as much and allows them to brag about a stiffer BB cluster as well

​​​​​
My '96 Litespeed MTB is 130/68. What people forget is that 130 was road bike 8 speed, but it was first MTB 7 speed. And going to 73/135 was an effort to decrease chain suck creating more room for the chain stays and rings, not to make more room in the rear. There were a ton of minor changes made that allowed suck guards and elevated chainstays (Nishiki Alien) to go away.
Kontact is offline  
Old 05-04-24, 09:01 PM
  #36  
Really Old Senior Member
 
Bill Kapaun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Mid Willamette Valley, Orygun
Posts: 13,922

Bikes: 87 RockHopper,2008 Specialized Globe. Both upgraded to 9 speeds. 2019 Giant Explore E+3

Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1813 Post(s)
Liked 1,297 Times in 893 Posts
Originally Posted by LesterOfPuppets
.......I recall my 1996 Mongoose IBOC-SX had 135 rear and 68mm BB.
​​​​​
As does my 2008 Globe.
Bill Kapaun is offline  
Old 05-04-24, 11:13 PM
  #37  
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Basel, Switzerland
Posts: 50

Bikes: 1992 Koga Miyata Exerciser, 1996 Koga Miyata Adventure, 2019 Cannondale CAAD12, 2019 Cannondale Topstone

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 21 Post(s)
Liked 21 Times in 16 Posts
Originally Posted by Kontact
They weren't. But neither was 135mm rear spacing, and those two go together. It was a change to add 2.5mm to the chainline by widening BB and hub by 5mm (73/135). If the BB is 68, the dropouts should be 130. So the OP might consider whether this should be 135 or someone spread it.


That's cool, but why pair it with such pricey hubs if they don't even have the right specs? It isn't like superlight wheels are going to make up for the relatively heavy frame and fork.


I would suggest either going with less swanky wheelset, or coldsetting the frame to 130 so these super nice wheels are useful in other bikes. Going down to 130 is no more difficult than spreading from 126 to 130.
actually, this was going through my head as well. Building an expensive wheel which can only be used in one frame I have makes no sense at all.
I will either go cheap or cold setting.
tomhaegler is offline  
Old 05-04-24, 11:20 PM
  #38  
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Basel, Switzerland
Posts: 50

Bikes: 1992 Koga Miyata Exerciser, 1996 Koga Miyata Adventure, 2019 Cannondale CAAD12, 2019 Cannondale Topstone

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 21 Post(s)
Liked 21 Times in 16 Posts
Originally Posted by Yan
Why no just use that cheap Novatec hub I linked to. The whole wheel would only cost 100 Euro. I did a search online for forum comments and that hub seems to be fine.
you‘re right. Unfortunately they are 32h - bit much for my taste. I was also looking at this 45$ hub (China DT Clone), some people built with it…but hard to find opinions:
https://a.aliexpress.com/_EyJC0q3 - obviously you can use DT Swiss replacement parts as well. Not an Aliexpress guy, though…
tomhaegler is offline  
Old 05-05-24, 12:06 AM
  #39  
Senior Member
 
Yan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,959
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2023 Post(s)
Liked 673 Times in 460 Posts
Originally Posted by tomhaegler
you‘re right. Unfortunately they are 32h - bit much for my taste. I was also looking at this 45$ hub (China DT Clone), some people built with it…but hard to find opinions:
https://a.aliexpress.com/_EyJC0q3 - obviously you can use DT Swiss replacement parts as well. Not an Aliexpress guy, though…
Try searching on the Chinertown forum. They are the AliExpress experts.
Yan is offline  
Likes For Yan:
Old 05-05-24, 07:46 AM
  #40  
Senior Member
 
grumpus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 1,350
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 539 Post(s)
Liked 477 Times in 364 Posts
Originally Posted by tomhaegler
Now: For a build (old steel frame turned to fast road bike, see here), I need a 135mm rear wheel (QR / rim brake, 11s road HG, light) which is not that easy to find.

I‘m currently using a Mavic Aksium wheelset (130mm) and just squeeze the dropouts together. But as I really like that bike and ride it a lot (more than my modern road bike currently), I am looking for a more permanent solution that make taking out/putting in the wheel easier and give me more peace of mind while riding fast - on a non squeezed frame.
135 mm is MTB spacing - if it's now a road bike just bend it slightly so it's 130 mm wide, it's steel so it's fine to do that.
grumpus is offline  
Likes For grumpus:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.